Korean J Pain.  2020 Jul;33(3):275-283. 10.3344/kjp.2020.33.3.275.

Diffusion tensor imaging of the C1-C3 dorsal root ganglia and greater occipital nerve for cervicogenic headache

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Radiology, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
  • 2North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
  • 3Department of Pain, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China

Abstract

Background
Previous studies showed neurography and tractography of the greater occipital nerve (GON). The purpose of this study was determining diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) parameters of bilateral GONs and dorsal root ganglia (DRG) in unilateral cervicogenic headache as well as the grading value of DTI for severe headache. The correlation between DTI parameters and clinical characteristics was evaluated.
Methods
The fractional anisotropy (FA) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in bilateral GONs and cervical DRG (C2 and C3) were measured. Grading values for headache severity was calculated using a receiver operating characteristics curve. The correlation was analyzed with Pearson’s coefficient.
Results
The FA values of the symptomatic side of GON and cervical DRG (C2 and C3) were significantly lower than that of the asymptomatic side (all the P < 0.001), while the ADC values were significantly higher (P = 0.003, P < 0.001, and P = 0.003, respectively). The FA value of 0.205 in C2 DRG was considered the grading parameter for headache severity with sensitivity of 0.743 and specificity of 0.999 (P < 0.001). A negative correlation and a positive correlation between the FA and ADC value of the GON and headache index (HI; r = –0.420, P = 0.037 and r = 0.531, P = 0.006, respectively) was found.
Conclusions
DTI parameters in the symptomatic side of the C2 and C3 DRG and GON were significantly changed. The FA value of the C2 DRG can grade headache severity. DTI parameters of the GON significantly correlated with HI.

Keyword

Cervical Vertebrae; Chronic Pain; Diffusion Tensor Imaging; Ganglia, Spinal; Headache; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; ROC Curve; Sensitivity and Specificity

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Multi-slice reconstruction on T2-weighted imaging CUBE showed the greater occipital nerve (GON) and muscles around. We firstly found the oblique capitis inferior muscle (white triangle) and its proximal inferior border (arrow). Then we recognized the proximal GON (arrowhead) as the target nerve for subsequent post-processing step.

  • Fig. 2 Axial image showed the superimposed morphological T1-weighted imaging of right C3 dorsal root ganglia (DRG) (A) and left greater occipital nerve (GON) (B) with region of interest placement. The DRG was identified by directly visualization on original image (b = 0) and the target GON was identified with the help of aforementioned multi-slice reconstruction.

  • Fig. 3 Fibre tractography showed the right greater occipital nerve (arrowheads) was thicker and disordered than the left (arrows) in a 48-year-old male with right cervicogenic headache for 1 month.

  • Fig. 4 A tractography of a 24-year-old male healthy volunteer showed the fibre tract of bilateral side greater occipital nerves (GONs). The fibre tract of normal GON showed continuous, smooth and clearly visualization of all the segments (arrows).

  • Fig. 5 A diagram about the enrollment of the patients. CGH: cervicogenic headache, CHISG: Cervicogenic Headache International Study Group, MRI: magnetic resonance imaging, GON: greater occipital nerve.

  • Fig. 6 Graphs showed receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves analysis of (A) fractional anisotropy and (B) apparent diffusion coefficient values, respectively. DRG: dorsal root ganglia, GON: greater occipital nerve.

  • Fig. 7 Graphs showed the correlation between diffusion tensor imaging parameters of the nerves and HI. The fractional anisotropy (FA) value in proximal greater occipital nerve (GON) was negatively correlated with headache index (HI) (A), r = –0.420, P = 0.037. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value was positively correlated with HI (B), r = 0.531, P = 0.006.


Cited by  1 articles

Receiver operating characteristic curve: overview and practical use for clinicians
Francis Sahngun Nahm
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2022;75(1):25-36.    doi: 10.4097/kja.21209.


Reference

1. Yao X, Lin X. 2016; [Warming-needle moxibustion for cervical headache: a randomized controlled trial]. Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 36:463–6. Chinese. PMID: 27509601.
2. Wang E, Wang D. 2014; Treatment of cervicogenic headache with cervical epidural steroid injection. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 18:442. DOI: 10.1007/s11916-014-0442-3. PMID: 25091129. PMCID: PMC4148620.
Article
3. Pingree MJ, Sole JS, O’Brien TG, Eldrige JS, Moeschler SM. 2017; Clinical efficacy of an ultrasound-guided greater occipital nerve block at the level of C2. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 42:99–104. DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000513. PMID: 27811528.
Article
4. Zipfel J, Kastler A, Tatu L, Behr J, Kechidi R, Kastler B. 2016; Ultrasound-guided intermediate site greater occipital nerve infiltration: a technical feasibility study. Pain Physician. 19:E1027–34.
5. Sapunar D, Kostic S, Banozic A, Puljak L. 2012; Dorsal root ganglion - a potential new therapeutic target for neuropathic pain. J Pain Res. 5:31–8. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S26603. PMID: 22375099. PMCID: PMC3287412.
6. Lee SY, Jang DI, Noh C, Ko YK. 2015; Successful treatment of occipital radiating headache using pulsed radiofrequency therapy. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 58:89–92. DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2015.58.1.89. PMID: 26279821. PMCID: PMC4534747.
Article
7. Bovaira M, Peñarrocha M, Peñarrocha M, Calvo A, Jiménez A, March R. 2013; Radiofrequency treatment of cervicogenic headache. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 18:e293–7. DOI: 10.4317/medoral.17384. PMID: 23229235. PMCID: PMC3613883.
Article
8. Gabrhelík T, Michálek P, Adamus M. 2011; Pulsed radiofrequency therapy versus greater occipital nerve block in the management of refractory cervicogenic headache - a pilot study. Prague Med Rep. 112:279–87. DOI: 10.1016/S1754-3207(11)70669-1.
9. Sjaastad O, Fredriksen TA, Pfaffenrath V. 1998; Cervicogenic headache: diagnostic criteria. The Cervicogenic Headache International Study Group. Headache. 38:442–5. DOI: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.1998.3806442.x. PMID: 9664748.
10. Brienza M, Pujia F, Colaiacomo MC, Anastasio MG, Pierelli F, Di Biasi C, et al. 2014; 3T diffusion tensor imaging and electroneurography of peripheral nerve: a morphofunctional analysis in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Neuroradiol. 41:124–30. DOI: 10.1016/j.neurad.2013.06.001. PMID: 23870213.
Article
11. Naraghi A, da Gama Lobo L, Menezes R, Khanna M, Sussman M, Anastakis D, et al. 2013; Diffusion tensor imaging of the median nerve before and after carpal tunnel release in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: feasibility study. Skeletal Radiol. 42:1403–12. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-013-1670-z. PMID: 23842572.
Article
12. Wang H, Ma J, Zhao L, Wang Y, Jia X. 2016; Utility of MRI diffusion tensor imaging in carpal tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis. Med Sci Monit. 22:736–42. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.895758. PMID: 26942911. PMCID: PMC4784544.
Article
13. Kastler A, Attye A, Heck O, Tahon F, Boubagra K, Tropes I, et al. 2018; Greater occipital nerve MR tractography: feasibility and anatomical considerations. J Neuroradiol. 45:54–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.neurad.2017.09.001. PMID: 28964923.
Article
14. Wang L, Das S, Yang H. 2019; DTI of great occipital nerve neuropathy: an initial study in patients with cervicogenic headache. Clin Radiol. 74:899.e1–899.e6. DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.07.025. PMID: 31495544.
Article
15. Sjaastad O, Saunte C, Hovdahl H, Breivik H, Gr©ªnbaek E. 1983; “Cervicogenic” headache. An hypothesis. Cephalalgia. 3:249–56. DOI: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1983.0304249.x. PMID: 6640659.
Article
16. Dilli E, Halker R, Vargas B, Hentz J, Radam T, Rogers R, et al. 2015; Occipital nerve block for the short-term preventive treatment of migraine: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Cephalalgia. 35:959–68. DOI: 10.1177/0333102414561872. PMID: 25505035.
Article
17. Määttä JH, Karppinen J, Paananen M, Bow C, Luk KD, Cheung KM, et al. 2016; Refined phenotyping of Modic changes: imaging biomarkers of prolonged severe low back pain and disability. Medicine (Baltimore). 95:e3495. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003495. PMID: 27258491. PMCID: PMC4900699.
18. Cesmebasi A, Muhleman MA, Hulsberg P, Gielecki J, Matusz P, Tubbs RS, et al. 2015; Occipital neuralgia: anatomic considerations. Clin Anat. 28:101–8. DOI: 10.1002/ca.22468. PMID: 25244129.
Article
19. Das SK, Yang DJ, Wang JL, Zhang C, Yang HF. 2017; Non-Gaussian diffusion imaging for malignant and benign pulmonary nodule differentiation: a preliminary study. Acta Radiol. 58:19–26. DOI: 10.1177/0284185116639763. PMID: 27055919.
Article
20. Headache Classification Subcommittee of the International Headache Society. 2004; The International Classification of Headache Disorders: 2nd edition. Cephalalgia. 24(Suppl 1):9–160. DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(03)00590-8. PMID: 14979299.
21. Chua NH, Vissers KC, Sluijter ME. 2011; Pulsed radiofrequency treatment in interventional pain management: mechanisms and potential indications-a review. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 153:763–71. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-010-0881-5. PMID: 21116663. PMCID: PMC3059755.
Article
22. Denton TR, Shields LBE, Howe JN, Shanks TS, Spalding AC. 2017; Practical considerations of linear accelerator-based frameless extracranial radiosurgery for treatment of occipital neuralgia for nonsurgical candidates. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 18:123–32. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12105. PMID: 28517492. PMCID: PMC5874950.
Article
23. Zhang J, Zhang F, Xiao F, Xiong Z, Liu D, Hua T, et al. 2018; Quantitative evaluation of the compressed L5 and S1 nerve roots in unilateral lumbar disc herniation by using diffusion tensor imaging. Clin Neuroradiol. 28:529–37. DOI: 10.1007/s00062-017-0621-9. PMID: 28828579.
Article
24. Chen YY, Lin XF, Zhang F, Zhang X, Hu HJ, Wang DY, et al. 2014; Diffusion tensor imaging of symptomatic nerve roots in patients with cervical disc herniation. Acad Radiol. 21:338–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2013.11.005. PMID: 24361075.
Article
25. Mehnert MJ, Freedman MK. 2013; Update on the role of z-joint injection and radiofrequency neurotomy for cervicogenic headache. PM R. 5:221–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.01.001. PMID: 23481329.
Article
26. Nair AS, Kodisharapu PK, Anne P, Saifuddin MS, Asiel C, Rayani BK. 2018; Efficacy of bilateral greater occipital nerve block in postdural puncture headache: a narrative review. Korean J Pain. 31:80–6. DOI: 10.3344/kjp.2018.31.2.80. PMID: 29686805. PMCID: PMC5904351.
Article
27. Gandolfi M, Donisi V, Marchioretto F, Battista S, Smania N, Del Piccolo L. 2019; A prospective observational cohort study on pharmacological habitus, headache-related disability and psychological profile in patients with chronic migraine undergoing onabotulinumtoxinA prophylactic treatment. Toxins (Basel). 11:504. DOI: 10.3390/toxins11090504. PMID: 31470654. PMCID: PMC6783872.
Article
28. Hwang L, Dessouky R, Xi Y, Amirlak B, Chhabra A. 2017; MR neurography of greater occipital nerve neuropathy: initial experience in patients with migraine. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 38:2203–9. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5354. PMID: 28882864.
Article
29. Bogduk N, Govind J. 2009; Cervicogenic headache: an assessment of the evidence on clinical diagnosis, invasive tests, and treatment. Lancet Neurol. 8:959–68. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70209-1.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KJP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr