Korean Circ J.  2020 Oct;50(10):923-924. 10.4070/kcj.2020.0353.

Sapien 3 versus Sapien XT Balloonexpanding Valve for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Improved Immediate and Late Outcomes at the Expense of Smaller Effective Orifice Area

• Ko YG

• KMID: 2507009
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2020.0353

Reference

1. Al-Azizi K, Hamandi M, Mack M. Clinical trials of transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Heart. 2019; 105:s6–s9. PMID: 30846518.

2. Kim C, Hong MK. Aortic stenosis and transcatheter aortic valve implantation: current status and future directions in Korea. Korean Circ J. 2019; 49:283–297. PMID: 30895756.

3. Yu CW, Kim WJ, Ahn JM, et al. Trends and outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in Korea: the results of the first cohort of Korean TAVI registry. Korean Circ J. 2018; 48:382–394. PMID: 29671283.

4. Ribeiro HB, Urena M, Allende R, Amat-Santos IJ, Rodés-Cabau J. Balloon-expandable prostheses for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2014; 56:583–595. PMID: 24838134.

5. Kook H, Jang DH, Yang KS, et al. Comparing the procedural and clinical outcomes of Sapien XT and Sapien 3 valves in transcatheter aortic valve replacement in Korean patients. Korean Circ J. 2020; 50:907–922.

6. Tummala R, Banerjee K, Sankaramangalam K, et al. Clinical and procedural outcomes with the SAPIEN 3 versus the SAPIEN XT prosthetic valves in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018; 92:E149–E158. PMID: 29068137.

7. Ando T, Briasoulis A, Holmes AA, Taub CC, Takagi H, Afonso L. Sapien 3 versus Sapien XT prosthetic valves in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2016; 220:472–478. PMID: 27390972.

8. Abdelghani M, Mankerious N, Allali A, et al. Bioprosthetic valve performance after transcatheter aortic valve replacement with self-expanding versus balloon-expandable valves in large versus small aortic valve annuli: insights from the CHOICE trial and the CHOICE-Extend registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018; 11:2507–2518. PMID: 30503595.

9. Theron A, Pinto J, Grisoli D, et al. Patient-prosthesis mismatch in new generation trans-catheter heart valves: a propensity score analysis. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018; 19:225–233. PMID: 28329317.

10. Head SJ, Mokhles MM, Osnabrugge RL, et al. The impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival after aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 34 observational studies comprising 27 186 patients with 133 141 patient-years. Eur Heart J. 2012; 33:1518–1529. PMID: 22408037.