Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg.  2021;43(1):16. 10.1186/s40902-021-00301-x.

Appropriate follow-up period for odontogenic keratocyst: a retrospective study

• Jung HD
• Lim JH
• Kim HJ
• Nam W
• Cha IH

• KMID: 2525704
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-021-00301-x

Abstract

Purpose
The aim of this study was to conduct epidemiologic investigations on the pattern of the lesion and differences between treatment modalities in terms of recurrence by reviewing follow-up records to form a basis for planning patient follow-up visits.
Materials and methods
In this retrospective, single-center cohort study, 266 patients diagnosed with odontogenic keratocyst between 1993 and 2013 were included. Medical records and radiographic images were analyzed for age distribution, occurrence site and size, treatment modalities, and recurrence.
Results
The average age at first diagnosis was 33.1 years, and the male to female ratio was 1.33:1.00. The highest rate of incidence was in the third decade followed by the fourth, second, and fifth decades. The incidence in the maxilla was 34%, and 66% in the mandible. Mandibular ramus was most commonly involved. Lesions between 3 and 6 crowns were the most common, and the rate of recurrence increased with size. Enucleation after decompression had higher rate of recurrence (35.8%) than enucleation (27.1%), but there was no statistical significance.
Conclusion
The recurrence of odontogenic kerotocyst (OKC) was significantly associated with large size, multilocular form, and surgical procedure. A 10-year follow-up period is recommended to determine any recurrence of OKC.

Keyword

Odontogenic kerotocyst; OKC; Keratocystic odontogenic tumor; KCOT; Recurrence; Recurrence of OKC