Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Imaging Sci Dent.  2025 Dec;55(4):322-334. 10.5624/isd.20250101.

Artificial intelligence for detection and classification of furcation defects using radiographic imaging: A systematic review

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Implant Biology, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
  • 2Division of Periodontology, Department of Developmental and Surgical Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
  • 3Centre for Oral Immunobiology and Regenerative Medicine and Centre for Oral Clinical Research, Institute of Dentistry, Queen Mary University London, London, UK
  • 4School of Dentistry, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
  • 5Hamdan Bin Mohammed College of Dental Medicine, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai, United Arab Emirates

Abstract

Purpose
This systematic review aimed to identify, appraise, and synthesize evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms for detecting and classifying furcation defects on radiographic images, addressing limitations of traditional methods.
Materials and Methods
A comprehensive search of databases and registers was conducted through April 2025. Inclusion criteria comprised diagnostic accuracy studies evaluating AI algorithms against a reference standard (clinical examination, expert consensus, or surgical findings) for furcation defect detection/classification on dental radiographs. Risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2. Because of study heterogeneity, a meta-analysis was not performed.
Results
Eight retrospective studies were included, utilizing various AI algorithms (e.g., ResNet, UNet, YOLO-v4, Vision Transformers) and radiographic modalities (periapical, panoramic, CBCT). Studies employing advanced deep learning models on 2D radiographs generally reported high diagnostic accuracy for detecting furcation involvement, with several reporting high sensitivity, specificity, and AUC values. However, performance varied by AI model and imaging modality. Proprietary AI tools showed suboptimal results in some studies. Classification of furcation severity was less consistently reported.
Conclusion
AI algorithms, particularly advanced deep learning models applied to well-annotated 2D radiographs, show promise for accurate furcation defect detection. Nonetheless, the field exhibits methodological and reporting heterogeneity. Future research should prioritize standardized protocols, direct comparisons with clinicians, and development of clinically translatable AI tools to improve early and accurate diagnosis of furcation involvement.

Keyword

Artificial Intelligence; Algorithms; Periodontitis; Furcation Defects; Systematic Review
Full Text Links
  • ISD
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2026 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr