Restor Dent Endod.  2012 Mar;37(1):9-15. 10.5395/rde.2012.37.1.9.

Effect of different chlorhexidine application times on microtensile bond strength to dentin in Class I cavities

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Conservative Dentistry, Dankook University College of Dentistry and Institute of Dental Science, Cheonan, Korea. donyshin@dankook.ac.kr

Abstract


OBJECTIVES
This study evaluated the effect of 2% chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) with different application times on microtensile bonds strength (MTBS) to dentin in class I cavities and intended to search for ideal application time for a simplified bonding protocol.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Flat dentinal surfaces with class I cavities (4 mm x 4 mm x 2 mm) in 40 molar teeth were bonded with etch-and-rinse adhesive system, Adper Single Bond 2 (3M ESPE) after: (1) etching only as a control group; (2) etching + CHX 5 sec + rinsing; (3) etching + CHX 15 sec + rinsing; (4) etching + CHX 30 sec + rinsing; and (5) etching + CHX 60 sec + rinsing. Resin composite was built-up with Z-250 (3M ESPE) using a bulk method and polymerized for 40 sec. For each condition, half of the specimens were immediately submitted to MTBS test and the rest of them were assigned to thermocycling of 10,000 cycles between 5degrees C and 55degrees C before testing. The data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA, at a significance level of 95%.
RESULTS
There was no significant difference in bond strength between CHX pre-treated group and control group at the immediate testing period. After thermocycling, all groups showed reduced bond strength irrespective of the CHX use. However, groups treated with CHX maintained significantly higher MTBS than control group (p < 0.05). In addition, CHX application time did not have any significant influence on the bond strength among groups treated with CHX.
CONCLUSION
Application of 2% CHX for a short time period (5 sec) after etching with 37% phosphoric acid may be sufficient to preserve dentin bond strength.

Keyword

Application time; Chlorhexidine; Class I cavity; Etching; Microtensile bond strength; Thermocycling

MeSH Terms

Adhesives
Chlorhexidine
Dental Cements
Dentin
Molar
Phosphoric Acids
Polymers
Tooth
Adhesives
Chlorhexidine
Dental Cements
Phosphoric Acids
Polymers

Figure

  • Figure 1 Preparation of bonding substrate. (a) Extracted human tooth before preparation, (b) After enamel removal and cavity preparation (4 mm × 4 mm × 2 mm).

  • Figure 2 Specimen preparation for microtensile bond strength test. (a) Bonding substrate were restored with adhesive and composite, and excess composite was built up on the outer surface of the restoration; (b) Resin-dentin sticks with a rectangular cross-sectional area of approximately 1 mm × 1 mm; (c) Microtensile bond strength test at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min.


Cited by  1 articles

Comparative evaluation of Emblica officinalis as an etchant and an MMP inhibitor with orthophosphoric acid and chlorhexidine on the microshear bond strength of composite resin: an ex vivo study
Divya Sangeetha Rajkumar, Annapoorna Ballagere Mariswamy
Restor Dent Endod. 2021;46(3):e36.    doi: 10.5395/rde.2021.46.e36.


Reference

1. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Van Meerbeek B. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res. 2005. 84:118–132.
Article
2. Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Ruggeri A, Cadenaro M, Di Lenarda R, De Stefano Dorigo E. Dental adhesion review: aging and stability of the bonded interface. Dent Mater. 2008. 24:90–101.
Article
3. Wang Y, Spencer P. Hybridization efficiency of the adhesive/dentin interface with wet bonding. J Dent Res. 2003. 82:141–145.
Article
4. Wang Y, Spencer P. Continuing etching of an all-in-one adhesive in wet dentin tubules. J Dent Res. 2005. 84:350–354.
Article
5. Yiu CK, King NM, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Carvalho RM, Carrilho MR, Tay FR. Effect of resin hydrophilicity and water storage on resin strength. Biomaterials. 2004. 25:5789–5796.
Article
6. Carrilho MR, Tay FR, Pashley DH, Tjäderhane L, Carvalho RM. Mechanical stability of resin-dentin bond components. Dent Mater. 2005. 21:232–241.
Article
7. Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Sano H, Kaga M, Oguchi H. In vitro degradation of resin-dentin bonds analyzed by microtensile bond test, scanning and transmission electron microscopy. Biomaterials. 2003. 24:3795–3803.
Article
8. Pashley DH, Tay FR, Yiu C, Hashimoto M, Breschi L, Carvalho RM, Ito S. Collagen degradation by host-derived enzymes during aging. J Dent Res. 2004. 83:216–221.
Article
9. Soares CJ, Pereira CA, Pereira JC, Santana FR, do Prado CJ. Effect of chlorhexidine application on microtensile bond strength to dentin. Oper Dent. 2008. 33:183–188.
Article
10. Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res. 1982. 16:265–273.
Article
11. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent. 2003. 28:215–235.
12. Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B, Snauwaert J, Hellemans L, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Wakasa K, Pashley DH. A novel approach to AFM characterization of adhesive tooth-biomaterial interfaces. J Biomed Mater Res. 1999. 47:85–90.
Article
13. Spencer P, Wang Y. Adhesive phase separation at the dentin interface under wet bonding conditions. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002. 62:447–456.
Article
14. Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Kaga M, Sano H, Endo K, Oguchi H. The extent to which resin can infiltrate dentin by acetone-based adhesives. J Dent Res. 2002. 81:74–78.
Article
15. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Yoshiyama M. Two modes of nanoleakage expression in single-step adhesives. J Dent Res. 2002. 81:472–476.
Article
16. Tjäderhane L, Larjava H, Sorsa T, Uitto VJ, Larmas M, Salo T. The activation and function of host matrix metalloproteinases in dentin matrix breakdown in caries lesions. J Dent Res. 1998. 77:1622–1629.
Article
17. Sulkala M, Larma M, Sorsa T, Salo T, Tjäderhane L. The localization of matrix metalloproteinases-20 (MMP-20, enamelysin) in mature human teeth. J Dent Res. 2002. 81:603–607.
Article
18. Van Strijp AJ, Jansen DC, DeGroot J, Ten Cate JM, Everts V. Host-derived proteinases and degradation of dentine collagen in situ. Caries Res. 2003. 37:58–65.
Article
19. Lee W, Aitken S, Sodek J, McCulloch CA. Evidence of a direct relationship between neutrophil collagenase activity and periodontal tissue destruction in vivo: role of active enzyme in human periodontitis. J Periodont Res. 1995. 30:23–33.
Article
20. Hebling J, Pashley DH, Tjäderhane L, Tay FR. Chlorhexidine arrests subclinical degradation of dentin hybrid layers in vivo. J Dent Res. 2005. 84:741–746.
Article
21. Brackett WW, Tay FR, Brackett MG, Dib A, Sword RJ, Pashely DH. The effect of chlorhexidine on dentin hybrid layers in vivo. Oper dent. 2007. 32:107–111.
22. Carrilho MR, Carvalho RM, de Goes MF, di Hipólito V, Geraldeli S, Tay FR, Pashley DH, Tjäderhane L. Chlorhexidine preserves dentin bond in vitro. J Dent Res. 2007. 86:90–94.
23. Carrilho MR, Geraldeli S, Tay F, de Goes MF, Carvalho RM, Tjäderhane L, Reis AF, Hebling J, Mazzoni A, Breschi L, Pashley D. In vivo preservation of the hybrid layer by chlorhexidine. J Dent Res. 2007. 86:529–533.
Article
24. Stanley A, Wilson M, Newman HN. The in vitro effects of chlorhexidine on subgingival plaque bacteria. J Clin Periodontol. 1989. 16:259–264.
Article
25. Bok YB, Lee DY, Lee CY, Kim KN, Kum KY. The sustaining effect of three polymers on the release of chlorhexidine from a controlled release drug device for root canal disinfection. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2004. 29:548–554.
Article
26. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Have dentin adhesives become too hydrophilic? J Can Dent Assoc. 2003. 69:726–731.
27. Stanislawczuk R, Amaral RC, Zander-Grande C, Gagler D, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Chlorhexidine-containing acid conditioner preserves the longevity of resin-dentin bonds. Oper Dent. 2009. 34:481–490.
Article
28. Chang YE, Shin DH. Effect of chlorhexidine application methods on microtensile bond strength to dentin in Class I cavities. Oper Dent. 2010. 35:618–623.
Article
29. de Castro FL, de Andrade MF, Duarte Júnior SL, Vaz LG, Ahid FJ. Effect of 2% chlorhexidine on microtensile bond strength of composite to dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2003. 5:129–138.
30. Perdigao J, Denehy GE, Swift EJ Jr. Effects of chlorhexidine on dentin surfaces and shear bond strengths. Am J Dent. 1994. 7:81–84.
31. Fardal O, Turnbull RS. A review of the literature on use of chlorhexidine in dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc. 1986. 112:863–869.
Article
32. Kim Y, Park JW, Lee CY, Song YJ, Seo DK, Roh BD. The influence of cavity configuration on the microtensile bond strength between composite resin and dentin. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2008. 33:472–480.
Article
33. Loguercio AD, Stanislawczuk R, Polli LG, Costa JA, Michel MD, Reis A. Influence of chlorhexidine digluconate concentration and application time on resin-dentin bond strength durability. Eur J Oral Sci. 2009. 117:587–596.
Article
34. Tay FR, Gwinnett JA, Wei SH. Realtion between water content in acetone/alcohol-based primer and interfacial ultrastructure. J Dent. 1998. 26:147–156.
Article
Full Text Links
  • RDE
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr