Yonsei Med J.  2012 Nov;53(6):1136-1141. 10.3349/ymj.2012.53.6.1136.

Practice Patterns of Korean Urologists for Screening and Managing Prostate Cancer according to PSA Level

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Urology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. chung646@yuhs.ac
  • 2Department of Urology, Ajou University College of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
  • 3Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
  • 4Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
  • 5Department of Urology, Busan Paik Hospital, Busan, Korea.
  • 6Department of Urology, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
  • 7GSK Inc., Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
There are still debates on the benefit of mass screening for prostate cancer (PCA) by prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing, and on systemized surveillance protocols according to PSA level. Furthermore, there is a paucity of literature on current practice patterns according to PSA level in the Korean urologic field. Here, we report the results of a nationwide, multicenter, retrospective chart-review study.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Overall 2122 Korean men (>40 years old, PSA >2.5 ng/mL) were included in our study (from 122 centers, in 2008). The primary endpoint was to analyze the rate of prostate biopsy according to PSA level. Secondary aims were to analyze the detection rate of PCA, the clinical features of patients, and the status of surveillance for PCA according to PSA level.
RESULTS
The rate of prostate biopsy was 7.1%, 26.3%, 54.2%, and 64.3% according to PSA levels of 2.5-3.0, 3.0-4.0, 4.0-10.0, and >10.0 ng/mL, respectively, and the PCA detection rate was 16.0%, 22.2%, 20.2%, and 59.6%, respectively. At a PSA level >4.0 ng/mL, we found a lower incidence of prostate biopsy in local clinics than in general hospitals (21.6% vs. 66.2%, respectively). A significant proportion (16.6%) of patients exhibited high Gleason scores (> or =8) even in the group with low PSA values (2.5-4.0 ng/mL).
CONCLUSION
We believe that the results from this nationwide study might provide an important database for the establishment of practical guidelines for the screening and management of PCA in Korean populations.

Keyword

Mass screening; prostate biopsy; prostate specific antigen

MeSH Terms

Aged
Asian Continental Ancestry Group
Biopsy
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Physicians
Prostate-Specific Antigen/*blood
Prostatic Neoplasms/*blood/*diagnosis
Retrospective Studies
Urology

Reference

1. Parker SL, Tong T, Bolden S, Wingo PA. Cancer statistics, 1997. CA Cancer J Clin. 1997. 47:5–27.
Article
2. Brawley OW. Prostate carcinoma incidence and patient mortality: the effects of screening and early detection. Cancer. 1997. 80:1857–1863.
3. Jung KW, Park S, Kong HJ, Won YJ, Boo YK, Shin HR, et al. Cancer statistics in Korea: incidence, mortality and survival in 2006-2007. J Korean Med Sci. 2010. 25:1113–1121.
Article
4. Song C, Ahn H, Lee MS, Park J, Kwon TG, Kim HJ, et al. Mass screening for prostate cancer in Korea: a population based study. J Urol. 2008. 180:1949–1952.
Article
5. Wang MC, Valenzuela LA, Murphy GP, Chu TM. Purification of a human prostate specific antigen. Invest Urol. 1979. 17:159–163.
Article
6. Oesterling JE. Prostate specific antigen: a critical assessment of the most useful tumor marker for adenocarcinoma of the prostate. J Urol. 1991. 145:907–923.
Article
7. Partin AW, Oesterling JE. The clinical usefulness of prostate specific antigen: update 1994. J Urol. 1994. 152(5 Pt 1):1358–1368.
Article
8. Glenski WJ, Malek RS, Myrtle JF, Oesterling JE. Sustained, substantially increased concentration of prostate-specific antigen in the absence of prostatic malignant disease: an unusual clinical scenario. Mayo Clin Proc. 1992. 67:249–252.
Article
9. Hudson MA, Bahnson RR, Catalona WJ. Clinical use of prostate specific antigen in patients with prostate cancer. J Urol. 1989. 142:1011–1017.
Article
10. Oesterling JE, Kumamoto Y, Tsukamoto T, Girman CJ, Guess HA, Masumori N, et al. Serum prostate-specific antigen in a community-based population of healthy Japanese men: lower values than for similarly aged white men. Br J Urol. 1995. 75:347–353.
Article
11. Choi YD, Kang DR, Nam CM, Kim YS, Cho SY, Kim SJ, et al. Age-specific prostate-specific antigen reference ranges in Korean men. Urology. 2007. 70:1113–1116.
Article
12. Seo HK, Chung MK, Ryu SB, Lee KH. Korean Urological Oncologic Society Prostate Cancer Study Group. Detection rate of prostate cancer according to prostate-specific antigen and digital rectal examination in Korean men: a nationwide multicenter study. Urology. 2007. 70:1109–1112.
Article
13. Chung JS, Choi HY, Song HR, Byun SS, Seo SI, Song C, et al. Nomogram to predict insignificant prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy in Korean men: a multi-center study. Yonsei Med J. 2011. 52:74–80.
Article
14. Choi YD, Hong SJ, Rha KH, Kim BH, Cha KB, Song JS, et al. Age-specific reference ranges for serum prostate-specific antigen: community-based survey in namhae region. Korean J Urol. 2001. 42:834–839.
15. Oesterling JE, Jacobsen SJ, Chute CG, Guess HA, Girman CJ, Panser LA, et al. Serum prostate-specific antigen in a community-based population of healthy men. Establishment of age-specific reference ranges. JAMA. 1993. 270:860–864.
Article
16. Kao CH. Age-related free PSA, total PSA and free PSA/total PSA ratios: establishment of reference ranges in Chinese males. Anticancer Res. 1997. 17:1361–1365.
17. Lee TK, Chung TG, Kim CS. Age-specific reference ranges for prostate specific antigen from a health center in Korea. Korean J Urol. 1999. 40:583–588.
18. Schröder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, Tammela TL, Ciatto S, Nelen V, et al. Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. N Engl J Med. 2009. 360:1320–1328.
Article
19. Andriole GL, Crawford ED, Grubb RL 3rd, Buys SS, Chia D, Church TR, et al. Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial. N Engl J Med. 2009. 360:1310–1319.
Article
20. Catalona WJ, Hudson MA, Scardino PT, Richie JP, Ahmann FR, Flanigan RC, et al. Selection of optimal prostate specific antigen cutoffs for early detection of prostate cancer: receiver operating characteristic curves. J Urol. 1994. 152(6 Pt 1):2037–2042.
Article
21. Burden HP, Davis CR, Tate S, Persad R, Holmes CH, Whittington K. The trends in prostate specific antigen usage amongst United Kingdom urologists--a questionnaire based study. BMC Urol. 2008. 8:17.
22. Leippold T, Preusser S, Engeler D, Inhelder F, Schmid HP. Prostate biopsy in Switzerland: a representative survey on how Swiss urologists do it. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2008. 42:18–23.
Article
23. Song C, Ro JY, Lee MS, Hong SJ, Chung BH, Choi HY, et al. Prostate cancer in Korean men exhibits poor differentiation and is adversely related to prognosis after radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2006. 68:820–824.
Article
24. Egawa S, Suyama K, Arai Y, Tsukayama C, Matsumoto K, Kuwao S, et al. Treatment outcome by risk group after radical prostatectomy in Japanese men. Int J Urol. 2001. 8:295–300.
Article
25. Hsu YS, Wang JS, Wu TT. E-cadherin expression in prostate adenocarcinomas in Chinese and its pathological correlates. Urol Int. 2004. 73:36–40.
Article
26. Freedland SJ, Mangold LA, Walsh PC, Partin AW. The prostatic specific antigen era is alive and well: prostatic specific antigen and biochemical progression following radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2005. 174(4 Pt 1):1276–1281.
Article
27. Stephan C, Klaas M, Müller C, Schnorr D, Loening SA, Jung K. Interchangeability of measurements of total and free prostate-specific antigen in serum with 5 frequently used assay combinations: an update. Clin Chem. 2006. 52:59–64.
Article
Full Text Links
  • YMJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr