J Korean Med Sci.  2020 Aug;35(31):e251. 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e251.

Results of a Government-supported Newborn Hearing Screening Pilot Project in the 17 Cities and Provinces from 2014 to 2018 in Korea

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Dongguk University Gyeongju Hospital, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Gyeongju, Korea
  • 2Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 3Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

Background
The aim of this study was to present and analyze, for the first time, the results of a government-supported nationwide newborn hearing screening (NHS) pilot project in the 17 major cities and provinces of Korea.
Methods
We analyzed a nationwide NHS database of 344,955 newborns in the pilot project from 2014 to 2018. The government supported the cost of one NHS and one diagnostic auditory brainstem response (ABR) test. Hearing loss (HL) was defined as ≥ 40 dB nHL on either side of the ABR threshold test.
Results
Most NHS tests were performed in the maternity clinics (91.5%). In regions with lack of maternity clinics, the screening rate of local clinics was high (Jeju: 31.1% and Sejong: 12.9%). In most regions, automated ABR was mainly used for screening test (89.7%), but Gangwon (32.7%), Jeju (31.0%), and Jeonbuk (29.6%) performed more NHS tests using (automated) otoacoustic emissions than other regions. The mean referral rate was 1.5%, but the overall diagnostic ABR rate was low at 18.5%. The referral rates of Busan (0.6%) and Gyeongnam (0.9%) were lower than 1%, and Jeju's referral rate was 7.3%. Prevalence of HL including unilateral HL was 0.12%.
Conclusion
Depending on the cities and provinces, there were significant differences in the screening rates and referral rates by hospital type and NHS method. For successful early hearing detection and intervention (EHDI) and quality control, it will be necessary to support and manage EHDI according to regional NHS's characteristics and ensure that the whole country conducts EHDI as standard.

Keyword

Newborn Hearing Screening; Auditory Brainstem Response; Hearing Loss; Provinces; Government

Cited by  1 articles

Parental Awareness of the National Support Policy for Outpatient Clinic Newborn Hearing Screening in South Korea
Jisu Kim, Su-Kyoung Park, Kyu Young Choi, Jiwon Chang
Korean J Otorhinolaryngol-Head Neck Surg. 2023;66(4):248-255.    doi: 10.3342/kjorl-hns.2023.00108.


Reference

1. Nelson HD, Bougatsos C, Nygren P. 2001 US Preventive Services Task Force. Universal newborn hearing screening: systematic review to update the 2001 US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation. Pediatrics. 2008; 122(1):e266–76. PMID: 18595973.
Article
2. Evelyn C. Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. Year 2000 position statement: principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Am J Audiol. 2000; 9(1):9–29.
3. Yoshinaga-Itano C. Principles and guidelines for early intervention after confirmation that a child is deaf or hard of hearing. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2014; 19(2):143–175. PMID: 24131505.
Article
4. American Academy of Pediatrics, Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. Year 2007 position statement: Principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Pediatrics. 2007; 120(4):898–921. PMID: 17908777.
5. Korean Audiological Society. Korean Newborn Hearing Screening Guideline Update. 2nd ed. Seoul, Korea: The Korean Audiological Society;2018.
6. Yoshinaga-Itano C, Sedey AL, Coulter DK, Mehl AL. Language of early- and later-identified children with hearing loss. Pediatrics. 1998; 102(5):1161–1171. PMID: 9794949.
Article
7. Lomber SG, Meredith MA, Kral A. Cross-modal plasticity in specific auditory cortices underlies visual compensations in the deaf. Nat Neurosci. 2010; 13(11):1421–1427. PMID: 20935644.
Article
8. World Health Organization (WHO). Newborn and Infant Hearing Screening: Current Issues and Guiding Principles for Action. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization;2010.
9. Vos B, Senterre C, Lagasse R, Tognola G, Levêque A. Organisation of newborn hearing screening programmes in the European Union: widely implemented, differently performed. Eur J Public Health. 2016; 26(3):505–510. PMID: 27009037.
Article
10. Mehl AL, Thomson V. Newborn hearing screening: the great omission. Pediatrics. 1998; 101(1):E4.
Article
11. Chung YS, Oh SH, Park SK. Referral rates for newborn hearing screening based on the test time. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019; 127:109664. PMID: 31521889.
Article
12. Korea Statistics. Income distribution index. Accessed March 13, 2020. http://kostat.go.kr/incomeNcpi/income/income_dg/4/4/index.static.
13. Ministry of Health and Welfare. Maternal and Child Health Project Guide. Sejong, Korea: Ministry of Health and Welfare;2017. p. 273–327.
14. KOrean Statistical Information Service (KOSIS). National live births. Accessed March 1, 2020. http://kosis.kr/search/search.do.
15. KOrean Statistical Information Service (KOSIS). Vital Statistics. Updated March 10, 2020. Accessed March 3, 2020. https://kosis.kr/eng/search/searchList.do;jsessionid=HD6OPyDXdoO9MZVm4dflNzBMIqjaTnmZoQmjpB1Rxutqy71q4zlLaPU62TYw0MLs.STAT_SIGA2_servlet_engine2.
16. KOrean Statistical Information Service (KOSIS). Clinic status by region and subject. Updated February 6, 2020. Accessed March 15, 2020. http://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=354&tblId=DT_HIRA4G.
17. Washington State Department of Health. Protocol for Newborn Hearing Screening. Updated 2017. Accessed March 15, 2020. https://www.infanthearing.org/stateguidelines/Washington/Screening%20Guidelines.pdf.
18. Tennessee Department of Health. Newborn hearing screening guidelines for hospitals and birthing centers. Updated 2009. Accessed 15 March, 2020. http://www.infanthearing.org/stateguidelines/Tennessee/Screening%20Guidelines.pdf.
19. Li PC, Chen WI, Huang CM, Liu CJ, Chang HW, Lin HC. Comparison of newborn hearing screening in well-baby nursery and NICU: a study applied to reduce referral rate in NICU. PLoS One. 2016; 11(3):e0152028. PMID: 27023324.
Article
20. Butcher E, Dezateux C, Cortina-Borja M, Knowles RL. Prevalence of permanent childhood hearing loss detected at the universal newborn hearing screen: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2019; 14(7):e0219600. PMID: 31295316.
Article
21. National Center for Hearing Assessment and Management (NCHAM). Chapter 3. Tracking, reporting, & follow-up. Updated 2020. Accessed March 1, 2020. http://infanthearing.org/ehdi-ebook/2020_ebook/3%20Chapter3Tracking2020.pdf.
22. Public Health England. NHS newborn hearing screening programme (NHSP). Accessed March 2, 2020. https://www.gov.uk/topic/population-screening-programmes/newborn-hearing.
23. van Wieringen A, Boudewyns A, Sangen A, Wouters J, Desloovere C. Unilateral congenital hearing loss in children: challenges and potentials. Hear Res. 2019; 372:29–41. PMID: 29395617.
Article
24. Iwasaki S, Hayashi Y, Seki A, Nagura M, Hashimoto Y, Oshima G, et al. A model of two-stage newborn hearing screening with automated auditory brainstem response. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2003; 67(10):1099–1104. PMID: 14550964.
Article
25. Lin HC, Shu MT, Lee KS, Ho GM, Fu TY, Bruna S, et al. Comparison of hearing screening programs between one step with transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and two steps with TEOAE and automated auditory brainstem response. Laryngoscope. 2005; 115(11):1957–1962. PMID: 16319605.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr