Restor Dent Endod.  2020 Aug;45(3):e35. 10.5395/rde.2020.45.e35.

Calcium silicate-based root canal sealers: a literature review

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dankook University, Cheonan, Korea

Abstract

Epoxy resin-based sealers are currently widely used, and several studies have considered AH Plus to be the gold-standard sealer. However, it still has limitations, including possible mutagenicity, cytotoxicity, inflammatory response, and hydrophobicity. Drawing upon the advantages of mineral trioxide aggregate, calcium silicate-based sealers were introduced with high levels of biocompatibility and hydrophilicity. Because of the hydrophilic environment in root canals, water resorption and solubility of root canal sealers are important factors contributing to their stability. Sealers displaying lower microleakage and stronger push-out bond strength are also needed to endure the dynamic tooth environment. Although the physical properties of calcium silicate-based sealers meet International Organization for Standardization recommendations, and they have consistently reported to be biocompatible, they have not overcome conventional resin-based sealers in actual practice. Therefore, further studies aiming to improve the physical properties of calcium silicate-based sealers are needed.

Keyword

Bioactivity; Biocompatibility; Calcium silicate-based sealer; Push-out bond strength; Water resorption; Solubility

Cited by  2 articles

Bone repair in defects filled with AH Plus sealer and different concentrations of MTA: a study in rat tibiae
Jessica Emanuella Rocha Paz, Priscila Oliveira Costa, Albert Alexandre Costa Souza, Ingrid Macedo de Oliveira, Lucas Fernandes Falcão, Carlos Alberto Monteiro Falcão, Maria Ângela Area Leão Ferraz, Lucielma Salmito Soares Pinto
Restor Dent Endod. 2021;46(4):e48.    doi: 10.5395/rde.2021.46.e48.

Effect of endodontic sealer on postoperative pain: a network meta-analysis
Cynthia Maria Chaves Monteiro, Ana Cristina Rodrigues Martins, Alessandra Reis, Juliana Larocca de Geus
Restor Dent Endod. 2022;48(1):e5.    doi: 10.5395/rde.2023.48.e5.


Reference

1. Schilder H. Filling root canals in three dimensions. 1967. J Endod. 2006; 32:281–290. PMID: 16554195.
2. Ørstavik D. Materials used for root canal obturation: technical, biological and clinical testing. Endod Topics. 2005; 12:25–38.
3. Grossman L. Endodontic practice. 10th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Henry Kimpton Publishers;1981.
4. Manappallil JJ. Basic dental materials. 4th ed. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers;2015.
5. Berman LH, Hargreaves K, Cohen S. Cohen's pathways of the pulp expert consult. 10th ed. Maryland Heights (MO): Mosby Elsevier;2010.
6. Garrido AD, Lia RC, França SC, da Silva JF, Astolfi-Filho S, Sousa-Neto MD. Laboratory evaluation of the physicochemical properties of a new root canal sealer based on Copaifera multijuga oil-resin. Int Endod J. 2010; 43:283–291. PMID: 20487447.
7. Lee JK, Kwak SW, Ha JH, Lee W, Kim HC. Physicochemical properties of epoxy resin-based and bioceramic-based root canal sealers. Bioinorg Chem Appl. 2017; 2017:2582849. PMID: 28210204.
Article
8. Poggio C, Arciola CR, Dagna A, Colombo M, Bianchi S, Visai L. Solubility of root canal sealers: a comparative study. Int J Artif Organs. 2010; 33:676–681. PMID: 20963731.
Article
9. McMichen FR, Pearson G, Rahbaran S, Gulabivala K. A comparative study of selected physical properties of five root-canal sealers. Int Endod J. 2003; 36:629–635. PMID: 12950578.
Article
10. Schweikl H, Schmalz G, Federlin M. Mutagenicity of the root canal sealer AHPlus in the Ames test. Clin Oral Investig. 1998; 2:125–129.
Article
11. Azar NG, Heidari M, Bahrami ZS, Shokri F. In vitro cytotoxicity of a new epoxy resin root canal sealer. J Endod. 2000; 26:462–465. PMID: 11199780.
12. Cohen BI, Pagnillo MK, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. An in vitro study of the cytotoxicity of two root canal sealers. J Endod. 2000; 26:228–229. PMID: 11199724.
13. Sousa CJ, Montes CR, Pascon EA, Loyola AM, Versiani MA. Comparison of the intraosseous biocompatibility of AH Plus, EndoREZ, and Epiphany root canal sealers. J Endod. 2006; 32:656–662. PMID: 16793475.
Article
14. Roggendorf MJ, Ebert J, Petschelt A, Frankenberger R. Influence of moisture on the apical seal of root canal fillings with five different types of sealer. J Endod. 2007; 33:31–33. PMID: 17185125.
Article
15. Camilleri J, Montesin FE, Brady K, Sweeney R, Curtis RV, Ford TR. The constitution of mineral trioxide aggregate. Dent Mater. 2005; 21:297–303. PMID: 15766576.
Article
16. Asgary S, Parirokh M, Eghbal MJ, Stowe S, Brink F. A qualitative X-ray analysis of white and grey mineral trioxide aggregate using compositional imaging. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2006; 17:187–191. PMID: 16502252.
Article
17. Parirokh M, Torabinejad M. Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review--Part I: chemical, physical, and antibacterial properties. J Endod. 2010; 36:16–27. PMID: 20003930.
Article
18. Lee SJ, Monsef M, Torabinejad M. Sealing ability of a mineral trioxide aggregate for repair of lateral root perforations. J Endod. 1993; 19:541–544. PMID: 8151240.
Article
19. Darvell BW, Wu RC. “MTA”-an Hydraulic Silicate Cement: review update and setting reaction. Dent Mater. 2011; 27:407–422. PMID: 21353694.
Article
20. Donnermeyer D, Bürklein S, Dammaschke T, Schäfer E. Endodontic sealers based on calcium silicates: a systematic review. Odontology. 2019; 107:421–436. PMID: 30554288.
Article
21. Donnermeyer D, Dornseifer P, Schäfer E, Dammaschke T. The push-out bond strength of calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers. Head Face Med. 2018; 14:13. PMID: 30126425.
Article
22. Urban K, Neuhaus J, Donnermeyer D, Schäfer E, Dammaschke T. Solubility and pH value of 3 different root canal sealers: a long-term investigation. J Endod. 2018; 44:1736–1740. PMID: 30243663.
Article
23. Asawaworarit W, Yachor P, Kijsamanmith K, Vongsavan N. Comparison of the apical sealing ability of calcium silicate-based sealer and resin-based sealer using the fluid-filtration technique. Med Princ Pract. 2016; 25:561–565. PMID: 27599002.
Article
24. Siboni F, Taddei P, Zamparini F, Prati C, Gandolfi MG. Properties of BioRoot RCS, a tricalcium silicate endodontic sealer modified with povidone and polycarboxylate. Int Endod J. 2017; 50(Suppl 2):e120–e136. PMID: 28881478.
Article
25. Vitti RP, Prati C, Silva EJ, Sinhoreti MA, Zanchi CH, de Souza e Silva MG, Ogliari FA, Piva E, Gandolfi MG. Physical properties of MTA Fillapex sealer. J Endod. 2013; 39:915–918. PMID: 23791263.
Article
26. International Organization of Standardization. International Standard ISO 6876. Specification for dental root canal sealing materials. 3rd ed. Geneva: International Organization of Standardization;2012.
27. Kebudi Benezra M, Schembri Wismayer P, Camilleri J. Influence of environment on testing of hydraulic sealers. Sci Rep. 2017; 7:17927. PMID: 29263328.
Article
28. Borges RP, Sousa-Neto MD, Versiani MA, Rached-Júnior FA, De-Deus G, Miranda CE, Pécora JD. Changes in the surface of four calcium silicate-containing endodontic materials and an epoxy resin-based sealer after a solubility test. Int Endod J. 2012; 45:419–428. PMID: 22150403.
Article
29. Zhou HM, Shen Y, Zheng W, Li L, Zheng YF, Haapasalo M. Physical properties of 5 root canal sealers. J Endod. 2013; 39:1281–1286. PMID: 24041392.
Article
30. Ersahan S, Aydin C. Solubility and apical sealing characteristics of a new calcium silicate-based root canal sealer in comparison to calcium hydroxide-, methacrylate resin- and epoxy resin-based sealers. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013; 71:857–862. PMID: 23088627.
Article
31. Poggio C, Dagna A, Ceci M, Meravini MV, Colombo M, Pietrocola G. Solubility and pH of bioceramic root canal sealers: a comparative study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017; 9:e1189–e1194. PMID: 29167707.
Article
32. Colombo M, Poggio C, Dagna A, Meravini MV, Riva P, Trovati F, Pietrocola G. Biological and physico-chemical properties of new root canal sealers. J Clin Exp Dent. 2018; 10:e120–e126. PMID: 29670728.
Article
33. Prüllage RK, Urban K, Schäfer E, Dammaschke T. Material properties of a tricalcium silicate-containing, a mineral trioxide aggregate-containing, and an epoxy resin-based root canal sealer. J Endod. 2016; 42:1784–1788. PMID: 27769676.
Article
34. Wu MK, De Gee AJ, Wesselink PR, Moorer WR. Fluid transport and bacterial penetration along root canal fillings. Int Endod J. 1993; 26:203–208. PMID: 8225638.
Article
35. Kim Y, Kim BS, Kim YM, Lee D, Kim SY. The penetration ability of calcium silicate root canal sealers into dentinal tubules compared to conventional resin-based sealer: a confocal laser scanning microscopy study. Materials (Basel). 2019; 12:E531. PMID: 30754612.
Article
36. Ballullaya SV, Vinay V, Thumu J, Devalla S, Bollu IP, Balla S. Stereomicroscopic dye leakage measurement of six different root canal sealers. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017; 11:ZC65–ZC68. PMID: 28764296.
Article
37. Pawar SS, Pujar MA, Makandar SD. Evaluation of the apical sealing ability of bioceramic sealer, AH plus & epiphany: an in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2014; 17:579–582. PMID: 25506149.
38. Jafari F, Jafari S. Importance and methodologies of endodontic microleakage studies: a systematic review. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017; 9:e812–e819. PMID: 28638561.
Article
39. Atmeh AR, Chong EZ, Richard G, Festy F, Watson TF. Dentin-cement interfacial interaction: calcium silicates and polyalkenoates. J Dent Res. 2012; 91:454–459. PMID: 22436906.
40. Jeong JW, DeGraft-Johnson A, Dorn SO, Di Fiore PM. Dentinal tubule penetration of a calcium silicate-based root canal sealer with different obturation methods. J Endod. 2017; 43:633–637. PMID: 28216267.
Article
41. Holland R, de Souza V, Nery MJ, Otoboni Filho JA, Bernabé PF, Dezan Júnior E. Reaction of rat connective tissue to implanted dentin tubes filled with mineral trioxide aggregate or calcium hydroxide. J Endod. 1999; 25:161–166. PMID: 10321179.
Article
42. Gandolfi MG, Prati C. MTA and F-doped MTA cements used as sealers with warm gutta-percha. Long-term study of sealing ability. Int Endod J. 2010; 43:889–901. PMID: 20618878.
Article
43. Iacono F, Gandolfi MG, Huffman B, Sword J, Agee K, Siboni F, Tay F, Prati C, Pashley D. Push-out strength of modified Portland cements and resins. Am J Dent. 2010; 23:43–46. PMID: 20437727.
44. Weller RN, Tay KC, Garrett LV, Mai S, Primus CM, Gutmann JL, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Microscopic appearance and apical seal of root canals filled with gutta-percha and ProRoot Endo Sealer after immersion in a phosphate-containing fluid. Int Endod J. 2008; 41:977–986. PMID: 19133087.
Article
45. Neelakantan P, Subbarao C, Subbarao CV, De-Deus G, Zehnder M. The impact of root dentine conditioning on sealing ability and push-out bond strength of an epoxy resin root canal sealer. Int Endod J. 2011; 44:491–498. PMID: 21255047.
Article
46. Lee YL, Lin FH, Wang WH, Ritchie HH, Lan WH, Lin CP. Effects of EDTA on the hydration mechanism of mineral trioxide aggregate. J Dent Res. 2007; 86:534–538. PMID: 17525353.
Article
47. Wu MK, Bud MG, Wesselink PR. The quality of single cone and laterally compacted gutta-percha fillings in small and curved root canals as evidenced by bidirectional radiographs and fluid transport measurements. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009; 108:946–951. PMID: 19875314.
Article
48. Zhang W, Li Z, Peng B. Assessment of a new root canal sealer's apical sealing ability. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009; 107:e79–e82. PMID: 19464650.
Article
49. Fernández R, Restrepo JS, Aristizábal DC, Álvarez LG. Evaluation of the filling ability of artificial lateral canals using calcium silicate-based and epoxy resin-based endodontic sealers and two gutta-percha filling techniques. Int Endod J. 2016; 49:365–373. PMID: 25827199.
Article
50. Nagas E, Cehreli Z, Uyanik MO, Durmaz V. Bond strength of a calcium silicate-based sealer tested in bulk or with different main core materials. Braz Oral Res. 2014; 28:S1806-83242014000100256.
Article
51. DeLong C, He J, Woodmansey KF. The effect of obturation technique on the push-out bond strength of calcium silicate sealers. J Endod. 2015; 41:385–388. PMID: 25576202.
Article
52. Reyes-Carmona JF, Felippe MS, Felippe WT. The biomineralization ability of mineral trioxide aggregate and Portland cement on dentin enhances the push-out strength. J Endod. 2010; 36:286–291. PMID: 20113792.
Article
53. Camilleri J. Sealers and warm gutta-percha obturation techniques. J Endod. 2015; 41:72–78. PMID: 25115660.
Article
54. Viapiana R, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Tanomaru-Filho M, Camilleri J. Investigation of the effect of sealer use on the heat generated at the external root surface during root canal obturation using warm vertical compaction technique with System B heat source. J Endod. 2014; 40:555–561. PMID: 24666911.
55. Dabaj P, Kalender A, Unverdi Eldeniz A. Push-out bond strength and SEM evaluation in roots filled with two different techniques using new and conventional sealers. Materials (Basel). 2018; 11:E1620. PMID: 30189631.
Article
56. Qu W, Bai W, Liang YH, Gao XJ. Influence of warm vertical compaction technique on physical properties of root canal sealers. J Endod. 2016; 42:1829–1833. PMID: 27776877.
Article
57. Zhang W, Li Z, Peng B. Ex vivo cytotoxicity of a new calcium silicate-based canal filling material. Int Endod J. 2010; 43:769–774. PMID: 20546044.
58. Chang SW, Lee SY, Kang SK, Kum KY, Kim EC. In vitro biocompatibility, inflammatory response, and osteogenic potential of 4 root canal sealers: Sealapex, Sankin apatite root sealer, MTA Fillapex, and iRoot SP root canal sealer. J Endod. 2014; 40:1642–1648. PMID: 25260738.
59. Eldeniz AU, Shehata M, Högg C, Reichl FX. DNA double-strand breaks caused by new and contemporary endodontic sealers. Int Endod J. 2016; 49:1141–1151. PMID: 26574345.
Article
60. Jung S, Libricht V, Sielker S, Hanisch MR, Schäfer E, Dammaschke T. Evaluation of the biocompatibility of root canal sealers on human periodontal ligament cells ex vivo . Odontology. 2019; 107:54–63. PMID: 30039235.
61. Taraslia V, Anastasiadou E, Lignou C, Keratiotis G, Agrafioti A, Kontakiotis EG. Assessment of cell viability in four novel endodontic sealers. Eur J Dent. 2018; 12:287–291. PMID: 29988252.
Article
62. Ames JM, Loushine RJ, Babb BR, Bryan TE, Lockwood PE, Sui M, Roberts S, Weller RN, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Contemporary methacrylate resin-based root canal sealers exhibit different degrees of ex vivo cytotoxicity when cured in their self-cured mode. J Endod. 2009; 35:225–228. PMID: 19166778.
63. Collado-González M, García-Bernal D, Oñate-Sánchez RE, Ortolani-Seltenerich PS, Lozano A, Forner L, Llena C, Rodríguez-Lozano FJ. Biocompatibility of three new calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers on human periodontal ligament stem cells. Int Endod J. 2017; 50:875–884. PMID: 27666949.
Article
64. Kebudi Benezra M, Schembri Wismayer P, Camilleri J. Interfacial characteristics and cytocompatibility of hydraulic sealer cements. J Endod. 2018; 44:1007–1017. PMID: 29398087.
Article
65. Zhou HM, Du TF, Shen Y, Wang ZJ, Zheng YF, Haapasalo M. In vitro cytotoxicity of calcium silicate-containing endodontic sealers. J Endod. 2015; 41:56–61. PMID: 25442721.
66. Poggio C, Riva P, Chiesa M, Colombo M, Pietrocola G. Comparative cytotoxicity evaluation of eight root canal sealers. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017; 9:e574–e578. PMID: 28469826.
Article
67. da Silva EJ, Zaia AA, Peters OA. Cytocompatibility of calcium silicate-based sealers in a three-dimensional cell culture model. Clin Oral Investig. 2017; 21:1531–1536.
Article
68. Portella FF, Collares FM, Dos Santos LA, dos Santos BP, Camassola M, Leitune VC, Samuel SM. Glycerol salicylate-based containing α-tricalcium phosphate as a bioactive root canal sealer. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2015; 103:1663–1669. PMID: 25611332.
Article
69. Loushine BA, Bryan TE, Looney SW, Gillen BM, Loushine RJ, Weller RN, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Setting properties and cytotoxicity evaluation of a premixed bioceramic root canal sealer. J Endod. 2011; 37:673–677. PMID: 21496669.
Article
70. Lee BN, Hong JU, Kim SM, Jang JH, Chang HS, Hwang YC, Hwang IN, Oh WM. Anti-inflammatory and osteogenic effects of calcium silicate-based root canal sealers. J Endod. 2019; 45:73–78. PMID: 30558800.
Article
71. Zhang H, Shen Y, Ruse ND, Haapasalo M. Antibacterial activity of endodontic sealers by modified direct contact test against Enterococcus faecalis . J Endod. 2009; 35:1051–1055. PMID: 19567333.
72. Sjögren U, Figdor D, Persson S, Sundqvist G. Influence of infection at the time of root filling on the outcome of endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis. Int Endod J. 1997; 30:297–306. PMID: 9477818.
Article
73. Stuart CH, Schwartz SA, Beeson TJ, Owatz CB. Enterococcus faecalis: its role in root canal treatment failure and current concepts in retreatment. J Endod. 2006; 32:93–98. PMID: 16427453.
74. Desai S, Chandler N. Calcium hydroxide-based root canal sealers: a review. J Endod. 2009; 35:475–480. PMID: 19345790.
Article
75. Jafari F, Jafari S. Composition and physicochemical properties of calcium silicate based sealers: a review article. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017; 9:e1249–e1255. PMID: 29167717.
Article
76. Cai M, Abbott P, Castro Salgado J. Hydroxyl ion diffusion through radicular dentine when calcium hydroxide is used under different conditions. Materials (Basel). 2018; 11:E152. PMID: 29342093.
77. Candeiro GT, Moura-Netto C, D'Almeida-Couto RS, Azambuja-Júnior N, Marques MM, Cai S, Gavini G. Cytotoxicity, genotoxicity and antibacterial effectiveness of a bioceramic endodontic sealer. Int Endod J. 2016; 49:858–864. PMID: 26281002.
Article
78. Arias-Moliz MT, Camilleri J. The effect of the final irrigant on the antimicrobial activity of root canal sealers. J Dent. 2016; 52:30–36. PMID: 27377571.
Article
79. Wang Z, Shen Y, Haapasalo M. Dentin extends the antibacterial effect of endodontic sealers against Enterococcus faecalis biofilms. J Endod. 2014; 40:505–508. PMID: 24666900.
80. Alsubait S, Albader S, Alajlan N, Alkhunaini N, Niazy A, Almahdy A. Comparison of the antibacterial activity of calcium silicate- and epoxy resin-based endodontic sealers against Enterococcus faecalis biofilms: a confocal laser-scanning microscopy analysis. Odontology. 2019; 107:513–520. PMID: 30927150.
81. Nirupama DN, Nainan MT, Ramaswamy R, Muralidharan S, Usha HH, Sharma R, Gupta S. In vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial efficacy of four endodontic biomaterials against Enterococcus faecalis, Candida albicans, and Staphylococcus aureus . Int J Biomater. 2014; 2014:383756. PMID: 25371678.
82. Shin JH, Lee DY, Lee SH. Comparison of antimicrobial activity of traditional and new developed root sealers against pathogens related root canal. J Dent Sci. 2018; 13:54–59. PMID: 30895095.
Article
83. Willershausen I, Callaway A, Briseño B, Willershausen B. In vitro analysis of the cytotoxicity and the antimicrobial effect of four endodontic sealers. Head Face Med. 2011; 7:15. PMID: 21831282.
Article
84. Kokubo T, Takadama H. How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity? Biomaterials. 2006; 27:2907–2915. PMID: 16448693.
85. Zhang W, Li Z, Peng B. Effects of iRoot SP on mineralization-related genes expression in MG63 cells. J Endod. 2010; 36:1978–1982. PMID: 21092816.
Article
86. Camps J, Jeanneau C, El Ayachi I, Laurent P, About I. Bioactivity of a calcium silicate-based endodontic cement (BioRoot RCS): interactions with human periodontal ligament cells in vitro . J Endod. 2015; 41:1469–1473. PMID: 26001857.
87. Güven EP, Taşlı PN, Yalvac ME, Sofiev N, Kayahan MB, Sahin F. In vitro comparison of induction capacity and biomineralization ability of mineral trioxide aggregate and a bioceramic root canal sealer. Int Endod J. 2013; 46:1173–1182. PMID: 23617276.
88. Loison-Robert LS, Tassin M, Bonte E, Berbar T, Isaac J, Berdal A, Simon S, Fournier BP. In vitro effects of two silicate-based materials, Biodentine and BioRoot RCS, on dental pulp stem cells in models of reactionary and reparative dentinogenesis. PLoS One. 2018; 13:e0190014. PMID: 29370163.
89. Dimitrova-Nakov S, Uzunoglu E, Ardila-Osorio H, Baudry A, Richard G, Kellermann O, Goldberg M. In vitro bioactivity of Bioroot™ RCS, via A4 mouse pulpal stem cells. Dent Mater. 2015; 31:1290–1297. PMID: 26364144.
90. Yoo YJ, Baek SH, Kum KY, Shon WJ, Woo KM, Lee W. Dynamic intratubular biomineralization following root canal obturation with pozzolan-based mineral trioxide aggregate sealer cement. Scanning. 2016; 38:50–56. PMID: 26179659.
Article
91. Nawal RR, Parande M, Sehgal R, Naik A, Rao NR. A comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy and flow properties for Epiphany, Guttaflow and AH-Plus sealer. Int Endod J. 2011; 44:307–313. PMID: 21219358.
Article
92. Al-Haddad A, Che Ab Aziz ZA. Bioceramic-based root canal sealers: a review. Int J Biomater. 2016; 2016:9753210. PMID: 27242904.
Article
93. Uzunoglu-Özyürek E, Erdoğan Ö, Aktemur Türker S. Effect of calcium hydroxide dressing on the dentinal tubule penetration of 2 different root canal sealers: a confocal laser scanning microscopic study. J Endod. 2018; 44:1018–1023. PMID: 29680722.
Article
94. Viapiana R, Moinzadeh AT, Camilleri L, Wesselink PR, Tanomaru Filho M, Camilleri J. Porosity and sealing ability of root fillings with gutta-percha and BioRoot RCS or AH Plus sealers. Evaluation by three ex vivo methods. Int Endod J. 2016; 49:774–782. PMID: 26199130.
95. Hwang JH, Chung J, Na HS, Park E, Kwak S, Kim HC. Comparison of bacterial leakage resistance of various root canal filling materials and methods: confocal laser-scanning microscope study. Scanning. 2015; 37:422–428. PMID: 26114421.
Article
96. Deniz Sungur D, Moinzadeh AT, Wesselink PR, Çalt Tarhan S, Özok AR. Sealing efficacy of a single-cone root filling after post space preparation. Clin Oral Investig. 2016; 20:1071–1077.
Article
97. Oh S, Cho SI, Perinpanayagam H, You J, Hong SH, Yoo YJ, Chang SW, Shon WJ, Yoo JS, Baek SH, Kum KY. Novel calcium zirconate silicate cement biomineralize and seal root canals. Materials (Basel). 2018; 11:E588. PMID: 29641475.
Article
98. Bidar M, Sadeghalhoseini N, Forghani M, Attaran N. Effect of the smear layer on apical seals produced by two calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers. J Oral Sci. 2014; 56:215–219. PMID: 25231148.
Article
99. Ulusoy OI, Nayir Y, Celik K, Yaman SD. Apical microleakage of different root canal sealers after use of maleic acid and EDTA as final irrigants. Braz Oral Res. 2014; 28:S1806-83242014000100257.
Article
100. Donnermeyer D, Vahdat-Pajouh N, Schäfer E, Dammaschke T. Influence of the final irrigation solution on the push-out bond strength of calcium silicate-based, epoxy resin-based and silicone-based endodontic sealers. Odontology. 2019; 107:231–236. PMID: 30276580.
Article
101. Silva EJ, Carvalho NK, Prado MC, Zanon M, Senna PM, Souza EM, De-Deus G. Push-out bond strength of injectable Pozzolan-based root canal sealer. J Endod. 2016; 42:1656–1659. PMID: 27641946.
Article
102. Ersahan S, Aydin C. Dislocation resistance of iRoot SP, a calcium silicate-based sealer, from radicular dentine. J Endod. 2010; 36:2000–2002. PMID: 21092821.
Article
103. Alsubait SA, Al Ajlan R, Mitwalli H, Aburaisi N, Mahmood A, Muthurangan M, Almadhri R, Alfayez M, Anil S. Cytotoxicity of different concentrations of three root canal sealers on human mesenchymal stem cells. Biomolecules. 2018; 8:E68. PMID: 30071665.
Article
104. Lim ES, Park YB, Kwon YS, Shon WJ, Lee KW, Min KS. Physical properties and biocompatibility of an injectable calcium-silicate-based root canal sealer: in vitro and in vivo study. BMC Oral Health. 2015; 15:129. PMID: 26490372.
Article
Full Text Links
  • RDE
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr