Korean J Gastroenterol.  2021 Mar;77(3):104-114. 10.4166/kjg.2021.020.

How to Study the Sex and Gender Effect in Biomedical Research?

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Physiology, Wonkwang Digestive Disease Research Institute, Wonkwang University School of Medicine, Iksan, Korea
  • 2Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 3Integrated Major in Innovative Medical Science, Seoul National University Graduate School, Seoul, Korea
  • 4Sanbon Good Breath Clinic, Gunpo, Korea
  • 5Diversity Committee of the Korean Society of Gastroenterology, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

Men and women are different, but this difference has not been well reflected in clinical trials and preclinical studies of biomedical science. Gender medicine, which systematically analyzes research results according to sex and gender, has been emphasized to overcome this problem. On the other hand, researchers still have difficulty in applying gender medicine to their research. To perform rigorous gender medicine, using correct terms, a thorough literature review during research planning, appropriate statistical analysis and reporting, and cautious interpretation of the results are necessary. Applying gender medicine will increase the reproducibility of studies, promote discoveries, expand the study relevance, and ultimately improve patient care in both men and women. Here, this study reviewed the practical issues on applying gender medicine to both preclinical and clinical studies in the field of biomedical science.

Keyword

Sex; Gender equity; Translational medical research; Clinical trial

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Cardiovascular disease mortality trends for males and females (United States: 1979-2013). Writing Group Members et al.6. Reprinted with permission. Circulation 2016;133:e38-e360. © 2016 American Heart Association, Inc.

  • Fig. 2 Distribution of the absolute number of hospitalizations with peptic ulcer bleeding and hospitalization rate per 100,000 person-year according to sex and age in Korea. Modified from Kim et al.57. Reprinted with permission Gut Liver, Published online October 21, 2020 © 2021 Gut and Liver.


Cited by  1 articles

Application of sex/gender-specific medicine in healthcare
Nayoung Kim
Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2023;29(1):5-11.    doi: 10.4069/kjwhn.2023.03.13.


Reference

1. Mauvais-Jarvis F, Bairey Merz N, Barnes PJ, et al. 2020; Sex and gender: modifiers of health, disease, and medicine. Lancet. 396:565–582. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31561-0. PMID: 32828189. PMCID: PMC7440877.
Article
2. Baird KL. 1999; The new NIH and FDA medical research policies: targeting gender, promoting justice. J Health Polit Policy Law. 24:531–565. DOI: 10.1215/03616878-24-3-531. PMID: 10386326.
Article
3. Wenger NK. 2004; Yoúve come a long way, baby: cardiovascular health and disease in women: problems and prospects. Circulation. 109:558–560. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000117292.19349.D0. PMID: 14769673.
4. Jahng J, Kim YS. 2017; Why should we contemplate on gender difference in functional gastrointestinal disorders? J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 23:1–2. DOI: 10.5056/jnm16209. PMID: 28049860. PMCID: PMC5216626.
Article
5. Johnson SM, Karvonen CA, Phelps CL, Nader S, Sanborn BM. 2003; Assessment of analysis by gender in the Cochrane reviews as related to treatment of cardiovascular disease. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 12:449–457. DOI: 10.1089/154099903766651577. PMID: 12869292.
Article
6. Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, et al. Writing Group Members. 2016; Heart disease and stroke statistics-2016 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 133:e38–e360. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000350. PMID: 26673558.
7. Consideration of sex as a biological variable in nih-funded research. [Internet]. National Institutes of Health;Bethesda (MD): Available from: https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-15-102.html. cited 2021 Jan 15.
8. Legato MJ, Johnson PA, Manson JE. 2016; Consideration of sex differences in medicine to improve health care and patient outcomes. JAMA. 316:1865–1866. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.13995. PMID: 27802499.
Article
9. Johnson JL, Beaudet A. 2012; Sex and gender reporting in health research: why Canada should be a leader. Can J Public Health. 104:e80–e81. DOI: 10.1007/BF03405660. PMCID: PMC6973991. PMID: 23618110.
Article
10. H2020 programme: guidance on gender equality in Horizon 2020. [Internet]. European Commission;Brussels: Available from: https://eige.europa.eu/sites/default/files/h2020-hi-guide-gender_en.pdf. cited 2021 Jan 13.
11. McNutt M. 2014; Journals unite for reproducibility. Science. 346:679. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaa1724. PMID: 25383411.
Article
12. Heidari S, Babor TF, De Castro P, Tort S, Curno M. 2016; Sex and gender equity in research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use. Res Integr Peer Rev. 1:2. DOI: 10.1186/s41073-016-0007-6. PMID: 29451543. PMCID: PMC5793986.
Article
13. Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG. 2010; Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol. 8:e1000412. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000412. PMID: 20613859. PMCID: PMC2893951.
Article
14. Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. [Internet]. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors;Available from: http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/. Updated 2019 Dec; cited 2021 Jan 15.
15. Regitz-Zagrosek V, Seeland U. 2012; Sex and gender differences in clinical medicine. Handb Exp Pharmacol. (214):3–22. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-30726-3_1. PMID: 23027443.
Article
16. Rich-Edwards JW, Kaiser UB, Chen GL, Manson JE, Goldstein JM. 2018; Sex and gender differences research design for basic, clinical, and population studies: essentials for investigators. Endocr Rev. 39:424–439. DOI: 10.1210/er.2017-00246. PMID: 29668873. PMCID: PMC7263836.
Article
17. Schiebinger L, Leopold SS, Miller VM. 2016; Editorial policies for sex and gender analysis. Lancet. 388:2841–2842. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32392-3. PMID: 27979394.
Article
18. Clayton JA, Tannenbaum C. 2016; Reporting sex, gender, or both in clinical research? JAMA. 316:1863–1864. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.16405. PMID: 27802482.
Article
19. Terms. [Internet]. Gendered Innovations;Stanford (CA): Available from: http://genderedinnovations.stanford.edu/terms.html. cited 2021 Jan 15.
20. Regitz-Zagrosek V. 2012; Sex and gender differences in health. Science & Society Series on Sex and Science. EMBO Rep. 13:596–603. DOI: 10.1038/embor.2012.87. PMID: 22699937. PMCID: PMC3388783.
21. Oertelt-Prigione S, Regitz-Zagrosek V. 2012. Sex and gender aspects in clinical medicine. Springer;London: p. 201. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-85729-832-4.
22. Toner BB, Akman D. 2000; Gender role and irritable bowel syndrome: literature review and hypothesis. Am J Gastroenterol. 95:11–16. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.01698.x. PMID: 10638553.
Article
23. 2018. Jul. 30. Guideline for considering sex and gender variables in biomedical research. [Internet]. Korea Federation Women's Science & Technology Associations;Seoul: Available from: https://kofwst.org/kr/reference/ebook.php?bbs_data=aWR4PTc5MjEmc3RhcnRQYWdlPTEwJmxpc3RObz0yNCZ0YWJsZT1jc19iYnNfZGF0YSZjb2RlPWVib29rJnNlYXJjaF9pdGVtPSZzZWFyY2hfb3JkZXI9||&bgu=view&idx=7921&pageNum=&cate=. cited 2021 Jan 13.
24. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Understanding the Biology of Sex and Gender Differences. 2001. Exploring the biological contributions to human health: does sex matter? National Academies Press;Washington (DC):
25. Wizemann T. 2012. Sex-specific reporting of scientific research: a workshop summary. National Academies Press;Washington (DC):
26. Veilleux A, Tchernof A. Symonds M, editor. 2012. Sex differences in body fat distribution. Adipose tissue biology. Springer Science and Business Media;New York: p. 123–166. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-0965-6_5.
Article
27. Clayton JA, Collins FS. 2014; Policy: NIH to balance sex in cell and animal studies. Nature. 509:282–283. DOI: 10.1038/509282a. PMID: 24834516. PMCID: PMC5101948.
Article
28. Fisher EM, Beer-Romero P, Brown LG, et al. 1990; Homologous ribosomal protein genes on the human X and Y chromosomes: escape from X inactivation and possible implications for Turner syndrome. Cell. 63:1205–1218. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90416-C. PMID: 2124517.
Article
29. Crisostomo PR, Markel TA, Wang M, Lahm T, Lillemoe KD, Meldrum DR. 2007; In the adult mesenchymal stem cell population, source gender is a biologically relevant aspect of protective power. Surgery. 142:215–221. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.04.013. PMID: 17689688.
Article
30. Analyzing sex in tissues and cells. [Internet]. Gendered Innovations;Stanford (CA): vailable from: http://genderedinnovations.stanford.edu/methods/tissues.html. cited 2021 Jan 15.
31. Asselin-Labat ML, Vaillant F, Sheridan JM, et al. 2010; Control of mammary stem cell function by steroid hormone signalling. Nature. 465:798–802. DOI: 10.1038/nature09027. PMID: 20383121.
Article
32. Du L, Bayir H, Lai Y, et al. 2004; Innate gender-based proclivity in response to cytotoxicity and programmed cell death pathway. J Biol Chem. 279:38563–38570. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M405461200. PMID: 15234982.
Article
33. Deasy BM, Lu A, Tebbets JC, et al. 2007; A role for cell sex in stem cell-mediated skeletal muscle regeneration: female cells have higher muscle regeneration efficiency. J Cell Biol. 177:73–86. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.200612094. PMID: 17420291. PMCID: PMC2064113.
Article
34. Zucker I, Beery AK. 2010; Males still dominate animal studies. Nature. 465:690. DOI: 10.1038/465690a. PMID: 20535186.
Article
35. Beery AK. 2018; Inclusion of females does not increase variability in rodent research studies. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 23:143–149. DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.06.016. PMID: 30560152. PMCID: PMC6294461.
Article
36. Wald C, Wu C. 2010; Biomedical research. Of mice and women: the bias in animal models. Science. 327:1571–1572. DOI: 10.1126/science.327.5973.1571. PMID: 20339045.
37. Prendergast BJ, Onishi KG, Zucker I. 2014; Female mice liberated for inclusion in neuroscience and biomedical research. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 40:1–5. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.01.001. PMID: 24456941.
Article
38. Becker JB, Arnold AP, Berkley KJ, et al. 2005; Strategies and methods for research on sex differences in brain and behavior. Endocrinology. 146:1650–1673. DOI: 10.1210/en.2004-1142. PMID: 15618360.
Article
39. Walker VR, Korach KS. 2004; Estrogen receptor knockout mice as a model for endocrine research. ILAR J. 45:455–461. DOI: 10.1093/ilar.45.4.455. PMID: 15454684.
Article
40. Kerkhofs S, Denayer S, Haelens A, Claessens F. 2009; Androgen receptor knockout and knock-in mouse models. J Mol Endocrinol. 42:11–17. DOI: 10.1677/JME-08-0122. PMID: 18923000.
Article
41. Arnold AP, Chen X. 2009; What does the "four core genotypes" mouse model tell us about sex differences in the brain and other tissues? Front Neuroendocrinol. 30:1–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2008.11.001. PMID: 19028515. PMCID: PMC3282561.
Article
42. Principles and guidelines for reporting preclinical research. [Internet]. National Institutes of Health;Bethesda (MD): Available from: https://www.nih.gov/research-training/rigor-reproducibility/principles-guidelines-reporting-preclinical-research. updated 2017 Dec 12;cited 2021 Jan 15.
43. Ridker PM, Cook NR, Lee IM, et al. 2005; A randomized trial of low-dose aspirin in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in women. N Engl J Med. 352:1293–1304. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa050613. PMID: 15753114.
Article
44. Young EA, Kornstein SG, Marcus SM, et al. 2009; Sex differences in response to citalopram: a STAR*D report. J Psychiatr Res. 43:503–511. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2008.07.002. PMID: 18752809. PMCID: PMC2681489.
Article
45. Farkas RH, Unger EF, Temple R. 2013; Zolpidem and driving impairment--identifying persons at risk. N Engl J Med. 369:689–691. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1307972. PMID: 23923991.
46. Day S, Mason R, Tannenbaum C, Rochon PA. 2017; Essential metrics for assessing sex & gender integration in health research proposals involving human participants. PLoS One. 12:e0182812. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182812. PMID: 28854192. PMCID: PMC5576646.
47. Mosca L, Barrett-Connor E, Wenger NK. 2011; Sex/gender differences in cardiovascular disease prevention: what a difference a decade makes. Circulation. 124:2145–2154. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.968792. PMID: 22064958. PMCID: PMC3362050.
48. Holsen LM, Lancaster K, Klibanski A, et al. 2013; HPA-axis hormone modulation of stress response circuitry activity in women with remitted major depression. Neuroscience. 250:733–742. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.07.042. PMID: 23891965. PMCID: PMC3772711.
Article
49. Health & Medicine Checklist. [Internet].  Gendered Innovations;Stanford (CA): Available from: http://genderedinnovations.stanford.edu/methods/health_med_checklist.html. cited 2021 Jan 15.
50. Miller V, Whitaker K, Morris JA, Whorwell PJ. 2004; Gender and irritable bowel syndrome: the male connection. J Clin Gastroenterol. 38:558–560. DOI: 10.1097/00004836-200408000-00004. PMID: 15232357.
51. Arcand M, Juster RP, Lupien SJ, Marin MF. 2020; Gender roles in relation to symptoms of anxiety and depression among students and workers. Anxiety Stress Coping. 33:661–674. DOI: 10.1080/10615806.2020.1774560. PMID: 32490683.
Article
52. Bem SL. 1974; The measurement of psychological androgyny. J Consult Clin Psychol. 42:155–162. DOI: 10.1037/h0036215. PMID: 4823550.
Article
53. Kim JH, Ha MS, Kim BH, Ha JH, Kim HJ. 2016; Validation of short form of Korean Sex Role Inventory (KSRI-SF). Korean J Counseling. 17:125–147. DOI: 10.15703/kjc.17.1.201602.125.
54. Ahmed T, Vafaei A, Belanger E, Phillips SP, Zunzunegui MV. 2016; Bem sex role inventory validation in the international mobility in aging study. Can J Aging. 35:348–360. DOI: 10.1017/S0714980816000404. PMID: 27477107.
Article
55. Wallach JD, Sullivan PG, Trepanowski JF, Steyerberg EW, Ioannidis JP. 2016; Sex based subgroup differences in randomized controlled trials: empirical evidence from Cochrane meta-analyses. BMJ. 355:i5826. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i5826. PMID: 27884869. PMCID: PMC5122320.
Article
56. Sipponen P, Correa P. 2002; Delayed rise in incidence of gastric cancer in females results in unique sex ratio (M/F) pattern: etiologic hypothesis. Gastric Cancer. 5:213–219. DOI: 10.1007/s101200200037. PMID: 12491079.
Article
57. Kim YS, Lee J, Shin A, Lee JM, Park JH, Jung HY. 2020; Oct. 21. A nationwide cohort study shows a sex-dependent change in the trend of peptic ulcer bleeding incidence in Korea between 2006 and 2015. Gut Liver. DOI: 10.5009/gnl20079. PMID: 33071238. [Epub ahead of print].
Article
58. Ryu KY. 2014. Applied logistic regression. Hanarae Academy;Seoul:
59. Aulakh AK, Anand SS. 2007; Sex and gender subgroup analyses of randomized trials. Womens Health Issues. 17:342–350. DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2007.04.002. PMID: 17936640.
Article
60. Miller VM, Rice M, Schiebinger L, et al. 2013; Embedding concepts of sex and gender health differences into medical curricula. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 22:194–202. DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2012.4193. PMID: 23414074. PMCID: PMC3601631.
Article
61. Linder A, Svedberg W. 2019; Review of average sized male and female occupant models in European regulatory safety assessment tests and European laws: Gaps and bridging suggestions. Accid Anal Prev. 127:156–162. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.02.030. PMID: 30884388.
Article
62. Pelletier R, Khan NA, Cox J, et al. 2016; Sex versus gender-related characteristics: which predicts outcome after acute coronary syndrome in the young? J Am Coll Cardiol. 67:127–135. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.067. PMID: 26791057.
63. 2001. Jan. 19. Drug safety: most drugs withdrawn in recent years had greater health risks for women. [Internet]. Government Accountability Office;Washington (DC): Available from: https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-01-286r. cited 2021 Jan 15.
64. Barbey JT, Lazzara R, Zipes DP. 2002; Spontaneous adverse event reports of serious ventricular arrhythmias, QT prolongation, syncope, and sudden death in patients treated with cisapride. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 7:65–76. DOI: 10.1177/107424840200700202. PMID: 12075394.
Article
65. Mearin F, Rodrigo L, Pérez-Mota A, et al. 2004; Levosulpiride and cisapride in the treatment of dysmotility-like functional dyspepsia: a randomized, double-masked trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2:301–308. DOI: 10.1016/S1542-3565(04)00059-X. PMID: 15067624.
Article
66. Walker AM, Szneke P, Weatherby LB, et al. 1999; The risk of serious cardiac arrhythmias among cisapride users in the United Kingdom and Canada. Am J Med. 107:356–362. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9343(99)00241-7. PMID: 10527038.
67. Beery AK, Zucker I. 2011; Sex bias in neuroscience and biomedical research. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 35:565–572. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.07.002. PMID: 20620164. PMCID: PMC3008499.
Article
68. Mauvais-Jarvis F, Arnold AP, Reue K. 2017; A Guide for the design of pre-clinical studies on sex differences in metabolism. Cell Metab. 25:1216–1230. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.04.033. PMID: 28591630. PMCID: PMC5516948.
Article
69. Buoncervello M, Marconi M, Carè A, Piscopo P, Malorni W, Matarrese P. 2017; Preclinical models in the study of sex differences. Clin Sci (Lond). 131:449–469. DOI: 10.1042/CS20160847. PMID: 28265036.
Article
70. McGregor AJ, Hasnain M, Sandberg K, Morrison MF, Berlin M, Trott J. 2016; How to study the impact of sex and gender in medical research: a review of resources. Biol Sex Differ. 7(Suppl 1):46. DOI: 10.1186/s13293-016-0099-1. PMID: 27785348. PMCID: PMC5073798.
Article
71. Franconi F, Campesi I, Colombo D, Antonini P. 2019; Sex-gender variable: methodological recommendations for increasing scientific value of clinical studies. Cells. 8:476. DOI: 10.3390/cells8050476. PMID: 31109006. PMCID: PMC6562815.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KJG
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr