Korean J Pain.  2022 Apr;35(2):183-190. 10.3344/kjp.2022.35.2.183.

Comparison of ultrasound guided pulsed radiofrequency of genicular nerve with local anesthetic and steroid block for management of osteoarthritis knee pain

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
  • 2Department of Orthopedics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India

Abstract

Background
To compare ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) of the genicular nerve with the genicular nerve block using local anesthetic and steroid for management of osteoarthritis (OA) knee pain.
Methods
Thirty patients with OA knee were randomly allocated to receive either ultrasound-guided PRF of the genicular nerve (PRF group) or nerve block with bupivacaine and methylprednisolone acetate (local anesthetic steroid [LAS] group). Verbal numeric rating scale (VNRS) and Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores were measured at pre-procedure and 1-, 4-, and 12-weeks post-procedure.
Results
VNRS scores decreased significantly (P < 0.001) in both the groups at 12 weeks and other follow up times compared to baseline. Seventy-three percent of patients in the PRF group and 66% in the LAS group achieved effective pain relief (≥ 50% pain reduction) at 12 weeks (P > 0.999). There was also a statistically significant (P < 0.001) improvement in WOMAC scores in both groups at all follow up times. However, there was no intergroup difference in VNRS (P = 0.893) and WOMAC scores (P = 0.983). No complications were reported.
Conclusions
Both ultrasound-guided PRF of the genicular nerve and blocks of genicular nerve with local anesthetic and a steroid provided comparable pain relief without any complications. However, PRF of the genicular nerve is a procedure that takes much more time and equipment than the genicular nerve block.

Keyword

Anesthetics; Local; Chronic Pain; Knee; Nerve Block; Osteoarthritis; Pain Management; Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment; Steroids; Ultrasonography; Interventional

Figure

  • Fig. 1 CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) diagram showing flow of patients.

  • Fig. 2 Box plot analysis of VNRS scores at various time intervals. Boxplots show the median, interquartile range and outliers. Box edge indicates 25th and 75th percentiles, Whiskers indicate 5th and 95th percentiles. Red/blue dots represent outliers. Within group comparison, VNRS score were significant in both the PRF group and LAS group at various time interval of follow-up. Error bars indicate 95% confidence interval. VNRS: verbal numeric rating scale, PRF: pulsed radiofrequency, LAS: local anesthetic steroid. * indicates P < 0.001 compared to baseline in PRF group. $ indicates P < 0.001 compared to baseline in LAS group.

  • Fig. 3 Box plot analysis of WOMAC score at various time intervals. Boxplots show the median, interquartile range and outliers. Box edge indicates 25th and 75th percentiles, Whiskers indicate 5th and 95th percentiles. Red/blue dots represent outliers. Within group comparison, WOMAC score were significant in both the PRF group and LAS group at various time interval of follow-up. Error bars indicate 95% confidence interval. WOMAC: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index, PRF: pulsed radiofrequency, LAS: local anesthetic steroid. * indicates P < 0.05 compared to baseline in PRF group. $ indicates P < 0.05 compared to baseline in LAS group.


Cited by  2 articles

Predictive factors associated with successful response to utrasound guided genicular radiofrequency ablation
Selin Guven Kose, Halil Cihan Kose, Feyza Celikel, Omer Taylan Akkaya
Korean J Pain. 2022;35(4):447-457.    doi: 10.3344/kjp.2022.35.4.447.

Investigation of the existence of and a block technique for the inferior lateral genicular nerve: cadaveric study
Jiyoung Kim, Ji Yeong Kim, Hwa Yong Shin, Sung Eun Sim, Siwook Chung, Youngjae Jeon, Sang Hyun Kim, Jong Min Jeong, Jieun Kim, U-Young Lee, Hue Jung Park
Korean J Pain. 2023;36(3):328-334.    doi: 10.3344/kjp.23112.


Reference

1. Garstang SV, Stitik TP. 2006; Osteoarthritis: epidemiology, risk factors, and pathophysiology. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 85(11 Suppl):S2–11. DOI: 10.1097/01.phm.0000245568.69434.1a. PMID: 17079976.
2. Bijlsma JW, Berenbaum F, Lafeber FP. 2011; Osteoarthritis: an update with relevance for clinical practice. Lancet. 377:2115–26. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60243-2. PMID: 21684382.
Article
3. Dureja GP, Jain PN, Shetty N, Mandal SP, Prabhoo R, Joshi M, et al. 2014; Prevalence of chronic pain, impact on daily life, and treatment practices in India. Pain Pract. 14:E51–62. DOI: 10.1111/papr.12132. PMID: 24304963.
Article
4. Kess M, Stärke C, Henle P. 2017; [Unloading with insoles, orthotics and braces: pre-operative leg axis correction or independent treatment?]. Orthopade. 46:575–82. German. DOI: 10.1007/s00132-017-3438-y. PMID: 28589390.
5. Bozimowski G. 2015; A review of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. AANA J. 83:425–33. PMID: 26742337.
6. Bellamy N, Campbell J, Robinson V, Gee T, Bourne R, Wells G. 2006; Intraarticular corticosteroid for treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2):CD005328. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005328.pub2. PMID: 16625636.
Article
7. Rönn K, Reischl N, Gautier E, Jacobi M. 2011; Current surgical treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis. 2011:454873. DOI: 10.1155/2011/454873. PMID: 22046517. PMCID: PMC3200113.
Article
8. Hirasawa Y, Okajima S, Ohta M, Tokioka T. 2000; Nerve distribution to the human knee joint: anatomical and immunohistochemical study. Int Orthop. 24:1–4. DOI: 10.1007/s002640050001. PMID: 10774852. PMCID: PMC3619852.
Article
9. Vallejo R, Tilley DM, Williams J, Labak S, Aliaga L, Benyamin RM. 2013; Pulsed radiofrequency modulates pain regulatory gene expression along the nociceptive pathway. Pain Physician. 16:E601–13. DOI: 10.36076/ppj.2013/16/E601. PMID: 24077210.
10. Karaman H, Tüfek A, Kavak GÖ, Yildirim ZB, Uysal E, Celik F, et al. 2011; Intra-articularly applied pulsed radiofrequency can reduce chronic knee pain in patients with osteoarthritis. J Chin Med Assoc. 74:336–40. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcma.2011.06.004. PMID: 21872812.
Article
11. Chua NH, Vissers KC, Sluijter ME. 2011; Pulsed radiofrequency treatment in interventional pain management: mechanisms and potential indications-a review. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 153:763–71. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-010-0881-5. PMID: 21116663. PMCID: PMC3059755.
Article
12. Bhatia A, Peng P, Cohen SP. 2016; Radiofrequency procedures to relieve chronic knee pain: an evidence-based narrative review. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 41:501–10. DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000414. PMID: 27281721.
13. Kirdemir P, Çatav S, Alkaya Solmaz F. 2017; The genicular nerve: radiofrequency lesion application for chronic knee pain. Turk J Med Sci. 47:268–72. DOI: 10.3906/sag-1601-171. PMID: 28263500.
Article
14. Choi WJ, Hwang SJ, Song JG, Leem JG, Kang YU, Park PH, et al. 2011; Radiofrequency treatment relieves chronic knee osteoarthritis pain: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Pain. 152:481–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.09.029. PMID: 21055873.
Article
15. Kesikburun S, Yaşar E, Uran A, Adigüzel E, Yilmaz B. 2016; Ultrasound-guided genicular nerve pulsed radiofrequency treatment for painful knee osteoarthritis: a preliminary report. Pain Physician. 19:E751–9. DOI: 10.36076/ppj/2019.19.E751. PMID: 27389118.
16. Demir Y, Güzelküçük Ü, Tezel K, Aydemir K, Taşkaynatan MA. 2017; A different approach to the management of osteoarthritis in the knee: ultrasound guided genicular nerve block. Pain Med. 18:181–3. DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnw177. PMID: 27492742.
Article
17. Adiguzel E, Uran A, Kesikburun S, Köroğlu Ö, Demir Y, Yaşar E. 2015; Knee pain relief with genicular nerve blockage in two brain injured patients with heterotopic ossification. Brain Inj. 29:1736–9. DOI: 10.3109/02699052.2015.1075171. PMID: 26479687.
Article
18. Qudsi-Sinclair S, Borrás-Rubio E, Abellan-Guillén JF, Padilla Del Rey ML, Ruiz-Merino G. 2017; A comparison of genicular nerve treatment using either radiofrequency or analgesic block with corticosteroid for pain after a total knee arthroplasty: a double-blind, randomized clinical study. Pain Pract. 17:578–88. DOI: 10.1111/papr.12481. PMID: 27641918.
Article
19. Baron G, Tubach F, Ravaud P, Logeart I, Dougados M. 2007; Validation of a short form of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index function subscale in hip and knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 57:633–8. DOI: 10.1002/art.22685. PMID: 17471534.
Article
20. Yasar E, Kesikburun S, Kılıç C, Güzelküçük Ü, Yazar F, Tan AK. 2015; Accuracy of ultrasound-guided genicular nerve block: a cadaveric study. Pain Physician. 18:E899–904. DOI: 10.36076/ppj.2015/18/E899. PMID: 26431143.
21. Sweet WH, Wepsic JG. 1974; Controlled thermocoagulation of trigeminal ganglion and rootlets for differential destruction of pain fibers. 1. Trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg. 40:143–56. DOI: 10.3171/jns.1974.40.2.0143. PMID: 4587949.
22. Chang MC, Ahn SH. 2017; The effect of intra-articular stimulation by pulsed radiofrequency on chronic sacroiliac joint pain refractory to intra-articular corticosteroid injection: a retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore). 96:e7367. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007367. PMID: 28658160. PMCID: PMC5500082.
23. Kapural L, Vrooman B, Sarwar S, Krizanac-Bengez L, Rauck R, Gilmore C, et al. 2013; A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of transdiscal radiofrequency, biacuplasty for treatment of discogenic lower back pain. Pain Med. 14:362–73. DOI: 10.1111/pme.12023. PMID: 23279658.
Article
24. Santana Pineda MM, Vanlinthout LE, Moreno Martín A, van Zundert J, Rodriguez Huertas F, Novalbos Ruiz JP. 2017; Analgesic effect and functional improvement caused by radiofrequency treatment of genicular nerves in patients with advanced osteoarthritis of the knee until 1 year following treatment. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 42:62–8. DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000510. PMID: 27875368.
Article
25. Byrd D, Mackey S. 2008; Pulsed radiofrequency for chronic pain. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 12:37–41. DOI: 10.1007/s11916-008-0008-3. PMID: 18417022. PMCID: PMC2913603.
Article
26. Vas L, Pai R, Khandagale N, Pattnaik M. 2014; Pulsed radiofrequency of the composite nerve supply to the knee joint as a new technique for relieving osteoarthritic pain: a preliminary report. Pain Physician. 17:493–506. DOI: 10.36076/ppj.2014/17/494. PMID: 25415774.
27. Kim DH, Choi SS, Yoon SH, Lee SH, Seo DK, Lee IG, et al. 2018; Ultrasound-guided genicular nerve block for knee osteoarthritis: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial of local anesthetic alone or in combination with corticosteroid. Pain Physician. 21:41–52. DOI: 10.36076/ppj/2018.51. PMID: 29357330.
28. Sarı S, Aydın ON, Turan Y, Şen S, Özlülerden P, Ömürlü İK, et al. 2017; Which imaging method should be used for genicular nerve radio frequency thermocoagulation in chronic knee osteoarthritis? J Clin Monit Comput. 31:797–803. DOI: 10.1007/s10877-016-9886-9. PMID: 27142099.
Article
29. McCormick ZL, Reddy R, Korn M, Dayanim D, Syed RH, Bhave M, et al. 2018; A prospective randomized trial of prognostic genicular nerve blocks to determine the predictive value for the outcome of cooled radiofrequency ablation for chronic knee pain due to osteoarthritis. Pain Med. 19:1628–38. DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnx286. PMID: 29300971.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KJP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr