Yonsei Med J.  2021 May;62(5):424-430. 10.3349/ymj.2021.62.5.424.

Comparison of the 2017 EULAR/ACR Criteria with Clinicoserologic Criteria for the Classification of Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies in Korean Patients

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
  • 2Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
  • 3Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Konyang University, Daejeon, Korea
  • 4Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheong-ju, Korea
  • 5Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea
  • 6Department of Internal Medicine, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea

Abstract

Purpose
To investigate correlations between myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSA) or myositis-associated antibodies (MAA) and clinical features, thereby demonstrating the utility of clinicoserologic classification in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) patients.
Materials and Methods
We conducted a multicenter study of 108 adult patients (age ≥18 years) who were diagnosed with IIM by Peter and Bohan criteria or 2004 European Neuromuscular Centre (ENMC) criteria. Clinical data were obtained by medical record review. Immunoblot assay with Euroline strip (EUROIMMUN, Germany) was performed using the sera of dermatomyositis (DM, n=56), polymyositis (PM, n=45), amyopathic DM (n=5), DM sine dermatitis (n=1), and immune mediated necrotizing myopathy (n=1) patients. Patients were classified based on two classifications: 2017 EULAR/ACR and novel clinicoserologic classification.
Results
According to 2017 EULAR/ACR criteria, DM and PM were the most and the second most frequent entities. Overlap myositis was the major entity of IIM, and the frequency of PM was significantly lower when applying clinicoserologic classification criteria. Sixty-nine (63.9%) patients had one or more MSA, and 61 (56.5%) patients had one or more MAA. Interstitial lung disease was closely associated with anti-MDA5 and anti-ARS, and DM-specific skin lesions were frequently observed in patients with antiTIF1γ, anti-SRP, and anti-MDA5.
Conclusion
The clinicoserologic criteria based on MSA/MAA positivity could reflect more precise clinical features of IIM. Establishment of a laboratory system routinely available to screen for MSA/MAA status will be beneficial to provide precise diagnosis and proper management of IIM patients.

Keyword

Idiopathic inflammatory myositis; novel classification criteria; overlap myositis; myositis specific autoantibody
Full Text Links
  • YMJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr