Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol.  2021 Feb;14(1):100-107. 10.21053/ceo.2019.01704.

Evaluation of the Esthetic and Functional Outcomes of Extracorporeal Septoplasty for Rhinoplasty in Asian Patients

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea
  • 2Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, Korea

Abstract


Objectives
. In extracorporeal septoplasty (ECS), the entire septal cartilage is harvested, and a neo-L strut is built extracorporeally. Thus, ECS can simultaneously achieve septum straightening and tip projection. This study evaluated the functional and esthetic outcomes of the ECS technique for rhinoplasty in Asian patients.
Methods
. We conducted a retrospective review of 64 patients who underwent rhinoplasty using ECS between January 2016 and March 2018. Subjective patient satisfaction was assessed and objective surgical outcomes were evaluated. Improvement in nasal obstruction was rated using a visual analog scale (VAS). Anthropometric changes were compared between preoperative and postoperative facial photographs. Complications and revisions were also analyzed.
Results
. The participants comprised 64 patients (48 males and 16 females, with a mean age of 29.3 years). The mean operative time was 89.3 minutes. In total, 61 patients were satisfied with the esthetic outcome, and the overall objective rhinoplasty outcome score was 3.45. Preoperative nasal obstruction symptoms (7.9±1.2 on VAS) improved postoperatively (3.1±1.3, P<0.001), and significant improvements were also observed in the nasofrontal angle (152.3° to 148.1°, P<0.001), nasolabial angle (88.8° to 92.0°, P<0.001), and nasal tip projection (0.62 to 0.66, P<0.033). Recurrent deviation of the nasal septum and external nose or tip deprojection did not occur in any patients, and there were no cases of revision during the mean follow-up period of 13.3 months.
Conclusion
. ECS might be an esthetically and functionally satisfactory alternative rhinoplasty technique for Asian patients with a shortage of septal cartilage.

Keyword

Extracorporeal Septoplasty; Rhinoplasty; Asian; Septal Extension Graft

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Schematic drawing of the surgical procedure of rhinoplasty using the extracorporeal septoplasty technique. (A) Preoperative photograph of a patient illustrating tip drooping and a pseudohump. (B) Harvestable septal cartilage in situ. (C) Septal cartilage harvest with the exception of a few millimeters of the dorsal stump to avoid injury to the keystone area. (D) Extracorporeal design of the neo-L strut and spreader graft on the harvested septum. (E) Neo-L strut construction with an optimum tip projection and dorsal profile. (F) Additional spreader grafts for further stabilization of the dorsal support, if needed. (G) Additional onlay graft as necessary to improve tip definition. (H) Postoperative photograph of the patient with an improved dorsolateral profile.

  • Fig. 2. Representative case. Preoperative (A-C) and 6-month postoperative (D-F) views of a 19-year-old woman with a deviated nose and underprojected tip treated with extracorporeal septoplasty for rhinoplasty (extracorporeal septoplasty technique with bilateral spreader grafts, two tip onlay grafts, and a dorsal onlay graft with crushed septal cartilage).

  • Fig. 3. Representative case. Preoperative (A-C) and 5-month postoperative (D-F) views of a 23-year-old man with an underprojected and derotated nasal tip treated with extracorporeal septoplasty for rhinoplasty (extracorporeal septoplasty technique with a unilateral spreader graft and a tip onlay graft).

  • Fig. 4. Anthropometric measurements. (A) Nasofrontal angle: angle of the nasal tip, radix, and forward-most projecting point of the forehead. (B) Nasolabial angle: angle between the line from the anterior columella to the subnasale and the line from the subnasale to the labrale superius. (C) Tip projection index: the length of the line drawn from the nasal tip to the alar crease divided by the length of the nasion-to-nasal tip line. (D) Deviation angle: angle between the vertical line between the midpoint of the glabella and the midpoint of the upper lip and another line representing the nasal dorsal axis.

  • Fig. 5. Preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores for nasal obstruction. The VAS scores for nasal obstruction significantly decreased from 7.9 to 3.1 (P<0.001).

  • Fig. 6. Objective esthetic surgical outcomes using the objective rhinoplasty outcome score. The objective rhinoplasty outcome scores were >3 for all components, and the overall result was 3.45.


Cited by  1 articles

Can We Kill Two Birds With One Stone? Achieving Function and Aesthetics by Extracorporeal Septoplasty
Yong Ju Jang
Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2021;14(1):9-10.    doi: 10.21053/ceo.2020.02481.


Reference

1. Jang YJ, Alfanta EM. Rhinoplasty in the Asian nose. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2014; Aug. 22(3):357–77.
Article
2. Jang YJ. Dorsal augmentation using costal cartilage: what is the best way? Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2019; Nov. 12(4):327–8.
Article
3. Matory WE Jr, Falces E. Non-Caucasian rhinoplasty: a 16-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986; Feb. 77(2):239–52.
4. Aung SC, Foo CL, Lee ST. Three dimensional laser scan assessment of the Oriental nose with a new classification of Oriental nasal types. Br J Plast Surg. 2000; 53(2):109–16.
Article
5. Wu WT. The Oriental nose: an anatomical basis for surgery. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1992; Mar. 21(2):176–89.
6. Zingaro EA, Falces E. Aesthetic anatomy of the non-Caucasian nose. Clin Plast Surg. 1987; Oct. 14(4):749–65.
Article
7. Han SK, Lee DG, Kim JB, Kim WK. An anatomic study of nasal tip supporting structures. Ann Plast Surg. 2004; Feb. 52(2):134–9.
Article
8. Choi JY, Kang IG, Javidnia H, Sykes JM. Complications of septal extension grafts in Asian patients. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2014; May-Jun. 16(3):169–75.
Article
9. Jang YJ, Kwon M. Modified extracorporeal septoplasty technique in rhinoplasty for severely deviated noses. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2010; May. 119(5):331–5.
Article
10. Park P, Jin HR. Diced cartilage in fascia for major nasal dorsal augmentation in Asians: a review of 15 consecutive cases. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2016; Dec. 40(6):832–9.
Article
11. Choi JY, Park JH, Javidnia H, Sykes JM. Effect of various facial angles and measurements on the ideal position of the nasal tip in the Asian patient population. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2013; Nov-Dec. 15(6):417–21.
Article
12. Wang JH, Jang YJ, Park SK, Lee BJ. Measurement of aesthetic proportions in the profile view of Koreans. Ann Plast Surg. 2009; Feb. 62(2):109–13.
Article
13. Kim JS, Khan NA, Song HM, Jang YJ. Intraoperative measurements of harvestable septal cartilage in rhinoplasty. Ann Plast Surg. 2010; Dec. 65(6):519–23.
Article
14. Byrd HS, Andochick S, Copit S, Walton KG. Septal extension grafts: a method of controlling tip projection shape. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997; Sep. 100(4):999–1010.
Article
15. Jin HR, Won TB. Nasal tip augmentation in Asians using autogenous cartilage. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009; Apr. 140(4):526–30.
Article
16. Ha RY, Byrd HS. Septal extension grafts revisited: 6-year experience in controlling nasal tip projection and shape. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003; Dec. 112(7):1929–35.
17. Kang JG, Ryu J. Nasal tip surgery using a modified septal extension graft by means of extended marginal incision. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; Jan. 123(1):343–52.
Article
18. Emsen IM. A different approach to the reconstruction of the stubborn crooked nose with a different spreader graft: nasal bone grafts harvested from them removed nasal hump. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2008; Mar. 32(2):266–73.
19. Gunter JP, Rohrich RJ. Lengthening the aesthetically short nose. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989; May. 83(5):793–800.
Article
20. Lin J, Chen X, Wang X, Gao X, Zheng X, Chen X, et al. A modified septal extension graft for the Asian nasal tip. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2013; Sep-Oct. 15(5):362–8.
Article
21. Lee SB, Jang YJ. Treatment outcomes of extracorporeal septoplasty compared with in situ septal correction in rhinoplasty. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2014; 16(5):328–34.
Article
22. Won TB, Kang JG, Jin HR. Management of post-traumatic combined deviated and saddle nose deformity. Acta Otolaryngol. 2012; Jun. 132 Suppl 1:S44–51.
Article
23. Jin HR, Kim DW, Jung HJ. Common sites, etiology, and solutions of persistent septal deviation in revision septoplasty. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2018; Dec. 11(4):288–92.
Article
24. Kantas I, Balatsouras DG, Papadakis CE, Marangos N, Korres SG, Danielides V. Aesthetic reconstruction of a crooked nose via extracorporeal septoplasty. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008; Apr. 37(2):154–9.
Full Text Links
  • CEO
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr