J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg.  2020 Jun;46(3):174-182. 10.5125/jkaoms.2020.46.3.174.

Efficacy of arthrocentesis and lavage for treatment of post-traumatic arthritis in temporomandibular joints

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Seoul National University Dental Hospital, Korea
  • 2Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Korea
  • 3Clinical Translational Research Center for Dental Science, Seoul National University Dental Hospital, Korea
  • 4Oral Cancer Center, Seoul National University Dental Hospital, Seoul, Korea

Abstract


Objectives
Joint injuries frequently lead to progressive joint degeneration that causes articular disc derangement, joint inflammation, and osteoarthritis. Such arthropathies that arise after trauma are defined as post-traumatic arthritis (PTA). Although PTA is well recognized in knee and elbow joints, PTA in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) has not been clearly defined. Interestingly, patients experiencing head and neck trauma without direct jaw fracture have displayed TMJ disease symptoms; however, definitive diagnosis and treatment options are not available. This study will analyze clinical aspects of PTA in TMJ and their treatment outcomes after joint arthrocentesis and lavage.
Materials and Methods
Twenty patients with history of trauma to the head and neck especially without jaw fracture were retrospectively studied. Those patients developed TMJ disease symptoms and were diagnosed by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. To decrease TMJ discomfort, arthrocentesis and lavage with or without conservative therapy were applied, and efficacy was evaluated by amount of mouth opening and pain scale. Statistical differences between pre- and post-treatment values were evaluated by Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
Results
Patient age varied widely between 20 and 80 years, and causes of trauma were diverse. Duration of disease onset was measured as 508 posttrauma days, and 85% of the patients sought clinic visit within 2 years after trauma. In addition, 85% of the patients showed TMJ disc derangement without reduction, and osteoarthritis was accompanied at the traumatized side or at both sides in 40% of the patients. After arthrocentesis or lavage, maximal mouth opening was significantly increased (28-44 mm on average, P<0.001) and pain scale was dramatically decreased (7.8-3.5 of 10, P<0.001); however, concomitant conservative therapy showed no difference in treatment outcome.
Conclusion
The results of this study clarify the disease identity of PTA in TMJ and suggest early diagnosis and treatment options to manage PTA in TMJ.

Keyword

Temporomandibular joint disc; Synovial fluid; Joint diseases; Post-traumatic headache; Osteoarthritis

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Clinical aspects of post-traumatic arthritis in temporomandibular joint. A. Age distribution of the 20 patients. Mean age was 48.7 years (thick bar in the middle) with standard error of 4.6 years (left panel). The age distribution passed the normality test (α>0.05) by the one-sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov test (P>0.1), and the normal distribution is shown in a QQ plot on the right panel. B. Sex distribution of the patients (male=9, female=11). C. The causes of trauma of the 20 patients were diverse, as comprising traffic accident (n=6), assault (n=3), hit by materials (n=3), and fall down (n=8).

  • Fig. 2 Onset of post-traumatic arthritis (PTA) in temporomandibular joint (TMJ). A. When a PTA patient reports to a clinic with TMJ discomfort, the time since initial trauma should be measured. Days after trauma was calculated as the duration between initial trauma and the patient’s first visit to the clinic and is was marked with a triangle in the bar graph. The average “days after trauma” was 508 days, with a standard error of 112 days. B. The bar graphs show the number of PTA patients reporting to the TMJ clinic during the 1st (n=8), 2nd (n=9), or 3rd (n=3) year after initial trauma. In total, 85.0% of the patients (17 of 20) sought help within 2 years after trauma.

  • Fig. 3 Diagnosis of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) arthritis in post-traumatic arthritis patients by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). TMJ MRI showed TMJ disc derangement without reduction (DD w/o reduction) in 85% of the patients (17 of 20), 5 of whom showed derangement at both sides. Eight patients suffered degenerative joint disease (DJD) such as osteoarthritis at the traumatized side of the TMJ, 2 of which had osteoarthritis at both sides. Only 2 patients were diagnosed with disc derangement with reduction (DD w/ reduction).

  • Fig. 4 Treatment efficacy of temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis and lavage in post-traumatic arthritis patients. A. All patients received joint arthrocentesis or lavage with (n=8) or without (n=12) conservative therapy. B. After arthrocentesis or lavage, improvement of maximal mouth opening (MMO) was statistically significant (28-44 mm in average, ***P<0.001, left panel). The dot plot shows amount of MMO at pre- or post-treatment visit. Thick black bar shows the average and standard error of 20 patients. Pre- and post-lavage MMOs in the same patient were connected as paired data (right panel). C. Pain scale was dramatically reduced from 7.8 to 3.5 of 10 (***P<0.001). The dot plot shows the pain scale at pre- or post-treatment visit. Thick black bar shows average and standard error of 20 patients. The pain scales at pre- and post-lavage in the same patient were connected as paired data (right panel). Differences in treatment outcomes before and after treatments were assessed using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. All reported P-values were based on two-sided tests, and statistical significance was shown as ***P<0.001.

  • Fig. 5 Recommended treatment protocol for post-traumatic arthritis in temporomandibular joint. A. Maximal mouth opening (MMO, mm) over treatment days, where day “0” is the first visit at the clinic. The red dotted line represents 40 mm of mouth opening. B. MMO over treatment numbers. The x-axis is the number of patients’ visits. The red dotted line represents 40 mm of mouth opening. Each dot represents one patient’s visit and each identical figure represents one patient. C. Comparison of pre- and post-treatment MMO (left panel) and pain scale (right panel) between the two groups: lavage only group versus lavage with concomitant conservative therapy group. Bar graphs show average changes in MMO with standard errors. Changes in MMO and pain scales were compared between the two groups by Mann–Whitney test. (NS: not significant)


Reference

References

1. Ahmad M, Schiffman EL. 2016; Temporomandibular joint disorders and orofacial pain. Dent Clin North Am. 60:105–24. DOI: 10.1016/j.cden.2015.08.004. PMID: 26614951. PMCID: PMC6762033.
Article
2. Roberts WE, Stocum DL. 2018; Part II: temporomandibular joint (TMJ)-regeneration, degeneration, and adaptation. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 16:369–79. DOI: 10.1007/s11914-018-0462-8. PMID: 29943316.
Article
3. Stocum DL, Roberts WE. 2018; Part I: development and physiology of the temporomandibular joint. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 16:360–8. DOI: 10.1007/s11914-018-0447-7. PMID: 29948821.
Article
4. Barkin S, Weinberg S. 2000; Internal derangements of the temporomandibular joint: the role of arthroscopic surgery and arthrocentesis. J Can Dent Assoc. 66:199–203.
5. Chisnoiu AM, Picos AM, Popa S, Chisnoiu PD, Lascu L, Picos A, et al. 2015; Factors involved in the etiology of temporomandibular disorders - a literature review. Clujul Med. 88:473–8. DOI: 10.15386/cjmed-485. PMID: 26732121. PMCID: PMC4689239.
Article
6. Dolwick MF. 2007; Temporomandibular joint surgery for internal derangement. Dent Clin North Am. 51:195–208. vii-viii. DOI: 10.1016/j.cden.2006.10.003. PMID: 17185066.
Article
7. Krishnan DG. 2017; Soft tissue trauma in the temporomandibular joint region associated with condylar fractures. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 25:63–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.cxom.2016.11.002. PMID: 28153184.
Article
8. Renapurkar SK, Strauss RA. 2019; Temporomandibular joint trauma. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 27:99–106. DOI: 10.1016/j.cxom.2019.05.001. PMID: 31345496.
Article
9. Salé H, Isberg A. 2007; Delayed temporomandibular joint pain and dysfunction induced by whiplash trauma: a controlled prospective study. J Am Dent Assoc. 138:1084–91. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2007.0320. PMID: 17670875.
10. Takahashi T, Ohtani M, Sano T, Ohnuki T, Kondoh T, Fukuda M. 2004; Magnetic resonance evidence of joint effusion of the temporomandibular joint after fractures of the mandibular condyle: a preliminary report. Cranio. 22:124–31. DOI: 10.1179/crn.2004.016. PMID: 15134412.
Article
11. Tripathi R, Sharma N, Dwivedi AN, Kumar S. 2015; Severity of soft tissue injury within the temporomandibular joint following condylar fracture as seen on magnetic resonance imaging and its impact on outcome of functional management. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 73:2379. e1-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.09.003. PMID: 26428614.
Article
12. Yun PY, Kim YK. 2005; The role of facial trauma as a possible etiologic factor in temporomandibular joint disorder. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 63:1576–83. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.05.318. PMID: 16243173.
Article
13. Lieberthal J, Sambamurthy N, Scanzello CR. 2015; Inflammation in joint injury and post-traumatic osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 23:1825–34. DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2015.08.015. PMID: 26521728. PMCID: PMC4630675.
Article
14. Punzi L, Galozzi P, Luisetto R, Favero M, Ramonda R, Oliviero F, et al. 2016; Post-traumatic arthritis: overview on pathogenic mechanisms and role of inflammation. RMD Open. 2:e000279. DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2016-000279. PMID: 27651925. PMCID: PMC5013366.
Article
15. Englund M, Guermazi A, Lohmander LS. 2009; The meniscus in knee osteoarthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 35:579–90. DOI: 10.1016/j.rdc.2009.08.004. PMID: 19931804.
Article
16. Gelber AC, Hochberg MC, Mead LA, Wang NY, Wigley FM, Klag MJ. 2000; Joint injury in young adults and risk for subsequent knee and hip osteoarthritis. Ann Intern Med. 133:321–8. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-133-5-200009050-00007. PMID: 10979876.
Article
17. Teunis T, Beekhuizen M, Van Osch GV, Schuurman AH, Creemers LB, van Minnen LP. 2014; Soluble mediators in posttraumatic wrist and primary knee osteoarthritis. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2:146–50. PMID: 25386573. PMCID: PMC4225017.
18. Barton KI, Shekarforoush M, Heard BJ, Sevick JL, Vakil P, Atarod M, et al. 2017; Use of pre-clinical surgically induced models to understand biomechanical and biological consequences of PTOA development. J Orthop Res. 35:454–65. DOI: 10.1002/jor.23322. PMID: 27256202.
Article
19. Olson SA, Horne P, Furman B, Huebner J, Al-Rashid M, Kraus VB, et al. 2014; The role of cytokines in posttraumatic arthritis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 22:29–37. DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-22-01-29. PMID: 24382877.
Article
20. Shen PC, Wu CL, Jou IM, Lee CH, Juan HY, Lee PJ, et al. 2011; T helper cells promote disease progression of osteoarthritis by inducing macrophage inflammatory protein-1γ. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 19:728–36. DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2011.02.014. PMID: 21376128.
Article
21. Takebe K, Rai MF, Schmidt EJ, Sandell LJ. 2015; The chemokine receptor CCR5 plays a role in post-traumatic cartilage loss in mice, but does not affect synovium and bone. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 23:454–61. DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.12.002. PMID: 25498590. PMCID: PMC4341917.
Article
22. Teunis T, Beekhuizen M, Kon M, Creemers LB, Schuurman AH, van Minnen LP. 2013; Inflammatory mediators in posttraumatic radiocarpal osteoarthritis. J Hand Surg Am. 38:1735–40. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.06.023. PMID: 23932814.
Article
23. van Meegeren ME, Roosendaal G, Jansen NW, Wenting MJ, van Wesel AC, van Roon JA, et al. 2012; IL-4 alone and in combination with IL-10 protects against blood-induced cartilage damage. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 20:764–72. DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.04.002. PMID: 22503813.
Article
24. Anderson DD, Chubinskaya S, Guilak F, Martin JA, Oegema TR, Olson SA, et al. 2011; Post-traumatic osteoarthritis: improved understanding and opportunities for early intervention. J Orthop Res. 29:802–9. DOI: 10.1002/jor.21359. PMID: 21520254. PMCID: PMC3082940.
Article
25. Caron JP, Fernandes JC, Martel-Pelletier J, Tardif G, Mineau F, Geng C, et al. 1996; Chondroprotective effect of intraarticular injections of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist in experimental osteoarthritis. Suppression of collagenase-1 expression. Arthritis Rheum. 39:1535–44. DOI: 10.1002/art.1780390914. PMID: 8814066.
Article
26. Goodrich LR, Phillips JN, McIlwraith CW, Foti SB, Grieger JC, Gray SJ, et al. 2013; Optimization of scAAVIL-1ra in vitro and in vivo to deliver high levels of therapeutic protein for treatment of osteoarthritis. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2:e70. DOI: 10.1038/mtna.2012.61. PMID: 23385523. PMCID: PMC3586798.
Article
27. Fischer DJ, Mueller BA, Critchlow CW, LeResche L. 2006; The association of temporomandibular disorder pain with history of head and neck injury in adolescents. J Orofac Pain. 20:191–8. PMID: 16913428.
28. Häggman-Henrikson B, Rezvani M, List T. 2014; Prevalence of whiplash trauma in TMD patients: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil. 41:59–68. DOI: 10.1111/joor.12123. PMID: 24443899.
Article
29. Kim YK. 1997; Traumatic TMJ injury. J Korean Assoc Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 19:191–9.
30. Klobas L, Tegelberg A, Axelsson S. 2004; Symptoms and signs of temporomandibular disorders in individuals with chronic whiplash-associated disorders. Swed Dent J. 28:29–36. PMID: 15129603.
31. Packard RC. 2002; The relationship of neck injury and post-traumatic headache. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 6:301–7. DOI: 10.1007/s11916-002-0051-4. PMID: 12095465.
Article
32. Dimitroulis G, Dolwick MF, Martinez A. 1995; Temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis and lavage for the treatment of closed lock: a follow-up study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 33:23–6. discussion 26-7. DOI: 10.1016/0266-4356(95)90081-0.
Article
33. Bueno CH, Pereira DD, Pattussi MP, Grossi PK, Grossi ML. 2018; Gender differences in temporomandibular disorders in adult populational studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Rehabil. 45:720–9. DOI: 10.1111/joor.12661. PMID: 29851110.
Article
34. García-Guerrero I, Ramírez JM, Martínez-González JM, Gómez de Diego R, Poblador MS, Lancho JL. 2018; Complications in the treatment of mandibular condylar fractures: Surgical versus conservative treatment. Ann Anat. 216:60–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2017.10.007. PMID: 29223659.
Article
35. Pullinger AG, Seligman DA. 1991; Trauma history in diagnostic groups of temporomandibular disorders. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 71:529–34. DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(91)90355-G. PMID: 2047090.
Article
36. Tabrizi R, Bahramnejad E, Mohaghegh M, Alipour S. 2014; Is the frequency of temporomandibular dysfunction different in various mandibular fractures? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 72:755–61. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.10.018. PMID: 24342579.
Article
37. Howard RP, Hatsell CP, Guzman HM. 1995; Temporomandibular joint injury potential imposed by the low-velocity extension-flexion maneuver. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 53:256–62. discussion 263. DOI: 10.1016/0278-2391(95)90220-1.
Article
38. Brown TD, Johnston RC, Saltzman CL, Marsh JL, Buckwalter JA. 2006; Posttraumatic osteoarthritis: a first estimate of incidence, prevalence, and burden of disease. J Orthop Trauma. 20:739–44. DOI: 10.1097/01.bot.0000246468.80635.ef. PMID: 17106388.
Article
39. Kramer WC, Hendricks KJ, Wang J. 2011; Pathogenetic mechanisms of posttraumatic osteoarthritis: opportunities for early intervention. Int J Clin Exp Med. 4:285–98. PMID: 22140600. PMCID: PMC3228584.
40. Honorati MC, Bovara M, Cattini L, Piacentini A, Facchini A. 2002; Contribution of interleukin 17 to human cartilage degradation and synovial inflammation in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 10:799–807. DOI: 10.1053/joca.2002.0829. PMID: 12359166.
Article
41. Bondeson J, Blom AB, Wainwright S, Hughes C, Caterson B, van den Berg WB. 2010; The role of synovial macrophages and macrophage-produced mediators in driving inflammatory and destructive responses in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 62:647–57. DOI: 10.1002/art.27290. PMID: 20187160.
Article
42. Culemann S, Grüneboom A, Nicolás-Ávila JÁ, Weidner D, Lämmle KF, Rothe T, et al. 2019; Locally renewing resident synovial macrophages provide a protective barrier for the joint. Nature. 572:670–5. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1471-1. PMID: 31391580. PMCID: PMC6805223.
Article
43. Tu J, Hong W, Guo Y, Zhang P, Fang Y, Wang X, et al. 2019; Ontogeny of synovial macrophages and the roles of synovial macrophages from different origins in arthritis. Front Immunol. 10:1146. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01146. PMID: 31231364. PMCID: PMC6558408.
Article
44. Tozoglu S, Al-Belasy FA, Dolwick MF. 2011; A review of techniques of lysis and lavage of the TMJ. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 49:302–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2010.03.008. PMID: 20471143.
Article
45. Kopp S, Wenneberg B, Haraldson T, Carlsson GE. 1985; The short-term effect of intra-articular injections of sodium hyaluronate and corticosteroid on temporomandibular joint pain and dysfunction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 43:429–35. DOI: 10.1016/S0278-2391(85)80050-1. PMID: 3858479.
Article
46. Sequeira J, Rao BHS, Kedia PR. 2019; Efficacy of sodium hyaluronate for temporomandibular joint disorder by single-puncture arthrocentesis. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 18:88–92. DOI: 10.1007/s12663-018-1093-4. PMID: 30728698. PMCID: PMC6328828.
Article
47. Bertolami CN, Gay T, Clark GT, Rendell J, Shetty V, Liu C, et al. 1993; Use of sodium hyaluronate in treating temporomandibular joint disorders: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 51:232–42. DOI: 10.1016/S0278-2391(10)80163-6. PMID: 8445463.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKAOMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr