Clin Hypertens.  2022;28(1):31. 10.1186/s40885-022-00212-7.

Prediction of cardiovascular events by central blood pressure using radial tonometry in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medi‑ cine, St. Vincent’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • 2Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, St. Vincent’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • 3College of Medicine, Catholic Research Institute for Intractable Cardiovascular Disease, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Abstract

Background
High blood pressure (BP) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are major causes of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and heart failure (HF). Central blood pressure (CBP) is more predictive of ASCVD than is brachial BP; however, an association of CBP with ASCVD has not been found in T2DM patients. We evaluated the impact of CBP and the association between optimal level of noninvasively measured CBP and office BP in T2DM patients based on composite outcome of ASCVD, HF, and complications of hypertension.
Methods
Patients were enrolled from June 2011 to December 2015 and were followed up through December 2019. CBP was measured using radial tonometry. The primary endpoints were composite outcome of ASCVD, HF, and hypertension-induced complications such as left ventricular hypertrophy, retinopathy, and proteinuria.
Results
During the 6.5-year follow-up period, 515 patients were enrolled in the study. A total of 92 patients (17.9%) developed primary endpoints. The mean age of subjects was 61.3 ± 12.1 years and 55% (n = 283) were male. Patients who developed primary endpoints were older (65.3 ± 9.5 years vs. 60.5 ± 12.4 years) and had lower high-density lipoprotein (36.6 ± 9.4 mg/dL vs. 41.8 ± 11.1 mg/dL), higher CBP (123.6 ± 20.6 mmHg vs. 118.0 ± 20.6 mmHg), and higher pulse pressure (61.3 ± 16.6 mmHg vs. 56.5 ± 15.1 mmHg) than subjects without primary endpoint develop‑ ment. After adjustment for various risk factors, CBP was an independent predictor for primary endpoints (hazard ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.02–1.27; P = 0.016). In addition, the association of CBP and primary endpoints showed a U-shaped curve with the lowest incidence at CBP 118 mmHg and systolic BP about 128 mmHg.
Conclusions
We show the importance of CBP measurements in T2DM patients and present a cutoff value for ASCVD events and hypertension-induced complications.

Keyword

Hypertension; Central blood pressure; Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk assessment
Full Text Links
  • CH
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr