Ewha Med J.  2022 Oct;45(4):e9. 10.12771/emj.2022.e9.

Is It a Refractory Disease?- Fecal Incontinence; beyond Medication

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Surgery, Pohang Naval Hospital, Pohang, Korea
  • 2Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

Fecal incontinence (FI) is recurrent uncontrolled passage of fecal material in patients. The life expectancy of humans has increased. Elderly patients have a significant rate of FI. Therefore, the number of patients with FI will increase. For diagnosis of FI, the digital rectal exam, ultrasonography, and anal manometry are used. In addition, the severity of FI can be assessed using the FI score system by examining symptoms. Recent applications include three-dimensional ultrasonography and other novel approaches. The treatments for FI include biofeedback therapy, anal implant, artificial sphincter, nerve modulation, SECCA, stem cell therapy, and surgical intervention. Biofeedback therapy is a noninvasive procedure. Anal implant, stem cell therapy, and SECCA are all minimally invasive treatments. And more methods constitute intrusive treatment. None of these therapies has been conclusively demonstrated to be superior. Depending on the severity of the symptoms, a non-invasive approach or an intrusive treatment is most frequently employed. In this review, I will discuss the diagnosis and treatment options for FI.

Keyword

Fecal incontinence; Treatment outcome; Implantable neurostimulators; Surgery; Stem cell transplantation

Figure

  • Fig. 1. 3D-pelvic floor ultrasonography. (A) Minimal levator hiatus (MLH), (B) mild levator ani deficiency (LAD) score, (C) severe LAD score, (D) levator ani muscle avulsion. Red dot-ted line, MLH area; asterisk, avulsion site. A, anus; PR, puborectalis muscle; PS, pubic symphysis; PV, pubovisceralis muscle; V, vaginal [31]. Adapted from Jeong et al. [31] with CC-BY-NC.

  • Fig. 2. Biofeedback therapy. An electrical device capable of monitoring the physiological activity of the anus is attached to the patient. The patient looks at the monitor and practices contraction and relaxation of the anus.

  • Fig. 3. Sacral nerve stimulation. An electrical device is inserted in subcutaneous of patient's lumbar region. This device controls the anus by providing electrical stimulation to the sacral nerve and its associated muscles.

  • Fig. 4. Anal plug. This device is designed for self-insertion and natural expulsion with defecation.

  • Fig. 5. Vaginal bowel control system. (A) Vaginal bowel control system. (B) It is a balloon-shaped structure that is inserted into the vagina. By applying pressure by hand, the balloon inflates and pressure is applied to the rectum to control the stool.

  • Fig. 6. SECCA procedure. A device that uses temperature-controlled radiofrequency energy is inserted into the anus of the patient. This device stimulates the patient's anus, causing the anal sphincter to tighten.

  • Fig. 7. Artificial sphincter. A cuff-shaped structure is wrapped around the anus and inserted (A) male, (B) female. Continence is maintained normally. Patient needs to press the pump located in the testicles or perineum for defecation. Then, cuff is closed naturally after defecation.

  • Fig. 8. Transposition of gracilis muscle. (A) This procedure is mobilization of the gracilis muscle, (B) transposition of the muscle around the anus and fixation to the contralateral ischial tuberosity.


Reference

References

1. Menees S, Chey WD. Fecal incontinence: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and updated treatment strategies. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2022; 51(1):71–91. DOI: 10.1016/j.gtc.2021.10.005. PMID: 35135666.
2. Ditah I, Devaki P, Luma HN, Ditah C, Njei B, Jaiyeoba C, et al. Prevalence, trends, and risk factors for fecal incontinence in United States adults, 2005–2010. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014; 12(4):636–643. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.07.020. PMID: 23906873.
3. Nelson RL. Epidemiology of fecal incontinence. Gastroenterology. 2004; 126(1):Suppl 1. S3–S7. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.010. PMID: 14978632.
Article
4. Whitehead WE, Borrud L, Goode PS, Meikle S, Mueller ER, Tuteja A, et al. Fecal incontinence in US adults: epidemiology and risk factors. Gastroenterology. 2009; 137(2):512–517. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.04.054. PMID: 19410574. PMCID: PMC2748224.
Article
5. Piozzi GN, Kim SH. Robotic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: technical controversies and a systematic review on the perioperative, oncological, and functional outcomes. Ann Coloproctol. 2021; 37(6):351–367. DOI: 10.3393/ac.2021.00836.0119. PMID: 34784706. PMCID: PMC8717069.
Article
6. Eldamshety O, Kotb S, Khater A, Roshdy S, Elnahas W, Zahi MS, et al. Early and late functional outcomes of anal sphincter-sparing procedures with total mesorectal excision for anorectal adenocarcinoma. Ann Coloproctol. 2020; 36(3):148–154. DOI: 10.3393/ac.2018.07.19. PMID: 32311866. PMCID: PMC7392569.
Article
7. Muñoz-Duyos A, Lagares-Tena L, Ribas Y, Baanante JC, Navarro-Luna A. Critical appraisal of international guidelines for the management of fecal incontinence in adults: is it possible to define what to do in different clinical scenarios? Tech Coloproctol. 2022; 26(1):1–17. DOI: 10.1007/s10151-021-02544-2. PMID: 34767095. PMCID: PMC8587500.
Article
8. Irei Y, Takano S, Yamada K. Propiverine hydrochloride as a treatment for fecal incontinence. Ann Coloproctol. 2020; 36(2):88–93. DOI: 10.3393/ac.2019.09.30.2. PMID: 32178499. PMCID: PMC7299569.
Article
9. De Ligny WR, Kerkhof MH, Ruiz-Zapata AM. Regenerative medicine as a therapeutic option for fecal incontinence: a systematic review of preclinical and clinical studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 220(2):142–154. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.009. PMID: 30267651.
10. Schmulson MJ, Drossman DA. What is new in Rome IV. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017; 23(2):151–163. DOI: 10.5056/jnm16214. PMID: 28274109. PMCID: PMC5383110.
Article
11. Simren M, Palsson OS, Whitehead WE. Update on Rome IV criteria for colorectal disorders: implications for clinical practice. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2017; 19(4):15. DOI: 10.1007/s11894-017-0554-0. PMID: 28374308. PMCID: PMC5378729.
12. Whitehead WE, Simren M, Busby-Whitehead J, Heymen S, van Tilburg MAL, Sperber AD, et al. Fecal incontinence diagnosed by the Rome IV criteria in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020; 18(2):385–391. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.05.040. PMID: 31154029.
Article
13. Rao SSC. Diagnosis and management of fecal incontinence. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004; 99(8):1585–1604. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.40105.x. PMID: 15307881.
Article
14. Ruiz NS, Kaiser AM. Fecal incontinence - challenges and solutions. World J Gastroenterol. 2017; 23(1):11–24. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i1.11. PMID: 28104977. PMCID: PMC5221273.
Article
15. Brown HW, Dyer KY, Rogers RG. Management of fecal incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 136(4):811–822. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004054. PMID: 32925633.
Article
16. Yu SWB, Rao SSC. Anorectal physiology and pathophysiology in the elderly. Clin Geriatr Med. 2014; 30(1):95–106. DOI: 10.1016/j.cger.2013.10.003. PMID: 24267605. PMCID: PMC3910254.
17. Pinsk I, Czeiger D, Lichtman D, Reshef A. The long-term effect of standardized anal dilatation for chronic anal fissure on anal continence. Ann Coloproctol. 2021; 37(2):115–119. DOI: 10.3393/ac.2020.03.16. PMID: 32178506. PMCID: PMC8134927.
Article
18. Egal A, Etienney I, Atienza P. Endorectal advancement flap with muscular plication in anovaginal and anterior perineal fistulas. Ann Coloproctol. 2021; 37(3):141–145. DOI: 10.3393/ac.2020.04.10.1. PMID: 32674556. PMCID: PMC8273710.
19. Lee KH, Hyun K, Yoon SG, Lee JK. Minimal lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS): is it enough to cut less than the conventional tailored LIS? Ann Coloproctol. 2021; 37(5):275–280. DOI: 10.3393/ac.2020.00976.0139. PMID: 34246204. PMCID: PMC8566144.
Article
20. Lopez MPJ, Onglao MAS, Monroy Iii HJ. Initial experience with video-assisted anal fistula treatment in the Philippines. Ann Coloproctol. 2020; 36(2):112–118. DOI: 10.3393/ac.2020.02.28. PMID: 32178505. PMCID: PMC7299567.
Article
21. Wallenhorst T, Bouguen G, Brochard C, Cunin D, Desfourneaux V, Ropert A, et al. Long-term impact of full-thickness rectal prolapse treatment on fecal incontinence. Surgery. 2015; 158(1):104–111. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.03.005. PMID: 25869649.
Article
22. Markland AD, Dunivan GC, Vaughan CP, Rogers RG. Anal intercourse and fecal incontinence: evidence from the 2009–2010 national health and nutrition examination survey. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016; 111(2):269–274. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2015.419. PMID: 26753893. PMCID: PMC5231615.
Article
23. Shin GH, Toto EL, Schey R. Pregnancy and postpartum bowel changes: constipation and fecal incontinence. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015; 110(4):521–529. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2015.76. PMID: 25803402.
Article
24. Ternent CA, Fleming F, Welton ML, Buie WD, Steele S, Rafferty J. Clinical practice guideline for ambulatory anorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015; 58(10):915–922. DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000451. PMID: 26347962.
25. Paquette IM, Varma MG, Kaiser AM, Steele SR, Rafferty JF. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons’ clinical practice guideline for the treatment of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015; 58(7):623–636. DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000397. PMID: 26200676.
Article
26. Lewis SJ, Heaton KW. Stool form scale as a useful guide to intestinal transit time. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1997; 32(9):920–924. DOI: 10.3109/00365529709011203. PMID: 9299672.
27. Jorge MJN, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993; 36(1):77–97. DOI: 10.1007/BF02050307. PMID: 8416784.
Article
28. Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, Kamm MA. Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut. 1999; 44(1):77–80. DOI: 10.1136/gut.44.1.77. PMID: 9862829. PMCID: PMC1760067.
Article
29. Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW, Kane RL, Mavrantonis C, Thorson AG, et al. Fecal incontinence quality of life scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000; 43(1):9–16. DOI: 10.1007/BF02237236. PMID: 10813117.
30. Alavi K, Chan S, Wise P, Kaiser AM, Sudan R, Bordeianou L. Fecal incontinence: etiology, diagnosis, and management. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015; 19(10):1910–1921. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-015-2905-1. PMID: 26268955.
Article
31. Jeong HY, Yang SJ, Cho DH, Park DH, Lee JK. Comparison of 3-dimensional pelvic floor ultrasonography and defecography for assessment of posterior pelvic floor disorders. Ann Coloproctol. 2020; 36(4):256–263. DOI: 10.3393/ac.2020.02.09. PMID: 32178497. PMCID: PMC7508475.
Article
32. Yune Y, Jeong HY, Park DH, Lee JK. Three-dimensional pelvic floor ultrasound assessment of pelvic organ prolapse: minimal levator hiatus and levator ani deficiency score. Ann Coloproctol. 2021; 37(5):291–297. DOI: 10.3393/ac.2020.01095.0156. PMID: 34376023. PMCID: PMC8566146.
Article
33. Fitzpatrick M, O’brien C, O’connell PR, O’herlihy C. Patterns of abnormal pudendal nerve function that are associated with postpartum fecal incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 189(3):730–735. DOI: 10.1067/S0002-9378(03)00817-2.
Article
34. Meyer I, Richter HE. Accidental bowel leakage/fecal incontinence: evidence-based management. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2021; 48(3):467–485. DOI: 10.1016/j.ogc.2021.05.003. PMID: 34416932.
35. Norton C, Cody JD. Biofeedback and/or sphincter exercises for the treatment of faecal incontinence in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 11(7):CD002111. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002111.pub3. PMID: 22786479.
36. Eric Jelovsek J, Markland AD, Whitehead WE, Barber MD, Newman DK, Rogers RG, et al. Controlling faecal incontinence in women by performing anal exercises with biofeedback or loperamide: a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019; 4(9):698–710. DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30193-1.
37. Tjandra JJ, Dykes SL, Kumar RR, Ellis CN, Gregorcyk SG, Hyman NH, et al. Practice parameters for the treatment of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007; 50(10):1497–1507. DOI: 10.1007/s10350-007-9001-x. PMID: 17674106.
38. Katuwal B, Bhullar J. Current position of sacral neuromodulation in treatment of fecal incontinence. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2021; 34(1):22–27. DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1714247. PMID: 33536846. PMCID: PMC7843948.
39. De Wachter S, Knowles CH, Elterman DS, Kennelly MJ, Lehur PA, Matzel KE, et al. New technologies and applications in sacral neuromodulation: an update. Adv Ther. 2020; 37:637–643. DOI: 10.1007/s12325-019-01205-z. PMID: 31875299. PMCID: PMC7004424.
Article
40. Thaha MA, Abukar AA, Thin NN, Ramsanahie A, Knowles CH. Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence and constipation in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; (8):CD004464. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004464.pub3. PMID: 26299888. PMCID: PMC9208727.
41. Knowles CH, Horrocks EJ, Bremner SA, Stevens N, Norton C, O’Connell PR, et al. Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus sham electrical stimulation for the treatment of faecal incontinence in adults (CONFIDeNT): a double-blind, multicentre, pragmatic, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015; 386(10004):1640–1648. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60314-2.
Article
42. Lukacz ES, Segall MM, Wexner SD. Evaluation of an anal insert device for the conservative management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015; 58(9):892–898. DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000427. PMID: 26252852.
Article
43. Maeda Y, Laurberg S, Norton C. Perianal injectable bulking agents as treatment for faecal incontinence in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; (2):CD007959. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007959.pub3. PMID: 23450581.
Article
44. Frascio M, Mandolfino F, Imperatore M, Stabilini C, Fornaro R, Gianetta E, et al. The SECCA procedure for faecal incontinence: a review. Colorectal Dis. 2013; 16(3):167–172. DOI: 10.1111/codi.12403. PMID: 24034552.
Article
45. Pakravan F, Helmes C. Magnetic anal sphincter augmentation in patients with severe fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015; 58(1):109–114. DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000263. PMID: 25489702.
Article
46. Wong WD, Congliosi SM, Spencer MP, Corman ML, Tan P, Opelka FG, et al. The safety and efficacy of the artificial bowel sphincter for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002; 45(9):1139–1153. DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-6381-z. PMID: 12352228.
Article
47. Trébol J, Carabias-Orgaz A, García-Arranz M, García-Olmo D. Stem cell therapy for faecal incontinence: current state and future perspectives. World J Stem Cells. 2018; 10(7):82–105. DOI: 10.4252/wjsc.v10.i7.82. PMID: 30079130. PMCID: PMC6068732.
Article
48. Forte ML, Andrade KE, Lowry AC, Butler M, Bliss DZ, Kane RL. Systematic review of surgical treatments for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016; 59(5):443–469. DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000594. PMID: 27050607.
49. Pla-Martí V, Martín-Arévalo J, Martí-Fernández R, Moro-Valdezate D, García-Botello S, Espí-Macías A, et al. Long-term evolution of continence and quality of life after sphincteroplasty for obstetric fecal incontinence. Ann Coloproctol. 2022; 38(1):13–19. DOI: 10.3393/ac.2020.09.16. PMID: 32972098. PMCID: PMC8898632.
Article
50. Kumar S, Medappil N, Singh SK, Chandra A. Complex obstetric perineal injury reconstruction using antropyloric valve transposition. Ann Coloproctol. 2020; 36(1):58–61. DOI: 10.3393/ac.2018.08.21. PMID: 32146790. PMCID: PMC7069671.
Article
Full Text Links
  • EMJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr