J Neurocrit Care.  2020 Dec;13(2):80-85. 10.18700/jnc.200011.

Minimal-risk traumatic brain injury management without neurosurgical consultation

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Trauma, Emergency General Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
  • 2School of Nursing, Adult-Gerontology Acute Care Program, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
  • 3Critical Illness, Brain Dysfunction, and Survivorship (CIBS) Center, Vanderbilt Brain Institute, Center for Health Services Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
  • 4Departments of Neurosurgery and Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
  • 5Nashville Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center, Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Nashville, TN, USA

Abstract

Background
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) with intracranial hemorrhage management results in clinical practice variability, complexity, and/or limitations in acute care surgical and radiological workflow, which can prompt neurosurgical consultation, even when unnecessary. To facilitate an interdisciplinary practice for minimal-risk TBI, our objective was to create and sustain a neurotrauma protocol change that we hypothesized would not result in outcome differences.
Methods
A retrospective pre-post cohort study was conducted over an eight-month period to evaluate the protocol change toward trauma team management of TBI with isolated pneumocephalus and/or subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) given a normal neurologic exam (i.e., minimal-risk TBI) without neurosurgery consultation. Demographics of age and Glasgow coma scale (GCS) were collected and expressed in means. Target outcomes consisted of protocol compliance, management compliance (e.g., nursing neurologic checks, thromboembolism prophylaxis, seizure prophylaxis, speech-cognitive testing, follow-up), neurological worsening, increasing therapeutic intensity levels, and TBI-related 30-day readmission.
Results
Of the 49 patients included, 21 were in the pre-group (age, 54.19 years; GCS, 15) and 28 were in the post-group (age, 52.25 years; GCS, 15). There was 5% and 36% non-compliance with pre- and post-protocol practices in terms of neurosurgery consultation rates. In both pre- and post-periods, management compliance was similar, and none of the TBI patients experienced a worsening neurologic exam, increased therapeutic intensity level, or re-admission.
Conclusion
Minimal TBI-risk protocol compliance was weaker after the practice change although management compliance and outcomes remained unchanged. This work supports that minimal-risk TBI patients with SAH and normal neurologic exams can be safely managed by trauma teams without neurosurgery consultation.

Keyword

Traumatic brain injury; Quality improvement; Neurotrauma; Trauma surgery; Neurosurgery

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Minimal-risk traumatic brain injury without neurosurgery. ED, emergency department; CT, computed tomography; GCS, Glasgow coma scale; SAH, subarachnoid hemorrhage; IPH, intraparenchymal hemorrhage; EDH, epidural hemorrhage; SDH, subdural hemorrhage; Q4h, every 4 hours; Surgery OK 12 hr post-injury, surgery authorized on/after 12 hours post-injury; Q2h, every 2 hours; TBI, traumatic brain injury; DVT, deep-venous thrombosis.


Reference

1. Ditty BJ, Omar NB, Foreman PM, Patel DM, Pritchard PR, Okor MO. The nonsurgical nature of patients with subarachnoid or intraparenchymal hemorrhage associated with mild traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 2015; 123:649–53.
Article
2. Overton TL, Shafi S, Cravens GF, Gandhi RR. Can trauma surgeons manage mild traumatic brain injuries? Am J Surg. 2014; 208:806–10.
Article
3. Joseph B, Friese RS, Sadoun M, Aziz H, Kulvatunyou N, Pandit V, et al. The BIG (brain injury guidelines) project: defining the management of traumatic brain injury by acute care surgeons. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014; 76:965–9.
4. Joseph B, Haider AA, Pandit V, Tang A, Kulvatunyou N, OʼKeeffe T, et al. Changing paradigms in the management of 2184 patients with traumatic brain injury. Ann Surg. 2015; 262:440–8.
Article
5. Guillamondegui O, Hamblin S. Practice management guidelines for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care [Internet]. 2016. [cited 2020 Aug 17]. Available from: https://www.vumc.org/trauma-and-scc/sites/vumc.org.trauma-and-scc/files/public_files/Protocols/Trauma%20DVT%20Prophylaxis%20Guidelines%202016%20update%20for%20website2.pdf.
6. Patel M, Dewan M, Hamblin S, Banes C. Practice management guidelines for seizure prophylaxis: Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care [Internet]. 2016. [cited 2020 Aug 17]. Available from: https://www.vumc.org/trauma-and-scc/sites/vumc.org.trauma-and-scc/files/public_files/Protocols/Practice%20Management%20Guidelines%20for%20Seizure%20Prophylaxis-062116.pdf.
7. Lewis PR, Dunne CE, Wallace JD, Brill JB, Calvo RY, Badiee J, et al. Routine neurosurgical consultation is not necessary in mild blunt traumatic brain injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017; 82:776–80.
Article
8. Nahmias J, Doben A, DeBusk G, Winston S, Alouidor R, Kaye T, et al. Mild traumatic brain injuries can be safely managed without neurosurgical consultation: the end of a neurosurgical "nonsult". Am Surg. 2018; 84:652–7.
Article
9. Wu C, Orringer DA, Lau D, Fletcher JJ. Cumulative incidence and predictors of neurosurgical interventions following nonsevere traumatic brain injury with mildly abnormal head imaging findings. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012; 73:1247–53.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JNC
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr