Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg.  2021;43(1):5. 10.1186/s40902-021-00290-x.

Comparative study of bone regeneration using fibrin sealant with xenograft in rabbit sinus: pilot study

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Oral and maxillofacial surgery, School of dentistry, Pusan National University, Yangsan 50612, Republic of Korea.
  • 2Department of Oral and maxillofacial surgery, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan 49241, Republic of Korea.
  • 3Dental and Life Science Institute & Dental Research Institute, Pusan National University Dental Hospital, Yangsan 50612, Republic of Korea.
  • 4Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan 49241, Republic of Korea.

Abstract

Background
Stability of the grafted bone volume is one of the important factors to the success of alveolar bone grafts. For this, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) or fibrin sealant is mixed with the bone graft material. Bio-Oss® is a protein-free bovine mineral commonly used in bone graft procedures. The grafting particles are commonly combined with a standard fibrin sealant (Tisseel® ) to fabricate a plastic implantable product. The purpose of this experiment was to evaluate the efficacy of fibrin sealant (Tisseel® ) in bone regeneration performance in a rabbit maxillary sinus model.
Methods
A total of five 3.5 kg weight New Zealand white rabbits were used for the study. After elevating the sinus membrane in both maxillary sinus cavities, Bio-Oss® mixed with normal saline (group 1) was filled into the right side, and Tisseel® mixed Bio-Oss® (group 2) was inserted into the other side. The bone mineral density and bone volume were analyzed with microscopic computed tomography (micro-CT) and histomorphometric 12 weeks after application.
Results
Histologically, new bone formation rate was 14.8%, and grafted bone rate was 70.5% in group 1. In group 2, they were 18.5% and 60.4%, respectively. According to micro-CT analysis, bone mineral density (mg/cm3 , BMD) was 2.5% larger in group 1.
Conclusions
The findings from this study suggest that, although the difference in the bone formation between group 1 and group 2 appears to be insignificant, group 2 had an advantage in using smaller amount of bone substances to achieve the reliable bone formation.

Keyword

Animal models; Xenograft; Bone graft; Maxillary sinus; Fibrin sealant
Full Text Links
  • MPRS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr