J Korean Med Sci.  2013 Jul;28(7):970-971. 10.3346/jkms.2013.28.7.970.

Peer Review in Scholarly Biomedical Journals: a Few Things that Make a Big Difference

• Gasparyan

• KMID: 1777487
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2013.28.7.970

Abstract

No abstract available.

MeSH Terms

*Biomedical Research
*Peer Review
Periodicals as Topic
Publishing

Reference

1. Ardakan MA, Mirzaie SA, Sheikhshoaei F. The peer-review process for articles in Iran's scientific journals. J Sch Pub. 2011; 42:243–261.

2. Marušić A. Editors as gatekeepers of responsible science. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2010; 20:282–287.

3. Satyanarayana K, Sharma A. Biomedical Journals in India: some critical concerns. Indian J Med Res. 2010; 132:119–122.

4. Jackson JL, Srinivasan M, Rea J, Fletcher KE, Kravitz RL. The validity of peer review in a general medicine journal. PLoS One. 2011; 6:e22475.

5. Gasparyan AY. Combining science editors' and clinicians' efforts to advance writing and editing skills. Eur Sci Ed. 2011; 37:102–103.

6. Salager-Meyer F. The importance of medical case reports. Eur Sci Ed. 2012; 38:38–39.

7. Marušiæ M, Martiniæ Blase E, Marušiæ A. Croatian Medical Journal at the turn of the millennium. Croat Med J. 2000; 41:5–27.

8. Bornmann L, Mungra P. Improving peer review in scholarly journals. Eur Sci Ed. 2011; 37:41–43.

9. Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Blackmore H, Kitas GD. Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors. Rheumatol Int. 2011; 31:1409–1417.

10. Shashok K, Handjani F. Enhancing the Quality of Research Publication: AuthorAID in the Eastern Mediterranean. J Tehran Heart Cent. 2010; 5:169–171.

11. Barroga EF, Turner RJ, Breugelmans R, Barron JP. An adaptable model of electronic editorial services for medical universities. Eur Sci Ed. 2012; 38:32–35.

12. Marusić M, Sambunjak D, Marusić A. Guide for peer reviewers of scientific articles in the Croatian Medical Journal. Croat Med J. 2005; 46:326–332.