J Korean Diabetes.  2021 Jun;22(2):105-112. 10.4093/jkd.2021.22.2.105.

Sulfonylurea, an Update

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Haundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea

Abstract

Sulfonylureas (SUs) are widely prescribed in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Despite the availability of several newer agents, SUs still play an important role in glucose-lowering therapy. However, over the last decade, there is a degrowth of older agents (SUs and thiazolidinediones) prescriptions with emergence of newer agents such as dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists. The role of SUs in modern clinical practice poses ongoing clinical debate. With active marketing of these newer drugs, the concerns regarding hypoglycemia, secondary failure and cardiovascular safety tend to be overstated, especially when considering SUs. Some evidence has suggested that modern SUs (such as gliclazide modified release and glimepiride) have lower hypoglycemia and secondary failure rates and decreased risk of mortality from all-cause and cardiovascular disease compared to conventional SUs in patients with type 2 diabetes. Appropriate clinical judgement coupled with a patient-centered approach is crucial to achieve the best outcome in patients with type 2 diabetes. Modern SUs should also be considered based on their safety, efficacy, and low cost when choosing anti-hyperglycemic agents.

Keyword

Cardiovascular diseases; Diabetes mellitus; type 2; insulin secretion

Reference

1. Butler AE, Janson J, Bonner-Weir S, Ritzel R, Rizza RA, Butler PC. Beta-cell deficit and increased beta-cell apoptosis in humans with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2003; 52:102–10.
2. World Health Organization. Diabetes fact sheet. No. 312. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2009.
3. Bressler R, Johnson DG. Pharmacological regulation of blood glucose levels in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Arch Intern Med. 1997; 157:836–48.
Article
4. Korean Diabetes Association. Diabetes fact sheet in Korea 2018. Seoul: Korean Diabetes Association;2018.
5. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet. 1998. 352:837–53.
6. Levine R. Sulfonylureas: background and development of the field. Diabetes Care. 1984; 7(Suppl 1):3–7.
7. Kreisberg RA. The second-generation sulfonylureas: change or progress? Ann Intern Med. 1985; 102:125–6.
Article
8. Kalra S, Aamir AH, Raza A, Das AK, Azad Khan AK, Shrestha D, et al. Place of sulfonylureas in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus in South Asia: a consensus statement. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2015; 19:577–96.
Article
9. Korean Diabetes Association. Diabetes. 5th ed.Seoul: Panmun Education;2018. p. 389–94.
10. Cordiner RLM, Pearson ER. Reflections on the sulphonylurea story: a drug class at risk of extinction or a drug class worth reviving? Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019; 21:761–71.
Article
11. Hirst JA, Farmer AJ, Dyar A, Lung TW, Stevens RJ. Estimating the effect of sulfonylurea on HbA1c in diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetologia. 2013; 56:973–84.
Article
12. Khunti K, Hassanein M, Lee MK, Mohan V, Amod A. Role of Gliclazide MR in the management of type 2 diabetes: report of a symposium on real-world evidence and new perspectives. Diabetes Ther. 2020; 11(Suppl 2):33–48.
Article
13. Diabetes Canada Clinical Practice Guidelines Expert Committee. Stone JA, Houlden RL, Lin P, Udell JA, Verma S. Cardiovascular protection in people with diabetes. Can J Diabetes. 2018. 42(Suppl 1):S1–325.
Article
14. Cosentino F, Grant PJ, Aboyans V, Bailey CJ, Ceriello A, Delgado V, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD. Eur Heart J. 2020; 41:255–323.
15. Davies MJ, D'Alessio DA, Fradkin J, Kernan WN, Mathieu C, Mingrone G, et al. Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetologia. 2018; 61:2461–98.
Article
16. Vaccaro O, Masulli M, Nicolucci A, Bonora E, Del Prato S, Maggioni AP, et al. Effects on the incidence of cardiovascular events of the addition of pioglitazone versus sulfonylureas in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin (TOSCA. IT): a randomised, multicentre trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017; 5:887–97.
17. Monami M, Genovese S, Mannucci E. Cardiovascular safety of sulfonylureas: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013; 15:938–53.
Article
18. Azoulay L, Suissa S. Sulfonylureas and the risks of cardiovascular events and death: a methodological meta-regression analysis of the observational studies. Diabetes Care. 2017; 40:706–14.
Article
19. Rosenstock J, Kahn SE, Johansen OE, Zinman B, Espeland MA, Woerle HJ, et al. Effect of linagliptin vs glimepiride on major adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: the CAROLINA randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019; 322:1155–66.
20. ADVANCE Collaborative Group. Patel A, MacMahon S, Chalmers J, Neal B, Billot L, et al. Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008. 358:2560–72.
Article
21. Simpson SH, Lee J, Choi S, Vandermeer B, Abdelmoneim AS, Featherstone TR. Mortality risk among sulfonylureas: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015; 3:43–51.
Article
22. International Hypoglycaemia Study Group. Hypoglycaemia, cardiovascular disease, and mortality in diabetes: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and management. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019. 7:385–96.
23. Rosenstock J, Perkovic V, Johansen OE, Cooper ME, Kahn SE, Marx N, et al. Effect of linagliptin vs placebo on major cardiovascular events in adults with type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular and renal risk: the CARMELINA randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019; 321:69–79.
24. Shorr RI, Ray WA, Daugherty JR, Griffin MR. Incidence and risk factors for serious hypoglycemia in older persons using insulin or sulfonylureas. Arch Intern Med. 1997; 157:1681–6.
Article
25. Dunkley AJ, Fitzpatrick C, Gray LJ, Waheed G, Heller SR, Frier BM, et al. Incidence and severity of hypoglycaemia in type 2 diabetes by treatment regimen: a UK multisite 12-month prospective observational study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019; 21:1585–95.
Article
26. Maloney A, Rosenstock J, Fonseca V. A model-based meta-analysis of 24 antihyperglycemic drugs for type 2 diabetes: comparison of treatment effects at therapeutic doses. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019; 105:1213–23.
Article
27. Kahn SE, Haffner SM, Heise MA, Herman WH, Holman RR, Jones NP, et al. Glycemic durability of rosiglitazone, metformin, or glyburide monotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355:2427–43.
Article
28. Maedler K, Carr RD, Bosco D, Zuellig RA, Berney T, Donath MY. Sulfonylurea induced beta-cell apoptosis in cultured human islets. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005; 90:501–6.
Full Text Links
  • JKD
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr