Ann Surg Treat Res.  2020 Nov;99(5):294-304. 10.4174/astr.2020.99.5.294.

Refined surgical techniques to improve the patency of cryopreserved iliac artery homografts for middle hepatic vein reconstruction during living donor liver transplantation

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Liver Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

Purpose
A cryopreserved iliac artery homograft (IAH) has not been considered suitable for middle hepatic vein (MHV) reconstruction during living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), primarily due to the low patency from its small diameter. We revised our surgical techniques for MHV reconstruction using an IAH to improve its patency.
Methods
This study analyzed the causes of early conduit occlusion and developed revised techniques to address this that had clinical application.
Results
The potential risk factors for early conduit occlusion were the small IAH size, small graft in the segment V vein (V5) and segment VIII vein (V8) opening, and small recipient MHV-left hepatic vein stump. These factors were reflected to our revised surgical methods which included endarterectomy of the atherosclerotic plaque, unification of the internal and external iliac artery branches for large V5, and branch-patch arterioplasty for large V8. IAH endarterectomy, branch unification technique, and branch-patch arterioplasty were applied to 8, 5, and 5 patients, respectively and resulted in 1-month occlusion rates of 37.5%, 20.0%, and 40.0%, respectively. The overall patency rates of the IAH-MHV conduits in our 18 patients were 66.7% at 1 month, 38.9% at 3 months, and 33.3% at 1 year.
Conclusion
Our refined MHV reconstruction using an IAH improved short-term MHV conduit patency, but did not effectively prevent early conduit occlusion, particularly with a small- or medium-sized IAH. Individualized reconstruction designs during LDLT operation are needed when an IAH is used for a modified right liver graft.

Keyword

Arterioplasty; Endarterectomy; Hepatic venous congestion; Iliac vein graft

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Intraoperative photographs showing a conventional technique for middle hepatic vein reconstruction using a large-sized cryopreserved iliac artery homograft (IAH). No arterioplasty of the IAH was applied. (A) A large-sized IAH was prepared. (B) The internal iliac artery branch was anastomosed to the graft segment VIII vein (V8) opening. (C) The external iliac artery branch was anastomosed to the graft V5 opening. (D) The IAH conduit was anastomosed to the middle-left hepatic vein stump of the recipient inferior vena cava. The conduit was patent for more than 1 year after transplantation.

  • Fig. 2 Intraoperative photographs showing a suboptimal middle hepatic vein reconstruction technique using a small-sized cryopreserved iliac artery homograft (IAH). (A) A small-sized IAH was prepared. (B) The internal iliac artery branch was anastomosed to the graft segment VIII vein (V8) opening. (C) The external iliac artery branch was anastomosed to the graft V5 opening. (D) The recipient middle hepatic vein stump was closed for size matching and the IAH conduit was anastomosed only to the left hepatic vein stump of the recipient inferior vena cava. The conduit was occluded within 1 week after transplantation and transjugular stenting was therefore performed.

  • Fig. 3 Intraoperative photographs showing a successful ex situ endarterectomy procedure. (A) The outer contour of the cryopreserved iliac artery homograft (IAH) was examined. (B) The atheroma was gently pulled out through eversion of the adventitia. (C) The luminal surface of the adventitia was shiny, indicating a very smooth surface. (D) The endarterectomized IAH conduit was used for reconstruction of the graft middle hepatic vein branches.

  • Fig. 4 Intraoperative photographs showing a suboptimal ex situ endarterectomy procedure. (A) The atheroma was forcefully pulled out because it was not easily detached from the adventitia. (B) The rough surface of the atheroma plaque reflected the counterpart surface status of the adventitial lumen. (C) The endarterectomized iliac artery homograft (IAH) conduit was used for reconstruction of the graft middle hepatic vein branches. The external iliac artery portion appeared to be very thin. (D) The paper-thin portion of the IAH conduit was reinforced by spraying fibrin glue. The graft segment V vein (V5) was occluded within 1 week after transplantation, but stenting was not performed because the V8 flow was preserved.

  • Fig. 5 Intraoperative photographs showing the branch unification technique. (A) The internal and external iliac artery branches and their crotch portion were incised and their anterior and posterior walls were sutured to enlarge the luminal diameter. (B) The unification sutures were designed to exactly match to the graft middle hepatic vein openings. (C) The graft segment V vein (V5) was anastomosed in the end-to-end mode and the graft V8 was reconstructed in the end-to-side mode. (D) The conduit was used for reconstruction of the graft middle hepatic vein branches.

  • Fig. 6 Intraoperative photographs showing a modified branch unification technique for a single segment V vein (V5) or V8 reconstruction. (A) A small-sized external iliac artery-femoral artery homograft was prepared. (B) The artery was longitudinally incised. (C) Unification sutures converted the long patch into a large-sized tube. (D) The enlarged tube conduit was used for connection of the V8 and right hepatic vein orifice. (E) The right hepatic vein orifice was enlarged using a caudal incision and patch plasty. (F) The unified orifice of the right graft outflow vein was anastomosed to the recipient right hepatic vein stump.

  • Fig. 7 Intraoperative photographs showing the procedures for branch-patch arterioplasty. (A) A large-sized iliac artery homograft (IAH) was prepared. (B) The internal iliac artery branch and its crotch portion were incised longitudinally and some of the external iliac artery wall was excised. (C) The dorsal side of the internal iliac artery patch and the corresponding external iliac artery wall was anastomosed to form a dome-like roof. An arterial patch was attached to the graft segment VIII vein (V8) opening. (D) The dome-like orifice was attached to the V8 opening that was enlarged by using patch plasty. (E) The graft V5 was anastomosed in the end-to-side mode. (F) The IAH conduit was used for reconstruction of the graft middle hepatic vein branches.

  • Fig. 8 Intraoperative photographs showing the procedures for branch-patch arterioplasty. (A) A medium-sized iliac artery homograft (IAH) was prepared. (B) The internal iliac artery branch was incised longitudinally and some of the external iliac artery wall was incised. The dorsal side of the internal iliac artery patch and the external iliac artery wall was anastomosed to form a dome-like roof and enlarged orifice. (C) An arterial patch was attached to the graft segment VIII vein (V8) opening. (D) The graft V8 and V5 openings were anastomosed to the IAH conduit. (E) The IAH conduit was used for reconstruction of the graft middle hepatic vein branches.

  • Fig. 9 Luminal patency curve for the middle hepatic vein reconstruction using cryopreserved iliac artery homografts.


Reference

1. Hwang S, Lee SG, Lee YJ, Sung KB, Park KM, Kim KH, et al. Lessons learned from 1,000 living donor liver transplantations in a single center: how to make living donations safe. Liver Transpl. 2006; 12:920–927. PMID: 16721780.
2. Hwang S, Lee SG, Ahn CS, Park KM, Kim KH, Moon DB, et al. Cryopreserved iliac artery is indispensable interposition graft material for middle hepatic vein reconstruction of right liver grafts. Liver Transpl. 2005; 11:644–649. PMID: 15915499.
3. Sugawara Y, Makuuchi M, Akamatsu N, Kishi Y, Niiya T, Kaneko J, et al. Refinement of venous reconstruction using cryopreserved veins in right liver grafts. Liver Transpl. 2004; 10:541–547. PMID: 15048798.
4. Hwang S, Lee SG, Song GW, Lee HJ, Park JI, Ryu JH. Use of endarterectomized atherosclerotic artery allograft for hepatic vein reconstruction of living donor right lobe graft. Liver Transpl. 2007; 13:306–308. PMID: 17256786.
5. Hwang S, Jung DH, Ha TY, Ahn CS, Moon DB, Kim KH, et al. Usability of ringed polytetrafluoroethylene grafts for middle hepatic vein reconstruction during living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2012; 18:955–965. PMID: 22511404.
6. Kim SH, Hwang S, Ha TY, Song GW, Jung DH, Ahn CS, et al. Usability of cryopreserved aortic allografts for middle hepatic vein reconstruction during living-donor liver transplantation. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016; 20:1049–1055. PMID: 26666546.
7. Park GC, Hwang S, Ha TY, Song GW, Jung DH, Ahn CS, et al. Hemashield vascular graft is a preferable prosthetic graft for middle hepatic vein reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation. Ann Transplant. 2019; 24:639–646. PMID: 31844037.
8. Ha TY, Hwang S, Jung DH, Ahn CS, Kim KH, Moon DB, et al. Complications analysis of polytetrafluoroethylene grafts used for middle hepatic vein reconstruction in living-donor liver transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2014; 46:845–849. PMID: 24767363.
9. Hsu SC, Thorat A, Yang HR, Poon KS, Li PC, Yeh CC, et al. Assessing the safety of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene synthetic grafts in living donor liver transplantation: graft migration into hollow viscous organs. Diagnosis and treatment options. Med Sci Monit. 2017; 23:3284–3292. PMID: 28683053.
10. Koc C, Akbulut S, Ozdemir F, Kose A, Isik B, Yologlu S, et al. Analysis of risk factors affecting the development of infection in artificial vascular grafts used for reconstruction of middle hepatic vein tributaries in living donor liver transplantation. Transplantation. 2019; 103:1871–1876. PMID: 30747841.
11. Chung MH, Chuang CC, Liaw LF, Chen CY, Chen IM, Hsu CP, et al. Thrombotic ringed polytetrafluoroethylene graft with infection after living-donor liver transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2018; 50:2606–2610. PMID: 30401360.
12. Ko GY, Sung KB, Yoon HK, Kim JH, Song HY, Seo TS, et al. Endovascular treatment of hepatic venous outflow obstruction after living-donor liver transplantation. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2002; 13:591–599. PMID: 12050299.
13. Ko GY, Sung KB, Yoon HK, Kim KR, Kim JH, Gwon DI, et al. Early posttransplant hepatic venous outflow obstruction: longterm efficacy of primary stent placement. Liver Transpl. 2008; 14:1505–1511. PMID: 18825710.
14. Kirchner VA, Hwang S, Song GW, Ahn CS, Moon DB, Kim KH, et al. Resolution of hepatic venous congestion following gradual occlusion of middle hepatic vein interposition graft in living donor liver transplantation. Ann Transplant. 2016; 21:619–625. PMID: 27713391.
15. Hwang S, Lee SG, Park KM, Kim KH, Ahn CS, Lee YJ, et al. Hepatic venous congestion in living donor liver transplantation: preoperative quantitative prediction and follow-up using computed tomography. Liver Transpl. 2004; 10:763–770. PMID: 15162471.
16. Ha TY, Kim YH, Chang JW, Park Y, Han Y, Kwon H, et al. Clinical outcomes of cryopreserved arterial allograft used as a vascular conduit for hemodialysis. J Korean Med Sci. 2016; 31:1266–1272. PMID: 27478338.
17. Kwon H, Kwon H, Hong JP, Han Y, Park H, Song GW, et al. Use of cryopreserved cadaveric arterial allograft as a vascular conduit for peripheral arterial graft infection. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2015; 89:51–54. PMID: 26131446.
Full Text Links
  • ASTR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr