Vasc Spec Int.  2022 Jun;38(2):16. 10.5758/vsi.220007.

Contemporary Unplanned Readmission Trends Following Management of Type B Aortic Dissection

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
  • 2Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
  • 3Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, NorthShore University HealthSystem, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Evanston, IL, USA

Abstract

Purpose
Large studies have demonstrated improved survival outcomes with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) at two and five years compared to medical therapy; however, early TEVAR for acute type B aortic dissection (TBAD) remains controversial. We aimed to evaluate trends and clinical predictors of hospital readmissions in patients undergoing medical management and TEVAR for acute TBADs.
Materials and Methods
The Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried for all 30-day and 90-day index readmissions (30D-IR and 90D-IR, respectively) after a diagnosis of a TBAD from January 2012 to September 2015. Data on readmission diagnosis, patient demographics, and hospital characteristics were collected from readmitted patients and analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify the predictors of readmission after TEVAR or medical medical management of TBAD.
Results
We identified 53,117 patients with acute TBAD. Medical management was the initial treatment modality in 46,985 (88.4%) patients, while 6,132 (11.5%) underwent TEVAR. Factors including older patient age, lower household income, severity of comorbidities, initial hospital length of stay, and urgent procedure demonstrated an increased likelihood of experiencing 30D-IR and 90D-IR (P<0.05). The rate of unplanned readmission for patients undergoing medical management remained stable (11.3% vs. 10.0% for 30D-IR; 19.1% vs. 15.5% for 90D-IR). Reasons for unplanned readmission in the TEVAR cohort were largely related to technical complications. There was no significant difference in readmission costs between medical management and TEVAR.
Conclusion
Number of unplanned readmissions in the TEVAR arm decreased significantly over time, whereas the number of readmissions for medical management remained stable.

Keyword

Aortic dissection; Thoracic endovascular aortic repair; Readmission; Type B dissection; Nationwide readmissions database
Full Text Links
  • VSI
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr