Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg.  2021 Feb;25(1):84-89. 10.14701/ahbps.2021.25.1.84.

A comparative study of postoperative outcomes after stapled versus handsewn gastrojejunal anastomosis for pylorus-resecting pancreaticoduodenectomy

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Hospital and Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
  • 2Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital and Medical School, Hwasun, Korea

Abstract

Backgrounds/Aims
A stapler is widely used in various surgeries, and there have been recent attempts to use it for performing duodenojejunostomy and gastrojejunostomy during pancreaticoduodenectomy. This study aimed to compare the postoperative results of handsewn gastrojejunostomy (HGJ) and stapled gastrojejunstomy (SGJ) limited to pylorus-resecting pancreaticoduodenectomy (PrPD) performed by a single surgeon.
Methods
This retrospective study was conducted between January 2014 and March 2020, and included 131 patients who underwent PrPD performed by a single surgeon. Of the total subjects, 90 were in the HGJ group and 41 in the SGJ group.
Results
The mean time of surgery was significantly shorter in the stapled group than in the handsewn group (450.4±75.4 min vs. 397.1±66.5 min, p<0.001). However, there were no significant differences between the groups in the rates of postoperative pancreatic fistula, bile leak, chyle leak, intra-abdominal fluid collection, postoperative bleeding, ileus, Clavien-Dindo, rate of reoperation, and 30-day mortality, including delayed gastric emptying (DGE) (n=11 vs. n=6, p=0.92).
Conclusions
Gastrojejunostomy using a stapler in PrPD reduces the reconstruction time without any increase in the rate of complications, including DGE. Therefore, using a stapler for gastrojejunostomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy is feasible and safe.

Keyword

PrPD; DGE; Stapler; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Single surgeon

Reference

1. Winter JM, Cameron JL, Yeo CJ, Lillemoe KD, Campbell KA, Schulick RD. 2008; Duodenojejunostomy leaks after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 12:263–269. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-007-0370-1. PMID: 17968631.
Article
2. Traverso LW, Hashimoto Y. 2008; Delayed gastric emptying: the state of the highest level of evidence. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 15:262–269. DOI: 10.1007/s00534-007-1304-8. PMID: 18535763.
Article
3. Lai EC, Lau SH, Lau WY. 2009; Measures to prevent pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy: a comprehensive review. Arch Surg. 144:1074–1080. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.193. PMID: 19917946.
4. Mitchell CK, Smoger SH, Pfeifer MP, Vogel RL, Pandit MK, Donnelly PJ, et al. 1998; Multivariate analysis of factors associated with postoperative pulmonary complications following general elective surgery. Arch Surg. 133:194–198. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.133.2.194. PMID: 9484734.
Article
5. Reich DL, Bennett-Guerrero E, Bodian CA, Hossain S, Winfree W, Krol M. 2002; Intraoperative tachycardia and hypertension are independently associated with adverse outcome in noncardiac surgery of long duration. Anesth Analg. 95:273–277. table of contents. DOI: 10.1213/00000539-200208000-00003. PMID: 12145033.
Article
6. Nomura S, Sasako M, Katai H, Sano T, Maruyama K. 2000; Decreasing complication rates with stapled esophagojejunostomy following a learning curve. Gastric Cancer. 3:97–101. DOI: 10.1007/PL00011703. PMID: 11984718.
Article
7. Hyodo M, Hosoya Y, Hirashima Y, Haruta H, Kurashina K, Saito S, et al. 2007; Minimum leakage rate (0.5%) of stapled esophagojejunostomy with sacrifice of a small part of the jejunum after total gastrectomy in 390 consecutive patients. Dig Surg. 24:169–172. DOI: 10.1159/000102100. PMID: 17476107.
Article
8. Korolija D. 2008; The current evidence on stapled versus hand-sewn anastomoses in the digestive tract. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 17:151–154. DOI: 10.1080/13645700802103423. PMID: 18609000.
Article
9. Liu BW, Liu Y, Liu JR, Feng ZX. 2014; Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled anastomoses in surgeries of gastrointestinal tumors based on clinical practice of China. World J Surg Oncol. 12:292. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7819-12-292. PMID: 25240386. PMCID: PMC4194420.
Article
10. Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S, Khan RMA, Malik S, Mansour M, Kausar A, et al. 2017; Stapled anastomosis versus hand-sewn anastomosis of gastro/duodenojejunostomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 48:1–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.09.071. PMID: 28987557.
Article
11. Sakamoto Y, Hori S, Oguro S, Arita J, Kishi Y, Nara S, et al. 2016; Delayed gastric emptying after stapled versus hand-sewn anastomosis of duodenojejunostomy in pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy: a randomized controlled trial. J Gastrointest Surg. 20:595–603. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-015-2961-6. PMID: 26403716.
Article
12. Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, et al. 2007; Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. 142:761–768. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.05.005. PMID: 17981197.
Article
13. Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M, Abu Hilal M, Adham M, et al. 2017; The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery. 161:584–591. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.014. PMID: 28040257.
14. Murata Y, Tanemura A, Kato H, Kuriyama N, Azumi Y, Kishiwada M, et al. 2017; Superiority of stapled side-to-side gastrojejunostomy over conventional hand-sewn end-to-side gastrojejunostomy for reducing the risk of primary delayed gastric emptying after subtotal stomach-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg Today. 47:1007–1017. DOI: 10.1007/s00595-017-1504-z. PMID: 28337543. PMCID: PMC5493708.
Article
15. Sakamoto Y, Yamamoto Y, Hata S, Nara S, Esaki M, Sano T, et al. 2011; Analysis of risk factors for delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after 387 pancreaticoduodenectomies with usage of 70 stapled reconstructions. J Gastrointest Surg. 15:1789–1797. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-011-1498-6. PMID: 21826550.
Article
16. Kawai M, Tani M, Hirono S, Miyazawa M, Shimizu A, Uchiyama K, et al. 2011; Pylorus ring resection reduces delayed gastric emptying in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial of pylorus-resecting versus pylorus- preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 253:495–501. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31820d98f1. PMID: 21248633.
17. Sato N, Yabuki K, Kohi S, Mori Y, Minagawa N, Tamura T, et al. 2013; Stapled gastro/duodenojejunostomy shortens reconstruction time during pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol. 19:9399–9404. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i48.9399. PMID: 24409068. PMCID: PMC3882414.
Article
18. Kim DH, Hong SC, Jang JY, Cho JK, Ju YT, Lee YJ, et al. 2019; Comparing the surgical outcomes of stapled anastomosis versus hand-sewn anastomosis of duodenojejunostomy in pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 23:245–251. DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.2019.23.3.245. PMID: 31501813. PMCID: PMC6728254.
Article
19. Huang W, Xiong JJ, Wan MH, Szatmary P, Bharucha S, Gomatos I, et al. 2015; Meta-analysis of subtotal stomach-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy vs pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol. 21:6361–6373. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i20.6361. PMID: 26034372. PMCID: PMC4445114.
20. Zhou Y, Lin L, Wu L, Xu D, Li B. 2015; A case-matched comparison and meta-analysis comparing pylorus-resecting pancreaticoduodenectomy with pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy for the incidence of postoperative delayed gastric emptying. HPB (Oxford). 17:337–343. DOI: 10.1111/hpb.12358. PMID: 25388024. PMCID: PMC4368398.
Article
21. Hanna MM, Gadde R, Allen CJ, Meizoso JP, Sleeman D, Livingstone AS, et al. 2016; Delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Surg Res. 202:380–388. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.12.053. PMID: 27229113.
Article
22. Kim DK, Hindenburg AA, Sharma SK, Suk CH, Gress FG, Staszewski H, et al. 2005; Is pylorospasm a cause of delayed gastric emptying after pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy? Ann Surg Oncol. 12:222–227. DOI: 10.1245/ASO.2005.03.078. PMID: 15827814.
Article
Full Text Links
  • AHBPS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr