Cancer Res Treat.  2021 Jul;53(3):763-772. 10.4143/crt.2020.1270.

Development and Validation of a Symptom-Focused Quality of Life Questionnaire (KOQUSS-40) for Gastric Cancer Patients after Gastrectomy

Affiliations
  • 1Center for Gastric Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
  • 2Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 3Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 4Department of Surgery, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Daegu, Korea
  • 5Department of Surgery, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
  • 6Department of Surgery, Yonsei University Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea
  • 7Department Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University of College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 8Department of Surgery, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Korea
  • 9Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea
  • 10Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 11Department of Surgery, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Korea
  • 12Department of Surgery, Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital, Busan, Korea
  • 13Department of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, Cheonan, Korea
  • 14Department of Surgery, National Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
  • 15Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Changwon, Korea
  • 16Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
  • 17Department of Surgery, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hwaseong, Korea
  • 18Department of Surgery, Dankook University Hospital, Cheonan, Korea
  • 19Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
  • 20Department of Surgery, Seoul Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
  • 21Department of Surgery, Dongnam Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Busan, Korea
  • 22Department of Surgery, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
  • 23Department of Psychology, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea
  • 24Department of Surgery, Ajou University Hospital, Suwon, Korea

Abstract

Purpose
Patients who have undergone gastrectomy have unique symptoms that are not appropriately assessed using currently available tools. This study developed and validated a symptom-focused quality of life (QoL) questionnaire for patients who have received gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Materials and Methods Based on a literature review, patient interviews, and expert consultation by the KOrean QUality of life in Stomach cancer patients Study group (KOQUSS), the initial item pool was developed. Two large-scale developmental studies were then sequentially conducted for exploratory factor analyses for content validity and item reduction. The final item pool was validated in a separate cohort of patients and assessed for internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct validity, and clinical validity.
Results
The initial questionnaire consisted of 46-items in 12 domains. Data from 465 patients at 11 institutions, followed by 499 patients at 13 institutions, were used to conduct item reduction and exploratory factor analyses. The final questionnaire (KOQUSS-40) comprised 40 items within 11 domains. Validation of KOQUSS-40 was conducted on 413 patients from 12 hospitals. KOQUSS-40 was found to have good model fit. The mean summary score of the KOQUSS-40 was correlated with the EORTC QLQ-C30 and STO22 (correlation coefficients, 0.821 and 0.778, respectively). The KOQUSS-40 score was also correlated with clinical factors, and had acceptable internal consistency (> 0.7). Test-retest reliability was greater than 0.8. Conclusion The KOQUSS-40 can be used to assess QoL of gastric cancer patients after gastrectomy and allows for a robust comparison of surgical techniques in clinical trials.

Keyword

Stomach neoplasms; Quality of life; Surveys and questionnaires; Validation study

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Study flowchart.


Reference

References

1. Information Committee of Korean Gastric Cancer Association. Korean Gastric Cancer Association Nationwide Survey on Gastric Cancer in 2014. J Gastric Cancer. 2016; 16:131–40.
2. Samm N, Han WH, Yoon HM, Ryu KW, Cho H, Lee S, et al. Prognostic implications of the eighth edition of the union for international cancer control - classification for gastric cancer patients from specialized treatment centers in Germany and Korea: a STOBE-Compliant large-scale cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020; 99:e18922.
3. Sprangers MA, Cull A, Bjordal K, Groenvold M, Aaronson NK. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Approach to quality of life assessment: guidelines for developing questionnaire modules. EORTC Study Group on Quality of Life. Qual Life Res. 1993; 2:287–95.
4. Eremenco SL, Cashy J, Webster K, Ohashi Y, Locker GY, Pelletier G, et al. FACT-Gastric: a new international measure of QOL in gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22(14 Suppl):8123.
Article
5. Kim YW, Baik YH, Yun YH, Nam BH, Kim DH, Choi IJ, et al. Improved quality of life outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: results of a prospective randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2008; 248:721–7.
6. Park JY, Kim YW, Ryu KW, Nam BH, Lee YJ, Jeong SH, et al. Assessment of laparoscopic stomach preserving surgery with sentinel basin dissection versus standard gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy in early gastric cancer: a multicenter randomized phase III clinical trial (SENORITA trial) protocol. BMC Cancer. 2016; 16:340.
Article
7. Kim SM, Cho J, Kang D, Oh SJ, Kim AR, Sohn TS, et al. A randomized controlled trial of vagus nerve-preserving distal gastrectomy versus conventional distal gastrectomy for postoperative quality of life in early stage gastric cancer patients. Ann Surg. 2016; 263:1079–84.
Article
8. Lee JH, Lee HJ, Choi YS, Kim TH, Huh YJ, Suh YS, et al. Postoperative quality of life after total gastrectomy compared with partial gastrectomy: longitudinal evaluation by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-OG25 and STO22. J Gastric Cancer. 2016; 16:230–9.
Article
9. Nakada K, Ikeda M, Takahashi M, Kinami S, Yoshida M, Uenosono Y, et al. Characteristics and clinical relevance of postgastrectomy syndrome assessment scale (PGSAS)-45: newly developed integrated questionnaires for assessment of living status and quality of life in postgastrectomy patients. Gastric Cancer. 2015; 18:147–58.
Article
10. Brierley JD, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C. TNM classification of malignant tumours. 8th ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell;2017.
11. Guideline Committee of the Korean Gastric Cancer Association (KGCA), Development Working Group & Review Panel. Korean practice guideline for gastric cancer 2018: an evidence-based, multi-disciplinary approach. J Gastric Cancer. 2019; 19:1–48.
12. Japanese Gastric Cancer Associaion. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4). Gastric Cancer. 2017; 20:1–19.
13. Ajani JA, Bentrem DJ, Besh S, D’Amico TA, Das P, Denlinger C, et al. Gastric cancer, version 2.2013: featured updates to the NCCN guidelines. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2013; 11:531–46.
14. Hopkins WG. Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sports Med. 2000; 30:1–15.
Article
15. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 3rd ed. Oxford;Oxford University Press;2003.
16. EORTC Data Center. EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring manual [Inter-net]. Brussels: EORTC;c2001. [cited 2020 Dec 28]. Available from: https://www.eortc.org/app/uploads/sites/2/2018/02/SCmanual.pdf .
17. Giesinger JM, Kieffer JM, Fayers PM, Groenvold M, Petersen MA, Scott NW, et al. Replication and validation of higher order models demonstrated that a summary score for the EORTC QLQ-C30 is robust. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016; 69:79–88.
Article
18. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications;1995.
19. Yun YH, Park YS, Lee ES, Bang SM, Heo DS, Park SY, et al. Validation of the Korean version of the EORTC QLQ-C30. Qual Life Res. 2004; 13:863–8.
Article
20. Bae JM, Kim S, Kim YW, Ryu KW, Lee JH, Noh JH, et al. Health-related quality of life among disease-free stomach cancer survivors in Korea. Qual Life Res. 2006; 15:1587–96.
Article
21. Pompili C, Koller M, Velikova G, Franks K, Absolom K, Callister M, et al. EORTC QLQ-C30 summary score reliably detects changes in QoL three months after anatomic lung resection for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Lung Cancer. 2018; 123:149–54.
Article
22. Takahashi M, Terashima M, Kawahira H, Nagai E, Uenosono Y, Kinami S, et al. Quality of life after total vs distal gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction: use of the Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale-45. World J Gastroenterol. 2017; 23:2068–76.
Article
23. Fujita J, Takahashi M, Urushihara T, Tanabe K, Kodera Y, Yumiba T, et al. Assessment of postoperative quality of life following pylorus-preserving gastrectomy and Billroth-I distal gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients: results of the nationwide postgastrectomy syndrome assessment study. Gastric Cancer. 2016; 19:302–11.
Article
24. Nishigori T, Okabe H, Tsunoda S, Shinohara H, Obama K, Hosogi H, et al. Superiority of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with hand-sewn esophagogastrostomy over total gastrectomy in improving postoperative body weight loss and quality of life. Surg Endosc. 2017; 31:3664–72.
Article
25. Lee SS, Ryu SW, Kim IH, Sohn SS. Quality of life beyond the early postoperative period after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy: the level of patient expectation as the essence of quality of life. Gastric Cancer. 2012; 15:299–304.
Article
26. Woo J, Lee JH, Shim KN, Jung HK, Lee HM, Lee HK. Does the difference of invasiveness between totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy and laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy lead to a difference in early surgical outcomes? A prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015; 22:1836–43.
Article
27. Hinz A, Einenkel J, Briest S, Stolzenburg JU, Papsdorf K, Singer S. Is it useful to calculate sum scores of the quality of life questionnaire EORTC QLQ-C30? Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2012; 21:677–83.
Article
Full Text Links
  • CRT
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr