Korean J Pain.  2020 Jan;33(1):73-80. 10.3344/kjp.2020.33.1.73.

Radiation exposure to the eyes and thyroid during C-arm fluoroscopy-guided cervical epidural injections is far below the safety limit

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
  • 2Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

Background
The aim of this study was to evaluate radiation exposure to the eye and thyroid in pain physicians during the fluoroscopy-guided cervical epidural block (CEB).
Methods
Two pain physicians (a fellow and a professor) who regularly performed Carm fluoroscopy-guided CEBs were included. Seven dosimeters were used to measure radiation exposure, five of which were placed on the physician (forehead, inside and outside of the thyroid protector, and inside and outside of the lead apron) and two were used as controls. Patient age, sex, height, and weight were noted, as were radiation exposure time, absorbed radiation dose, and distance from the X-ray field center to the physician.
Results
One hundred CEB procedures using C-arm fluoroscopy were performed on comparable patients. Only the distance from the X-ray field center to the physician was significantly different between the two physicians (fellow: 37.5 ± 2.1 cm, professor: 41.2 ± 3.6 cm, P = 0.03). The use of lead-based protection effectively decreased the absorbed radiation dose by up to 35%.
Conclusions
Although there was no difference in radiation exposure between the professor and the fellow, there was a difference in the distance from the X-ray field during the CEBs. Further, radiation exposure can be minimized if proper protection (thyroid protector, leaded apron, and eyewear) is used, even if the distance between the X-ray beam and the pain physician is small. Damage from frequent, low-dose radiation exposure is not yet fully understood. Therefore, safety measures, including lead-based protection, should always be enforced.

Keyword

Anesthesia; Epidural; Cervical Vertebrae; Chronic Pain; Eye; Fluoroscopy; Physicians; Protection; Radiation; Thyroid Gland

Figure

  • Fig. 1 The cervical epidural block (CEB) technique. (A) Lateral view of a pain physician performing a CEB. (B) Anterior view of a pain physician performing a CEB.

  • Fig. 2 Thermoluminescent dosimeters were placed on the forehead (A), outside the thyroid protector (B), inside the thyroid protector (C), inside the apron (D), and outside the apron (E).

  • Fig. 3 Measurement of the distance (A) between the center of the X-ray field (B) and the physician. The distance between the X-ray beam and the physician was measured during imaging after needle manipulation.

  • Fig. 4 Annual equivalent dose (approximately 600 cases) was calculated from 2-month (100 cases) exposure data, as measured using thermoluminescent dosimeters. Annual maximum permissible radiation doses set by the International Commission on Radiological Protection are 500 and 20 mSv for the thyroid and crystalline lens, respectively. In: inside, Out: outside.


Cited by  1 articles

Radiation safety for pain physicians: principles and recommendations
Sewon Park, Minjung Kim, Jae Hun Kim
Korean J Pain. 2022;35(2):129-139.    doi: 10.3344/kjp.2022.35.2.129.


Reference

1. Manchikanti L, Singh V, Hirsch JA. Saga of payment systems of ambulatory surgery centers for interventional techniques: an update. Pain Physician. 2012; 15:109–30. PMID: 22430649.
2. Vera GV, Aleksandra F, Dragan K, Andrija H. Assessment of genome damage in occupational exposure to ionising radiation and ultrasound. Mutat Res. 1997; 395:101–5. PMID: 9465919. DOI: 10.1016/S1383-5718(97)00149-6.
Article
3. Andreassi MG. The biological effects of diagnostic cardiac imaging on chronically exposed physicians: the importance of being non-ionizing. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2004; 2:25. DOI: 10.1186/1476-7120-2-25. PMID: 15555078. PMCID: 538257.
Article
4. Maffei F, Angelini S, Forti GC, Violante FS, Lodi V, Mattioli S, et al. Spectrum of chromosomal aberrations in peripheral lymphocytes of hospital workers occupationally exposed to low doses of ionizing radiation. Mutat Res. 2004; 547:91–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2003.12.003. PMID: 15013703.
Article
5. Krempen JF, Smith BS. Nerve-root injection: a method for evaluating the etiology of sciatica. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974; 56:1435–44. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-197456070-00011. PMID: 4433365.
6. White AH. Injection techniques for the diagnosis and treatment of low back pain. Orthop Clin North Am. 1983; 14:553–67. PMID: 6223258.
Article
7. Bicket MC, Gupta A, Brown CH 4th, Cohen SP. Epidural injections for spinal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the “control” injections in randomized controlled trials. Anesthesiology. 2013; 119:907–31. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31829c2ddd. PMID: 24195874.
8. Candido KD, Knezevic NN. Cervical epidural steroid injections for the treatment of cervical spinal (neck) pain. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2013; 17:314. DOI: 10.1007/s11916-012-0314-7. PMID: 23315021.
Article
9. Bose B. Quadriparesis following cervical epidural steroid injections: case report and review of the literature. Spine J. 2005; 5:558–63. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.03.015. PMID: 16153586.
Article
10. Hodges SD, Castleberg RL, Miller T, Ward R, Thornburg C. Cervical epidural steroid injection with intrinsic spinal cord damage. Two case reports. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998; 23:2137–42. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199810010-00020. PMID: 9794061.
11. Khan S, Pioro EP. Cervical epidural injection complicated by syrinx formation: a case report. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010; 35:E614–6. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cf7621. PMID: 20461029.
12. Nakashima E, Neriishi K, Minamoto A. A reanalysis of atomic-bomb cataract data, 2000–2002: a threshold analysis. Health Phys. 2006; 90:154–60. DOI: 10.1097/01.HP.0000175442.03596.63. PMID: 16404173.
Article
13. Neriishi K, Nakashima E, Minamoto A, Fujiwara S, Akahoshi M, Mishima HK, et al. Postoperative cataract cases among atomic bomb survivors: radiation dose response and threshold. Radiat Res. 2007; 168:404–8. DOI: 10.1667/RR0928.1. PMID: 17903036.
Article
14. Vano E. Radiation exposure to cardiologists: how it could be reduced. Heart. 2003; 89:1123–4. DOI: 10.1136/heart.89.10.1123. PMID: 12975391. PMCID: 1767905.
Article
15. Ciraj-Bjelac O, Rehani MM, Sim KH, Liew HB, Vano E, Kleiman NJ. Risk for radiation-induced cataract for staff in interventional cardiology: is there reason for concern? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010; 76:826–34. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.22670. PMID: 20549683.
Article
16. Vano E, Kleiman NJ, Duran A, Rehani MM, Echeverri D, Cabrera M. Radiation cataract risk in interventional cardiology personnel. Radiat Res. 2010; 174:490–5. DOI: 10.1667/RR2207.1. PMID: 20726724.
Article
17. Chodick G, Bekiroglu N, Hauptmann M, Alexander BH, Freedman DM, Doody MM, et al. Risk of cataract after exposure to low doses of ionizing radiation: a 20-year prospective cohort study among US radiologic technologists. Am J Epidemiol. 2008; 168:620–31. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwn171. PMID: 18664497. PMCID: 2727195.
Article
18. Rehani MM, Vano E, Ciraj-Bjelac O, Kleiman NJ. Radiation and cataract. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2011; 147:300–4. DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncr299. PMID: 21764807.
Article
19. Stewart FA, Akleyev AV, Hauer-Jensen M, Hendry JH, Kleiman NJ, Macvittie TJ, et al. ICRP publication 118: ICRP statement on tissue reactions and early and late effects of radiation in normal tissues and organs--threshold doses for tissue reactions in a radiation protection context. Ann ICRP. 2012; 41:1–322. DOI: 10.1016/j.icrp.2012.02.001. PMID: 22925378.
Article
20. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007; 37:1–332. PMID: 18082557. DOI: 10.1016/j.icrp.2007.10.003.
21. Manchikanti L, Cash KA, Moss TL, Pampati V. Radiation exposure to the physician in interventional pain management. Pain Physician. 2002; 5:385–93. PMID: 16886017.
Article
22. Jung CH, Ryu JS, Baek SW, Oh JH, Woo NS, Kim HK, et al. Radiation exposure of the hand and chest during C-arm fluoroscopy-guided procedures. Korean J Pain. 2013; 26:51–6. DOI: 10.3344/kjp.2013.26.1.51. PMID: 23342208. PMCID: 3546211.
Article
23. Botwin KP, Freeman ED, Gruber RD, Torres-Rames FM, Bouchtas CG, Sanelli JT, et al. Radiation exposure to the physician performing fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural steroid injections. Pain Physician. 2001; 4:343–8. PMID: 16902680.
24. Botwin KP, Fuoco GS, Torres FM, Gruber RD, Bouchlas CC, Castellanos R, et al. Radiation exposure to the spinal interventionalist performing lumbar discography. Pain Physician. 2003; 6:295–300. PMID: 16880875.
25. Botwin KP, Thomas S, Gruber RD, Torres FM, Bouchlas CC, Rittenberg JJ, et al. Radiation exposure of the spinal interventionalist performing fluoroscopically guided lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002; 83:697–701. DOI: 10.1053/apmr.2002.32439. PMID: 11994810.
Article
26. Politi L, Biondi-Zoccai G, Nocetti L, Costi T, Monopoli D, Rossi R, et al. Reduction of scatter radiation during transradial percutaneous coronary angiography: a randomized trial using a lead-free radiation shield. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012; 79:97–102. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.22947. PMID: 21520391.
Article
27. Paulson EK, Sheafor DH, Enterline DS, McAdams HP, Yoshizumi TT. CT fluoroscopy--guided interventional procedures: techniques and radiation dose to radiologists. Radiology. 2001; 220:161–7. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.220.1.r01jl29161. PMID: 11425990.
Article
28. Singer G. Occupational radiation exposure to the surgeon. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005; 13:69–76. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200501000-00009. PMID: 15712984.
Article
29. Richman AH, Chan B, Katz M. Effectiveness of lead lenses in reducing radiation exposure. Radiology. 1976; 121:357–9. DOI: 10.1148/121.2.357. PMID: 981613.
Article
30. Oyar O, Kışlalıoğlu A. How protective are the lead aprons we use against ionizing radiation? Diagn Interv Radiol. 2012; 18:147–52. DOI: 10.4261/1305-3825.DIR.4526-11.1. PMID: 22020951.
Article
31. Bordoli SJ, Carsten CG 3rd, Cull DL, Johnson BL, Taylor SM. Radiation safety education in vascular surgery training. J Vasc Surg. 2014; 59:860–4. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.10.085. PMID: 24360583.
Article
32. Friedman AA, Ghani KR, Peabody JO, Jackson A, Trinh QD, Elder JS. Radiation safety knowledge and practices among urology residents and fellows: results of a nationwide survey. J Surg Educ. 2013; 70:224–31. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2012.10.002. PMID: 23427968.
Article
33. Cheon BK, Kim CL, Kim KR, Kang MH, Lim JA, Woo NS, et al. Radiation safety: a focus on lead aprons and thyroid shields in interventional pain management. Korean J Pain. 2018; 31:244–52. DOI: 10.3344/kjp.2018.31.4.244. PMID: 30310549. PMCID: 6177538.
Article
34. Park PE, Park JM, Kang JE, Cho JH, Cho SJ, Kim JH, et al. Radiation safety and education in the applicants of the final test for the expert of pain medicine. Korean J Pain. 2012; 25:16–21. DOI: 10.3344/kjp.2012.25.1.16. PMID: 22259711. PMCID: 3259132.
Article
35. Zhou Y, Singh N, Abdi S, Wu J, Crawford J, Furgang FA. Fluoroscopy radiation safety for spine interventional pain procedures in university teaching hospitals. Pain Physician. 2005; 8:49–53. PMID: 16850042.
36. Cousin AJ, Lawdahl RB, Chakraborty DP, Koehler RE. The case for radioprotective eyewear/facewear. Practical implications and suggestions. Invest Radiol. 1987; 22:688–92. DOI: 10.1097/00004424-198708000-00012. PMID: 3667176.
Full Text Links
  • KJP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr