Ann Lab Med.  2021 Jan;41(1):114-119. 10.3343/alm.2021.41.1.114.

Comparison of Three Blood Collection Tubes for 35 Biochemical Analytes: The Becton Dickinson Barricor Tube, Serum Separating Tube, and Plasma Separating Tube

• Shin S
• Oh J
• Park HD

• KMID: 2512741
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2021.41.1.114

Abstract

The Barricor tube (Becton Dickinson [BD], Sunnyvale, CA, USA) was recently developed to mechanically separate plasma by increasing the centrifugation rate. We compared the Barricor tube with existing serum- and plasma-based tubes based on 35 biochemical analytes and preanalytical turnaround time (TAT). Blood samples were collected from 30 healthy volunteers in a Barricor tube, serum separating tube (SST, Vacutainer SST II Tube 8.5 mL, #368972; BD), or plasma separating tube (PST, Vacutainer PST Tube 8.0 mL, #367964; BD) in random order. Next, 27 chemistry analytes, six immunochemistry analytes, and two cardiac markers were compared using Passing-Bablok regression and the Bland-Altman method. Preanalytical TAT was measured for each tube. The Barricor tube exhibited bias exceeding the desirable limit for nine and four analytes compared with the SST and PST, respectively. The Barricor tube lactate dehydrogenase value showed a bias of -10.29% and -9.86% compared with that of the SST and PST, respectively. The preanalytical TAT of Barricor tube was 8.8 minutes, which was the shortest among the three tubes. The clinical performance of the Barricor tube was equivalent to that of the SST and PST for most analytes, with an apparent advantage in preanalytical TAT. When using the Barricor tube, the reference range needs to be changed for some analytes that exceed the desirable bias limit.

Keyword

Barricor tube; Bias; Turnaround time; Analytes; Serum separating tube; Plasma separating tube

Reference

1. Fournier JE, Northrup V, Clark C, Fraser J, Howlett M, Atkinson P, et al. Evaluation of BD Vacutainer Barricor blood collection tubes for routine chemistry testing on a Roche Cobas 8000 Platform. Clin Biochem. 2018; 58:94–9.

2. Füzéry AK, Raizman JE, Goudreau BL, Moses K, Niemann K, Park J, et al. The BD Barricor blood collection tube is an acceptable and robust alternative to the PST for use with the Beckman AccuTnI+3 assay. Clin Biochem. 2017; 50:851–7.

3. Dupuy AM, Badiou S, Daubin D, Bargnoux AS, Magnan C, Klouche K, et al. Comparison of Barricor vs. lithium heparin tubes for selected routine biochemical analytes and evaluation of post centrifugation stability. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2018; 28:020902.

4. Cadamuro J, Mrazek C, Leichtle AB, Kipman U, Felder TK, Wiedemann H, et al. Influence of centrifugation conditions on the results of 77 routine clinical chemistry analytes using standard vacuum blood collection tubes and the new BD-Barricor tubes. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2018; 28:010704.

5. Arslan FD, Karakoyun I, Basok BI, Aksit MZ, Baysoy A, Ozturk YK, et al. The local clinical validation of a new lithium heparin tube with a barrier: BD Vacutainer Barricor LH Plasma tube. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2017; 27:030706.

6. Padoan A, Zaninotto M, Piva E, Sciacovelli L, Aita A, Tasinato A, et al. Quality of plasma samples and BD Vacutainer Barricor tubes: effects of centrifugation. Clin Chim Acta. 2018; 483:271–4.

7. Ramakers C. BD Vacutainer Barricor tube in the emergency department: reduced hemolysis rates using partial draw tubes with reduced vacuum. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018; 56:e31–2.

8. Desirable specifications for total Error, imprecision, and bias, derived from intra- and inter-individual biologic variation. https://www.westgard.com/biodatabase1.htm. accessed August 1st 2019.

9. Clinical laboratory improvement amendments of 1988: final rule. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Care Financing Administration. Federal Register 57, no. 7146. 1992.

10. Erdal EP, Mitra D, Khangulov VS, Church S, Plokhoy E. The economic impact of poor sample quality in clinical chemistry laboratories: results from a global survey. Ann Clin Biochem. 2017; 54:230–9.

11. Boyanton BL Jr, Blick KE. Stability studies of twenty-four analytes in human plasma and serum. Clin Chem. 2002; 48:2242–7.

12. Schrapp A, Mory C, Duflot T, Pereira T, Imbert L, Lamoureux F. The right blood collection tube for therapeutic drug monitoring and toxicology screening procedures: standard tubes, gel or mechanical separator? Clin Chim Acta. 2019; 488:196–201.

13. Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Montagnana M, Brocco G, Guidi GC. Influence of hemolysis on routine clinical chemistry testing. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2006; 44:311–6.

14. Zhang DJ, Elswick RK, Miller WG, Bailey JL. Effect of serum-clot contact time on clinical chemistry laboratory results. Clin Chem. 1998; 44:1325–33.

15. Monneret D, Godmer A, Le Guen R, Bravetti C, Emeraud C, Marteau A, et al. Stability of routine biochemical analytes in whole blood and plasma from lithium heparin gel tubes during 6-hr storage. J Clin Lab Anal. 2016; 30:602–9.

16. Chan FK, Moriwaki K, De Rosa MJ. Detection of necrosis by release of lactate dehydrogenase activity. Methods Mol Biol. 2013; 979:65–70.

17. Bowen RA, Hortin GL, Csako G, Otañez OH, Remaley AT. Impact of blood collection devices on clinical chemistry assays. Clin Biochem. 2010; 43:4–25.

18. Dimeski G, Yow KS, Brown NN. What is the most suitable blood collection tube for glucose estimation? Ann Clin Biochem. 2015; 52:270–5.

19. Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Lampus S, Danese E, Gelati M, Bovo C, et al. Impact of blood cell counts and volumes on glucose concentration in uncentrifuged serum and lithium-heparin blood tubes. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018; 56:2125–31.