Clin Endosc.  2012 Mar;45(1):89-94. 10.5946/ce.2012.45.1.89.

Endoscopic Resection for Rectal Carcinoid Tumors: Comparision of Polypectomy and Endoscopic Submucosal Resection with Band Ligation

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
  • 2Department of Internal Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea. parksj@ns.kosinmed.or.kr
  • 3Department of Pathology, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS
Rectal carcinoid tumors, at diagnosis, are as small as 10 mm or less in about 80% of patients. These tumors are generally removed by endoscopic resection. The aim of this study was to compare treatment efficacy and safety between endoscopic submucosal resection with band ligation (ESMR-L) and conventional polypectomy.
METHODS
Between January 2005 and September 2010, a total of 88 patients, who visited at Busan Paik Hospital and Kosin University Gospel Hospital for endoscopic resection of rectal carcinoid, were reviewed, retrospectively.
RESULTS
Thirty-three cases were treated by ESMR-L, and 55 cases by conventional polypectomy. There were no significant difference in the size of tumor between ESMR-L group and polypectomy group (6.02+/-2.36 vs. 6.49+/-3.24 mm, p=0.474). The rate of positive resection margin was significantly lower in ESMR-L group (2/33, 6.1%) than in polypectomy group (19/55, 34.5%; p=0.002). The rate of positive vertical resection margin, among others, was markedly lower in ESMR-L group (1/33, 3.0%) compared to polypectomy group (19/55, 34.5%; p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
ESMR-L, rather than conventional polypectomy, is a useful treatment option for removal of rectal carcinoid tumors less than 10 mm in diameter.

Keyword

Rectal carcinoid tumor; Polypectomy; Band ligation

MeSH Terms

Carcinoid Tumor
Humans
Ligation
Treatment Outcome

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Conventional polypectomy. (A) There is a 6 mm-sized yellow colored submucosal tumor at rectum. (B) Submucosal injection is done. (C) Snaring of the elevated submucosal lesion is done. (D) It shows a post-polypectomy ulcer.

  • Fig. 2 Endoscopic submucosal resection with band ligation. (A) There is a 6 mm-sized yellow colored submucosal mass at rectum. (B) Tumor is aspirated by band ligation cap. (C) Tumor is ligated by band. (D) Snaring of the ligated tumor below band is done.


Cited by  1 articles

Rectal Carcinoid Tumors: Pitfalls of Conventional Polypectomy
Soung Min Jeon, Jae Hee Cheon
Clin Endosc. 2012;45(1):2-3.    doi: 10.5946/ce.2012.45.1.2.


Reference

1. Oberndorfer S. Karzinoide Tumoren des Dünndarms. Frankf Z Pathol. 1907; 1:426–429.
2. Gosset A, Masson P. Tumeurs endocrines de l'appendice. Presse Med. 1914; 22:237–240.
3. Marshall JB, Bodnarchuk G. Carcinoid tumors of the gut. Our experience over three decades and review of the literature. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1993; 16:123–129. PMID: 8463615.
4. Modlin IM, Sandor A. An analysis of 8305 cases of carcinoid tumors. Cancer. 1997; 79:813–829. PMID: 9024720.
Article
5. Kulke MH, Mayer RJ. Carcinoid tumors. N Engl J Med. 1999; 340:858–868. PMID: 10080850.
Article
6. Modlin IM, Oberg K, Chung DC, et al. Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Lancet Oncol. 2008; 9:61–72. PMID: 18177818.
Article
7. Modlin IM, Lye KD, Kidd M. A 5-decade analysis of 13,715 carcinoid tumors. Cancer. 2003; 97:934–959. PMID: 12569593.
Article
8. Matsui K, Iwase T, Kitagawa M. Small, polypoid-appearing carcinoid tumors of the rectum: clinicopathologic study of 16 cases and effectiveness of endoscopic treatment. Am J Gastroenterol. 1993; 88:1949–1953. PMID: 8237948.
9. Okamoto Y, Fujii M, Tateiwa S, et al. Treatment of multiple rectal carcinoids by endoscopic mucosal resection using a device for esophageal variceal ligation. Endoscopy. 2004; 36:469–470. PMID: 15100972.
Article
10. Matsumoto T, Iida M, Suekane H, Tominaga M, Yao T, Fujishima M. Endoscopic ultrasonography in rectal carcinoid tumors: contribution to selection of therapy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991; 37:539–542. PMID: 1936832.
Article
11. Ono A, Fujii T, Saito Y, et al. Endoscopic submucosal resection of rectal carcinoid tumors with a ligation device. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003; 57:583–587. PMID: 12665777.
Article
12. Mashimo Y, Matsuda T, Uraoka T, et al. Endoscopic submucosal resection with a ligation device is an effective and safe treatment for carcinoid tumors in the lower rectum. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008; 23:218–221. PMID: 18289355.
Article
13. Godwin JD 2nd. Carcinoid tumors. An analysis of 2,837 cases. Cancer. 1975; 36:560–569. PMID: 1157019.
14. Teleky B, Herbst F, Langle F, Neuhold N, Niederle B. The prognosis of rectal carcinoid tumours. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1992; 7:11–14. PMID: 1588217.
Article
15. Jung KC, Kim HS, Song SY, Choe GY, Kim YI. Carcinoid tumors of the gastrointestinal tract: analysis of 36 cases. Korean J Pathol. 1996; 30:396–407.
16. Jang NS, Sung KC, Pyeon YJ, et al. Clinical reviews of patients with carcinoid tumor. Korean J Gastroenterol. 1997; 30:179–186.
17. Chung MG, Kang DH, Kim ES, et al. Clinical study of gastrointestinal carcinoid tumors. Korean J Gastrointest Endosc. 2002; 24:135–142.
18. Chang JH, Kim SW, Chung WC, et al. Clinical review of gastrointestinal carcinoid tumor and analysis of the factors predicting metastasis. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2007; 50:19–25. PMID: 18172355.
19. Lee MH, Shin SJ, Jeon SJ, et al. Clinical characteristics of gastrointestinal carcinoid tumors. Korean J Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 40:347–351.
20. Jetmore AB, Ray JE, Gathright JB Jr, McMullen KM, Hicks TC, Timmcke AE. Rectal carcinoids: the most frequent carcinoid tumor. Dis Colon Rectum. 1992; 35:717–725. PMID: 1643994.
21. Soga J. Early-stage carcinoids of the gastrointestinal tract: an analysis of 1914 reported cases. Cancer. 2005; 103:1587–1595. PMID: 15742328.
22. Konishi T, Watanabe T, Kishimoto J, Kotake K, Muto T, Nagawa H. Prognosis and risk factors of metastasis in colorectal carcinoids: results of a nationwide registry over 15 years. Gut. 2007; 56:863–868. PMID: 17213340.
Article
23. Sauven P, Ridge JA, Quan SH, Sigurdson ER. Anorectal carcinoid tumors. Is aggressive surgery warranted? Ann Surg. 1990; 211:67–71. PMID: 2294847.
24. Tsukamoto S, Fujita S, Yamaguchi T, et al. Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of rectal well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008; 23:1109–1113. PMID: 18594844.
Article
25. Kwaan MR, Goldberg JE, Bleday R. Rectal carcinoid tumors: review of results after endoscopic and surgical therapy. Arch Surg. 2008; 143:471–475. PMID: 18490556.
26. Ramage JK, Goretzki PE, Manfredi R, et al. Consensus guidelines for the management of patients with digestive neuroendocrine tumours: well-differentiated colon and rectum tumour/carcinoma. Neuroendocrinology. 2008; 87:31–39. PMID: 18097130.
Article
27. Scherübl H. Options for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Lancet Oncol. 2008; 9:203. PMID: 18308249.
Article
28. Shinohara T, Hotta K, Oyama T. Rectal carcinoid tumor, 6 mm in diameter, with lymph node metastases. Endoscopy. 2008; 40(Suppl 2):E40–E41. PMID: 18302079.
29. Scherübl H. Rectal carcinoids are on the rise: early detection by screening endoscopy. Endoscopy. 2009; 41:162–165. PMID: 19214898.
Article
30. Kobayashi K, Katsumata T, Yoshizawa S, et al. Indications of endoscopic polypectomy for rectal carcinoid tumors and clinical usefulness of endoscopic ultrasonography. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005; 48:285–291. PMID: 15714250.
Article
31. Iishi H, Tatsuta M, Yano H, Narahara H, Iseki K, Ishiguro S. More effective endoscopic resection with a two-channel colonoscope for carcinoid tumors of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996; 39:1438–1439. PMID: 8969673.
Article
32. Higaki S, Nishiaki M, Mitani N, Yanai H, Tada M, Okita K. Effectiveness of local endoscopic resection of rectal carcinoid tumors. Endoscopy. 1997; 29:171–175. PMID: 9201465.
Article
33. Koyama N, Yoshida H, Nihei M, Sakonji M, Wachi E. Endoscopic resection of rectal carcinoids using double snare polypectomy technique. Dig Endosc. 1998; 10:42–45.
Article
34. Nagai T, Torishima R, Nakashima H, et al. Saline-assisted endoscopic resection of rectal carcinoids: cap aspiration method versus simple snare resection. Endoscopy. 2004; 36:202–205. PMID: 14986216.
Article
35. Kim YJ, Lee SK, Cheon JH, et al. Efficacy of endoscopic resection for small rectal carcinoid: a retrospective study. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2008; 51:174–180. PMID: 18451691.
36. Zhou PH, Yao LQ, Qin XY, et al. Advantages of endoscopic submucosal dissection with needle-knife over endoscopic mucosal resection for small rectal carcinoid tumors: a retrospective study. Surg Endosc. 2010; 24:2607–2612. PMID: 20361212.
Article
37. Park HW, Byeon JS, Park YS, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for treatment of rectal carcinoid tumors. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 72:143–149. PMID: 20381798.
Article
38. Berkelhammer C, Jasper I, Kirvaitis E, Schreiber S, Hamilton J, Walloch J. "Band-snare" resection of small rectal carcinoid tumors. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999; 50:582–585. PMID: 10502190.
Article
39. Moon JH, Kim JH, Park CH, et al. Endoscopic submucosal resection with double ligation technique for treatment of small rectal carcinoid tumors. Endoscopy. 2006; 38:511–514. PMID: 16767589.
Article
40. Ishikawa H, Imanishi K, Otani T, Okuda S, Tatsuta M, Ishiguro S. Effectiveness of endoscopic treatment of carcinoid tumors of the rectum. Endoscopy. 1989; 21:133–135. PMID: 2743944.
Article
41. Koura AN, Giacco GG, Curley SA, Skibber JM, Feig BW, Ellis LM. Carcinoid tumors of the rectum: effect of size, histopathology, and surgical treatment on metastasis free survival. Cancer. 1997; 79:1294–1298. PMID: 9083149.
Full Text Links
  • CE
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr