Obstet Gynecol Sci.  2021 May;64(3):329-331. 10.5468/ogs.20311.

A stepwise approach to robotic assisted excision of a cesarean scar pregnancy

• Kashi PK
• Dengler KL
• Welch EK
• DiCarlo-Meacham A
• Jackson AA
• Rose GS

• KMID: 2515987
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.20311

Abstract

Objective
To develop a stepwise approach to robotic assisted excision of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) with metroplasty.
Methods
This illustrative video presentation demonstrating CSP, the criteria for ultrasound diagnosis, and a step-by-step approach for robotic assisted excision of CSP and multi-layer hysterotomy closure at a tertiary medical center.
Results
Robotic assisted resection is a safe and feasible method to treat cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies. Key ultrasonographic characteristics of CSP are highlighted to facilitate its diagnosis, thus allowing for early intervention with a minimally invasive surgical treatment as necessary. Our patient was a 30-year-old gravida 2 para 1 woman with a history of 1 prior-term low transverse cesarean delivery, who presented with vaginal bleeding in the first trimester and was ultimately diagnosed with CSP. After unsuccessful methotrexate therapy, the patient underwent an uncomplicated robotic assisted excision of her CSP and metroplasty in 2 layers using a stepwise approach: Step 1-Creation of a bladder flap; Step 2-Isolation and excision of CSP; Step 3-Hysterotomy closure in 2 layers; and Step 4-Hysteroscopy.
Conclusion
When diagnosed late, cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy can cause a significant hemorrhage from rupture. Early radiologic diagnosis does not only indicate minimally invasive surgery as a treatment option but also assists with related surgical planning. This video demonstrates a stepwise approach to the robotic assisted excision of CSP with metroplasty. With these 4 simple steps, surgical procedure can be safe and efficient.

Keyword

Robotics; Scar pregnancy; Ectopic pregnancy; Hysterotomy

Reference

References

1. Seow KM, Huang LW, Lin YH, Lin MY, Tsai YL, Hwang JL. Cesarean scar pregnancy: issues in management. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 23:247–53.

2. Pędraszewski P, Wlaźlak E, Panek W, Surkont G. Cesarean scar pregnancy-a new challenge for obstetricians. J Ultrason. 2018; 18:56–62.

3. Sinha P, Mishra M. Caesarean scar pregnancy: a precursor of placenta percreta/accreta. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012; 32:621–3.

4. Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Cali G, El Refaey H, Kaelin Agten A, Arslan AA. Easy sonographic differential diagnosis between intrauterine pregnancy and cesarean delivery scar pregnancy in the early first trimester. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 215:225.e1–7.

5. Pirtea L, Balint O, Secosan C, Grigora D, llina R. Laparoscopic resection of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy after unsuccessful systemic methotrexate treatment. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019; 26:399–400.

6. Schmitt A, Crochet P, Agostini A. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic treatment of residual ectopic pregnancy in a previous cesarean section scar: a case report. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017; 24:342–3.

7. Persson J, Gunnarson G, Lindahl B. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery of a 12-week scar pregnancy with temporary occlusion of the uterine blood supply. J Robotic Surg. 2009; 3:53–5.

8. Tulandi T, Cohen A. Emerging manifestations of cesarean scar defect in reproductive women. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016; 23:893–902.

9. Leone FPG, Ragusa G, Lanzani C, Digrandi M, Ferrazzi E. Cervical cerclage after hysteroscopic metroplasty. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 18:88.

10. Huang D, Zhang L, Chen J, Zhang S. The cervical function and pregnancy outcomes after hysteroscopic resection of the complete uterine septum, duplicate cervix and vaginal septum. Laparosc Endosc Rob Surg. 2019; 2:31–3.

11. Kenda Šuster N, Gergolet M. Does hysteroscopic metroplasty for septate uterus represent a risk factor for adverse outcome during pregnancy and labor? Gynecol Surg. 2016; 13:37–41.