Korean J Anesthesiol.  2022 Aug;75(4):295-306. 10.4097/kja.22138.

Anatomical classification and clinical application of thoracic paraspinal blocks

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute, Translational Research Unit for Anatomy and Analgesia, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

Various techniques for regional anesthesia and analgesia of the thorax are currently being used in clinical practice. A recent international consensus has anatomically classified paraspinal blocks in the thoracic spinal region into the following four types: paravertebral, retrolaminar, erector spinae plane, and intertransverse process blocks. These blocks have different anatomical targets; thus, the spreading patterns of the injectates differ and can consequently exhibit different neural blockade characteristics. The paravertebral block directly targets the paravertebral space just outside the neuraxial region and has an analgesic efficacy comparable to that of the epidural block; however, there are multiple potential risks associated with this technique. Retrolaminar and erector spinae plane blocks target the erector spinae plane on the vertebral lamina and transverse process, respectively. In anatomical studies, these two blocks showed different injectate spreading patterns to the back muscles and the fascial plane. In cadaveric studies, paravertebral spread was identified, but variable. However, numerous clinical reports have shown paravertebral spread with erector spinae plane blocks. Both techniques have been found to reduce postoperative pain compared to controls; however, the results have been more inconsistent than with the paravertebral block. Finally, the intertransverse process block targets the tissue complex posterior to the superior costotransverse ligament. Anatomical studies have revealed that this block has pathways that are more direct and closer to the paravertebral space than the retrolaminar and erector spinae plane blocks. Cadaveric evaluations have consistently shown promising results; however, further clinical studies using this technique are needed to confirm these anatomical findings.

Keyword

Erector spinae plane block; Intertransverse process block; Nerve block; Pain management; Paraspinal block; Paravertebral block; Paravertebral space; Retrolaminar block; Ultrasonography

Cited by  3 articles

Current evidence of ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks for cardiac surgery: a narrative literature review
Boohwi Hong, Chahyun Oh, Yumin Jo, Soomin Lee, Seyeon Park, Yoon-Hee Kim
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2022;75(6):460-472.    doi: 10.4097/kja.22564.

Bolus intertransverse process block and continuous erector spinae plane block for perioperative analgesic management of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery - Three cases report –
Yuki Yamamoto, Nobuhiro Tanaka, Yuma Kadoya, Miki Umehara, Takanori Suzuka, Masahiko Kawaguchi
Anesth Pain Med. 2023;18(2):198-203.    doi: 10.17085/apm.22250.

Reply to letter to the editor: Inter-transverse process blocks: caution about difference in methods
Nobuhiro Tanaka, Yuma Kadoya, Takanori Suzuka, Masahiko Kawaguchi
Anesth Pain Med. 2024;19(1):68-69.    doi: 10.17085/apm.23121.

Full Text Links
  • KJAE
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr