J Korean Surg Soc.  2011 Nov;81(5):321-325. 10.4174/jkss.2011.81.5.321.

Comparison of clinical outcomes and hospital cost between open appendectomy and laparoscopic appendectomy

• Lee HJ
• Park YH
• Kim JI
• Choi PW
• Park JH
• Heo TG
• Lee MS
• Kim CN
• Chang SH

• KMID: 2096685
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4174/jkss.2011.81.5.321

Abstract

PURPOSE
Laparoscopic appendectomy has been recognized to have many advantages such as greater cosmetic results, less postoperative pain and shorter hospital stays. On the other hand, the cost of laparoscopic procedures is still more expensive than that of open procedures in Korea. The aim of this study is to compare clinical outcomes and hospital costs between open appendectomy and laparoscopic appendectomy.
METHODS
Between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2010, 471 patients were diagnosed with acute appendicitis. Of these, 418 patients met the inclusion criteria and were divided into two groups of open appendectomy (OA) group and laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) group. We analyzed the clinical data and hospital costs.
RESULTS
The mean operation time for laparoscopic appendectomy (72.17 minutes) was significantly longer than that of open appendectomy (46.26 minutes) (P = 0.0004). The mean amounts of intravenous analgesics for OA group (2.00 times) was greater than that of LA group (1.86 times) (P < 0.0001). The complication rate was similar between the two groups (OA, 6.99% vs. LA, 10.87%; P = 0.3662). The mean length of postoperative hospital stay was shorter in LA group (OA, 4.55 days vs. LA, 3.60 days; P = 0.0002). The mean total cost covered by the National Health Insurance was more expensive in LA group (OA, 1,259,842 won [Korean monetary unit] vs. LA, 1,664,367 won; P = 0.0057).
CONCLUSION
Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic appendectomy were superior to that of open appendectomy even though the cost of laparoscopic appendectomy was more expensive than that of open appendectomy. Whenever surgeons manage a patient with appendicitis, laparoscopic appendectomy should be considered as the procedure of choice.

Keyword

Appendicitis; Appendectomy; Hospital costs; Clinical outcomes

MeSH Terms

Analgesics
Appendectomy
Appendicitis
Cosmetics
Hand
Hospital Costs
Humans
Korea
Length of Stay
National Health Programs
Pain, Postoperative
Analgesics
Cosmetics

Reference

1. Park JH, Hyun KH, Park CH, Choi SY, Choi WH, Kim DJ, et al. Laparoscopic vs transumbilical single-port laparoscopic appendectomy: results of prospective randomized trial. J Korean Surg Soc. 2010. 78:213–218.

2. Semm K. Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy. 1983. 15:59–64.

3. Kim HJ, Lee JI, Lee SC, Kim SH, Lee IK, Lee YS, et al. Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy. J Korean Surg Soc. 2010. 78:338–342.

4. Hong YH, Sohn TJ, Oh SJ, Chang YS, Kang JH, Kim DH, et al. Comparison of single port and conventional laparoscopic surgery in acute appendicitis. J Korean Soc Endosc Laparosc Surg. 2010. 13:102–106.

5. Park JY, Choe YM, Yun MY, Choi SK, Hur YS, Lee KY, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for perforated appendicitis in children. J Korean Surg Soc. 2008. 75:116–119.

6. Park JM, Kim J, Kim CY, Choi DJ, Kim SH, Kim CS, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy: a safe procedure that can be performed by surgical residents. J Korean Surg Soc. 2008. 75:315–322.

7. Jun YW, Jung H, Kim SJ, Jun KH, Chin HM, Park WB. Comparison of clinical outcomes between laparoscopic and open appendectomy: a retrospective analysis of 2,745 patients. J Korean Surg Soc. 2009. 77:320–325.

8. Seo K, Choi Y, Choi J, Yoon K. Laparoscopic appendectomy is feasible for inexperienced surgeons in the early days of individual laparoscopic training courses. J Korean Surg Soc. 2009. 76:23–27.

9. Park SS, Kim HS, Ryu BY, Kim HK, Lee JH, Lee JW, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. J Korean Soc Endosc Laparosc Surg. 2010. 13:69–73.

10. Yang YJ, Kim ID, Kim KH, Park JS, Suh BS, Kim SW, et al. Comparsion of laparoscopic appendectomy vs open appendectomy in non-complicated appendicitis and complicated appendicitis. J Korean Soc Endosc Laparosc Surg. 2010. 13:74–79.

11. John MA, Kimberly SK. Townsend CM, Beauchamp RD, Evers BM, Mattox KL, editors. The appendix. Textbook of surgery: the biological basis of modern surgical practice. 2008. 18th ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders;917–973.

12. Clarke T, Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, Cheng BC, Olasky J, Sohn HJ, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for the obese patient: a subset analysis from a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Surg Endosc. 2011. 25:1276–1280.

13. Wei B, Qi CL, Chen TF, Zheng ZH, Huang JL, Hu BG, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a metaanalysis. Surg Endosc. 2011. 25:1199–1208.

14. Liu Z, Zhang P, Ma Y, Chen H, Zhou Y, Zhang M, et al. Laparoscopy or not: a meta-analysis of the surgical effects of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2010. 20:362–370.

15. Ingraham AM, Cohen ME, Bilimoria KY, Pritts TA, Ko CY, Esposito TJ. Comparison of outcomes after laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis at 222 ACS NSQIP hospitals. Surgery. 2010. 148:625–635.