Obstet Gynecol Sci.  2021 Sep;64(5):470-472. 10.5468/ogs.21103.

Laterally extended parametrectomy

Affiliations
  • 1First Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic, G. E. Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology, Târgu Mureș, Romania
  • 2Department of Gynecology, Duna Medical Center, Budapest, Hungary
  • 3Department of Gynecology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
  • 4Department of Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology, County Hospital, Brașov, Romania

Abstract


Objective
To describe the laterally extended parametrectomy (LEP) surgical technique, emphasizing the main challenges of the procedure.
Methods
LEP was designed as a more radical surgical procedure aiming to remove the entire parametrial tissue from the pelvic sidewall. Its initial indications were for lymph node positive Stage Ib (current International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2018 Stage IIIc) and Stage IIb cervical cancer. Currently, with most guidelines recommending definitive radiochemotherapy for these cases, initial LEP indications have become debatable. LEP is now mainly indicated for removing tumors involving the soft structures of the pelvic sidewall during a pelvic exenteration, aiming to obtain lateral free margins. This expands the lateral borders of the dissection to not only the medial surface of internal iliac vessels, but also to the true limits of the pelvic sidewall.
Results
During LEP, the parietal and visceral branches of the hypogastric vessels are divided at the entry and exit level of the pelvis. Consequently, the entire internal iliac system is excised, and no connective or lymphatic tissue remain on the pelvic sidewall. The main technical challenges of LEP are caused by the difficulty in ligating large caliber vessels (internal iliac artery and vein) and the variable anatomic distribution of pelvic sidewall veins.
Conclusion
LEP is a feasible technique for removing pelvic sidewall recurrences, aiming to obtain surgical free margins.

Keyword

Parametrectomy; Cervical cancer; Recurrences; Excision margins

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Left pelvic side wall after laterally extended parametrectomy in another patient.


Reference

References

1. Ungár L, Pálfalvi L. Surgical treatment of lymph node metastases in stage IB cervical cancer: the laterally extended parametrectomy (LEP) procedure. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2003; 13:647–51.
Article
2. Pálfalvi L, Ungár L. Laterally extended parametrectomy (LEP), the technique for radical pelvic side wall dissection: Feasibility, technique and results. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2003; 13:914–7.
Article
3. Cibula D, Dostalek L, Hillemanns P, Scambia G, Jarkovsky J, Persson J, et al. Completion of radical hysterectomy does not improve survival of patients with cervical cancer and intraoperatively detected lymph node involvement: ABRAX international retrospective cohort study. Eur J Cancer. 2021; 143:88–100.
Article
4. Stanca M, Căpîlna ME. Prognostic factors associated with 5-year overall survival in cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy followed by adjuvant concurrent chemoradiation therapy at a tertiary care center in Eastern Europe. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021; 11:570.
Article
5. Căpîlna ME, Moldovan B, Szabo B. Pelvic exenteration-our initial experience in 15 cases. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2015; 36:142–5.
6. Căpîlna ME, Szabo B, Rusu SC, Becsi J, Moldovan B, Neagoe RM, et al. Anatomical variations of the obturator veins and their surgical implications. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2017; 38:263–5.
Full Text Links
  • OGS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr