Yonsei Med J.  2010 Nov;51(6):877-882. 10.3349/ymj.2010.51.6.877.

Impact of Prostate Volume on the Efficacy of High-Power Potassium-Titanyl-Phosphate Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate: A Retrospective, Short-Term Follow-Up Study on Evaluating Feasibility and Safety

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. jspaick@snu.ac.kr

Abstract

PURPOSE
We determined the impact of prostate volume on the efficacy of the high-power (80 W) potassium-titanyl-phosphate (KTP) photoselective laser vaporization of the prostate in men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patients were stratified into 3 groups according to prostate volume: '< 40 g' (n = 49) and '40-59 g' (n = 49) and '> or = 60 g' (n = 22). Median follow-up was 9 months (range 6 to 21).
RESULTS
No differences in age and follow-up duration were observed in the three groups. At baseline, no significant differences were noted in the three groups in terms of the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) (21.4, 19.4 and 19.1; p = 0.412) as well as the maximum flow rate (Qmax) (10.2, 9.2, and 8.6 mL/s; p = 0.291) and post-void residual (PVR) (66.2, 80.4, and 71.5 mL; p = 0.856). The mean operative times were 30.9, 46.9, and 58.6 minutes (p < 0.001) and total median energy deliveries for each group were 62.3, 97.6, and 135.9 kJ, respectively (p < 0.001). No severe intraoperative complication was observed. At the last follow-up, these parameters improved significantly regardless of prostate volume, and the IPSS (11.1, 9.4, and 12.3; p = 0.286) as well as Qmax (15.9, 15.9, and 14.2 mL/s; p = 0.690) and PVR (33.7, 28.4, and 14.2 mL; p = 0.395) were not significantly different among the groups.
CONCLUSION
Although a larger prostate requires more time and energy delivery, photoselective laser vaporization of the prostate is safe and efficacious for patients with LUTS regardless of prostate volume.

Keyword

Prostate; benign prostatic hyperplasia; vaporization; KTP; laser surgery

MeSH Terms

Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Feasibility Studies
Humans
Laser Therapy
Male
Middle Aged
Phosphates/*chemistry
Prostate/*physiology/surgery
Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood
Prostatic Hyperplasia/complications/*surgery
Retrospective Studies
Titanium/*chemistry
Treatment Outcome
Urinary Tract/pathology
Volatilization

Cited by  1 articles

Efficacy of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate in Patients with a Small Prostate (≤30 mL)
Sejun Park, Taekmin Kwon, Sungchan Park, Kyung Hyun Moon
World J Mens Health. 2017;35(3):163-169.    doi: 10.5534/wjmh.17011.


Reference

1. Hai MA, Malek RS. Photoselective vaporization of the prostate: initial experience with a new 80 W KTP laser for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Endourol. 2003. 17:93–96.
Article
2. Te AE, Malloy TR, Stein BS, Ulchaker JC, Nseyo UO, Hai MA, et al. Photoselective vaporization of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: 12-month results from the first United States multicenter prospective trial. J Urol. 2004. 72:1404–1408.
Article
3. Sandhu JS, Ng C, Vanderbrink BA, Egan C, Kaplan SA, Te AE. High-power potassium-titanyl-phosphate photoselective laser vaporization of prostate for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia in men with large prostates. Urology. 2004. 64:1155–1159.
Article
4. Sulser T, Reich O, Wyler S, Ruszat R, Casella R, Hofstetter A, et al. Photoselective KTP laser vaporization of the prostate: first experiences with 65 procedures. J Endourol. 2004. 18:976–981.
Article
5. Sandhu JS, Ng CK, Gonzalez RR, Kaplan SA, Te AE. Photoselective laser vaporization prostatectomy in men receiving anticoagulants. J Endourol. 2005. 19:1196–1198.
Article
6. Reich O, Bachmann A, Siebels M, Hofstetter A, Stief CG, Sulser T. High power (80 W) potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser vaporization of the prostate in 66 high risk patients. J Urol. 2005. 173:158–160.
Article
7. Kumar SM. Photoselective vaporization of the prostate: a volume reduction analysis in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia and carcinoma of the prostate. J Urol. 2005. 173:511–513.
Article
8. Malek RS, Kuntzman RS, Barrett DM. Photoselective potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser vaporization of the benign obstructive prostate: observations on long-term outcomes. J Urol. 2005. 174:1344–1348.
Article
9. Bachmann A, Ruszat R, Wyler S, Reich O, Seifert HH, Müller A, et al. Photoselective vaporization of the prostate: the basel experience after 108 procedures. Eur Urol. 2005. 47:798–804.
Article
10. Volkan T, Ihsan TA, Yilmaz O, Emin O, Selcuk S, Koray K, et al. Short term outcomes of high power (80 W) potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser vaporization of the prostate. Eur Urol. 2005. 48:608–613.
Article
11. Sarica K, Alkan E, Lüleci H, Tasci AI. Photoselective vaporization of the enlarged prostate with KTP laser: long-term results in 240 patients. J Endourol. 2005. 19:1199–1202.
Article
12. Barber NJ, Zhu G, Donohue JF, Thompson PM, Walsh K, Muir GH. Use of expired breath ethanol measurements in evaluation of irrigant absorption during high-power potassium titanyl phosphate laser vaporization of prostate. Urology. 2006. 67:80–83.
Article
13. Monoski MA, Gonzalez RR, Sandhu JS, Reddy B, Te AE. Urodynamic predictors of outcomes with photoselective laser vaporization prostatectomy in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia and preoperative retention. Urology. 2006. 68:312–317.
Article
14. Te AE, Malloy TR, Stein BS, Ulchaker JC, Nseyo UO, Hai MA. Impact of prostate-specific antigen level and prostate volume as predictors of efficacy in photoselective vaporization prostatectomy: analysis and results of an ongoing prospective multicentre study at 3 years. BJU Int. 2006. 97:1229–1233.
Article
15. Bouchier-Hayes DM, Anderson P, Van Appledorn S, Bugeja P, Costello AJ. KTP laser versus transurethral resection: early results of a randomized trial. J Endourol. 2006. 20:580–585.
Article
16. Fu WJ, Hong BF, Wang XX, Yang Y, Cai W, Gao JP, et al. Evaluation of greenlight photoselective vaporization of the prostate for the treatment of high-risk patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Asian J Androl. 2006. 8:367–371.
Article
17. Kuntzman RS, Malek RS, Barrett DM, Bostwick DG. Potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser vaporization of the prostate: a comparative functional and pathologic study in canines. Urology. 1996. 48:575–583.
Article
18. Kuntzman RS, Malek RS, Barrett DM, Bostwick DG. Highpower (60-watt) potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser vaporization prostatectomy in living canines and in human and canine cadavers. Urology. 1997. 49:703–708.
Article
19. Lee R, Saini R, Zoltan E, Te AE. Photoselective vaporization of the prostate using a laser high performance system in the canine model. J Urol. 2008. 180:1551–1553.
Article
20. Spaliviero M, Araki M, Wong C. Short-term outcomes of Greenlight HPS laser photoselective vaporization prostatectomy (PVP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). J Endourol. 2008. 22:2341–2347.
21. Rieken M, Ebinger Mundorff N, Bonkat G, Wyler S, Bachmann A. Complications of laser prostatectomy: a review of recent data. World J Urol. 2010. 28:53–62.
Article
22. Krambeck AE, Handa SE, Lingerman JE. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for prostates larger than 175 grams. J Endourol. 2010. 24:433–437.
23. Du C, Jin X, Bai F, Qiu Y. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: the safety, efficacy, and learning experience in China. J Endourol. 2008. 22:1031–1036.
Article
24. Shingleton WB, Terrell F, Renfroe DL, Kolski JM, Fowler JE Jr. A randomized prospective study of laser ablation of the prostate versus transurethral resection of the prostate in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology. 1999. 54:1017–1021.
25. Shingleton WB, Renfroe LD, Kolski JM, Fowler JE Jr. A randomized prospective study of transurethral electrovaporization vs. laser ablation of the prostate in men with benign prostatic hypertrophy. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1998. 32:266–269.
Article
26. Bachmann A, Schürch L, Ruszat R, Wyler SF, Seifert HH, Müller A, et al. Photoselective vaporization (PVP) versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP): a prospective bi-centre study of perioperative morbidity and early functional outcome. Eur Urol. 2005. 48:965–971.
Article
27. Reich O, Bachmann A, Schneede P, Zaak D, Sulser T, Hofstetter A. Experimental comparison of high power (80 W) potassium titanyl phosphate laser vaporization and transurethral resection of the prostate. J Urol. 2004. 171:2502–2504.
Article
28. Paick JS, Um JM, Kim SW, Ku JH. Influence of high-power potassium-titanyl-phosphate photoselective vaporization of the prostate on erectile function: a short-term follow-up study. J Sex Med. 2007. 4:1701–1707.
Article
29. Naspro R, Bachmann A, Gilling P, Kuntz R, Madersbacher S, Montorsi F, et al. A review of the recent evidence (2006-2008) for 532-nm photoselective laser vaporization and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. Eur Urol. 2009. 55:1345–1357.
Article
Full Text Links
  • YMJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr