Healthc Inform Res.  2022 Jan;28(1):25-34. 10.4258/hir.2022.28.1.25.

Impact of Universal Suicide Risk Screening in a Pediatric Emergency Department: A Discrete Event Simulation Approach

Affiliations
  • 1Emergency Medicine Section of Data Analytics, Children’s National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
  • 2Department of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
  • 3Division of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Children’s National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
  • 4Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Sidra Medicina, Al Gharafa, Doha, Qatar
  • 5Emergency Medicine and Trauma Center, Children’s National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA

Abstract


Objectives
The aim of this study was to use discrete event simulation (DES) to model the impact of two universal suicide risk screening scenarios (emergency department [ED] and hospital-wide) on mean length of stay (LOS), wait times, and overflow of our secure patient care unit for patients being evaluated for a behavioral health complaint (BHC) in the ED of a large, academic children’s hospital.
Methods
We developed a conceptual model of BHC patient flow through the ED, incorporating anticipated system changes with both universal suicide risk screening scenarios. Retrospective site-specific patient tracking data from 2017 were used to generate model parameters and validate model output metrics with a random 50/50 split for derivation and validation data.
Results
The model predicted small increases (less than 1 hour) in LOS and wait times for our BHC patients in both universal screening scenarios. However, the days per year in which the ED experienced secure unit overflow increased (existing system: 52.9 days; 95% CI, 51.5–54.3 days; ED: 94.4 days; 95% CI, 92.6–96.2 days; and hospital-wide: 276.9 days; 95% CI, 274.8–279.0 days).
Conclusions
The DES model predicted that implementation of either universal suicide risk screening scenario would not severely impact LOS or wait times for BHC patients in our ED. However, universal screening would greatly stress our existing ED capacity to care for BHC patients in secure, dedicated patient areas by creating more overflow.

Keyword

Suicide; Mental Health; Emergency Department; Computer Simulation; Length of Stay

Figure

  • Figure 1 Conceptual model for pediatric emergency department (ED) evaluations of patients with behavioral health complaints.

  • Figure 2 Emergency department (ED) layout, including the secure patient care area dedicated to patients with behavioral health complaints, adjacent patient care locations (“Area C”), and the decontamination area, which serves as the primary overflow when the number of patients with behavioral health complaints exceeds the space available in secure patient areas.

  • Figure 3 Simio measure of risk and error (SMORE) plot, showing the number of days each year with overflow of patients with behavioral health complaints exceeding the capacity of secure patient care areas. The model outputs for our existing system, as well as models with universal emergency department (ED) screening and universal hospital-wide screening, are represented as a box-and-whisker plot demonstrating the differences in expected unit overflow between these models. The means are presented as orange circles, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) around means are represented by beige bars, and 95% CIs around the 25th and 75th percentiles are represented by blue bars.


Reference

References

1. Burstein B, Agostino H, Greenfield B. Suicidal attempts and ideation among children and adolescents in US Emergency Departments, 2007–2015. JAMA Pediatr. 2019; 173(6):598–600.
Article
2. Hedegaard H, Curtin SC, Warner M. Increase in suicide mortality in the United States, 1999–2018. NCHS Data Brief. 2020; (362):1–8.
3. The Joint Commission. Joint Commission Perspectives [Internet]. Washington (DC): The Joint Commission;2020. [cited at 2022 Jan 17]. Available from: https://www.jointcommission.org/-/media/tjc/documents/resources/patient-safety-topics/suicide-prevention/april2020_faq_suicideriskreductioninnonpsychiatricareas.pdf .
4. Fontanella CA, Warner LA, Steelesmith D, Bridge JA, Sweeney HA, Campo JV. Clinical profiles and health services patterns of medicaid-enrolled youths who died by suicide. JAMA Pediatr. 2020; 174(5):470–7.
Article
5. Ruch DA, Steelesmith DL, Warner LA, Bridge JA, Campo JV, Fontanella CA. Health services use by children in the welfare system who died by suicide. Pediatrics. 2021; 147(4):e2020011585.
Article
6. Detecting and treating suicide ideation in all settings. Sentinel Event Alert. 2016; (56):1–7.
7. Horowitz LM, Ballard ED, Pao M. Suicide screening in schools, primary care and emergency departments. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2009; 21(5):620–7.
Article
8. Babulak E, Wang M. Discrete event simulation: state of the art. Goti A, editor. Discrete event simulations. London, UK: InTech;2010.
Article
9. Genuis ED, Doan Q. The effect of medical trainees on pediatric emergency department flow: a discrete event simulation modeling study. Acad Emerg Med. 2013; 20(11):1112–20.
Article
10. The Joint Commission. Suicide prevention resources to support Joint Commission accredited organizations implementation of NPSG 15.01.01 [Internet]. Washington (DC): The Joint Commission;2018. [cited 2022 Jan 17]. Available from: https://www.jointcommission.org/-/media/tjc/documents/resources/patient-safety-topics/suicide-prevention/pages-from-suicide_prevention_compendium_5_11_20_updated-july2020_ep2.pdf .
11. Mundt JC, Greist JH, Gelenberg AJ, Katzelnick DJ, Jefferson JW, Modell JG. Feasibility and validation of a computer-automated Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale using interactive voice response technology. J Psychiatr Res. 2010; 44(16):1224–8.
Article
12. Roaten K, Johnson C, Genzel R, Khan F, North CS. Development and implementation of a universal suicide risk screening program in a safety-net hospital system. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2018; 44(1):4–11.
Article
13. Palmer S, Ipsen T. Caring for our children: a look at patient experience in a pediatric setting. Nashville (TN): The Beryl Institute;2020.
14. Chang AM, Lin A, Fu R, McConnell KJ, Sun B. Associations of emergency department length of stay with publicly reported quality-of-care measures. Acad Emerg Med. 2017; 24(2):246–50.
Article
15. Abo-Hamad W, Arisha A. Simulation-based framework to improve patient experience in an emergency department. Eur J Oper Res. 2013; 224(1):154–66.
Article
16. Leeb RT, Bitsko RH, Radhakrishnan L, Martinez P, Njai R, Holland KM. Mental health-related emergency department visits among children aged <18 years during the COVID-19 pandemic - United States, January 1–October 17, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020; 69(45):1675–80.
17. Wright JH, Caudill R. Remote treatment delivery in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychother Psychosom. 2020; 89(3):130–2.
Article
18. Lee J. Mental health effects of school closures during COVID-19. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020; 4(6):421.
Article
19. Adams JM, van Dahlen B. Preventing suicide in the United States. Public Health Rep. 2021; 136(1):3–5.
Article
20. Latif F, Patel S, Badolato G, McKinley K, Chan-Salcedo C, Bannerman R, et al. Improving Youth Suicide Risk Screening and Assessment in a Pediatric Hospital Setting by Using The Joint Commission Guidelines. Hosp Pediatr. 2020; 10(10):884–92.
Article
21. Fazel S, Runeson B. Suicide. N Engl J Med. 2020; 382(3):266–74.
Article
22. Stone DM, Simon TR, Fowler KA, Kegler SR, Yuan K, Holland KM, et al. Vital signs: trends in state suicide rates – United States, 1999–2016 and circumstances contributing to suicide - 27 states, 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018; 67(22):617–24.
23. Meadows Mental Health Policy Institute. Effects of a COVID-induced economic recession (COVID-19 Impact Series, Volume 1) [Internet]. Dallas (TX): Meadows Mental Health Policy Institute;2020. [cited at 2022 Jan 17]. Available from: https://mmhpi.org/topics/policy-research/covid-impact-series-volume1/ .
24. Reger MA, Stanley IH, Joiner TE. Suicide mortality and coronavirus disease 2019: a perfect storm? JAMA Psychiatry. 2020; 77(11):1093–4.
25. Kumar AP, Kapur R. Discrete simulation application-scheduling staff for the emergency room. In : Proceedings of the 21st Conference on Winter Simulation; 1989 Dec 4–6; Washington, DC. p. 1112–20.
Article
26. Day TE, Sarawgi S, Perri A, Nicolson SC. Reducing postponements of elective pediatric cardiac procedures: analysis and implementation of a discrete event simulation model. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015; 99(4):1386–91.
Article
27. McKinley KW, Babineau J, Roskind CG, Sonnett M, Doan Q. Discrete event simulation modelling to evaluate the impact of a quality improvement initiative on patient flow in a paediatric emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2020; 37(4):193–9.
Article
28. Rutberg MH, Wenczel S, Devaney J, Goldlust EJ, Day TE. Incorporating discrete event simulation into quality improvement efforts in health care systems. Am J Med Qual. 2015; 30(1):31–5.
Article
29. Halpern P, Goldberg SA, Keng JG, Koenig KL. Principles of emergency department facility design for optimal management of mass-casualty incidents. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2012; 27(2):204–12.
Article
30. McEnany FB, Ojugbele O, Doherty JR, McLaren JL, Leyenaar JK. Pediatric mental health boarding. Pediatrics. 2020; 146(4):e20201174.
Article
Full Text Links
  • HIR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr