Skip Navigation
Skip to contents
Results by Year

View Wide

Filter

ARTICLE TYPE

PUBLICATION DATE

5 results
Display

Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: time for a new standard of care for cervical cancer?

Sakuragi N

No abstract available.
CITED
export Copy
Close
SHARE
Twitter Facebook
Close
Urodynamic study of bladder function following nerve sparing radical hysterectomy

Maneschi F

No abstract available.
CITED
export Copy
Close
SHARE
Twitter Facebook
Close
Various types of total laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomies and their effects on bladder function

Kanao H, Fujiwara K, Ebisawa K, Hada T, Ota Y, Andou M

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to ascertain the correlation between preserved pelvic nerve networks and bladder function after laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy. METHODS: Between 2009 and 2011, 53 patients underwent total...
CITED
export Copy
Close
SHARE
Twitter Facebook
Close
Efficacy and oncologic safety of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a randomized controlled trial

Roh JW, Lee DO, Suh DH, Lim MC, Seo SS, Chung J, Lee S, Park SY

OBJECTIVE: A prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (NSRH) in preserving bladder function and its oncologic safety in the treatment of cervical...
CITED
export Copy
Close
SHARE
Twitter Facebook
Close
Conventional versus nerve-sparing radical surgery for cervical cancer: a meta-analysis

Kim HS, Kim K, Ryoo SB, Seo JH, Kim SY, Park JW, Kim MA, Hong KS, Jeong CW, Song YS, FUSION Study Group

OBJECTIVE: Although nerve-sparing radical surgery (NSRS) is an emerging technique for reducing surgery-related dysfunctions, its efficacy is controversial in patients with cervical cancer. Thus, we performed a meta-analysis to compare...
CITED
export Copy
Close
SHARE
Twitter Facebook
Close

Go to Top

Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr