J Educ Eval Health Prof.  2020;17:2. 10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.2.

Changes in the accreditation standards of medical schools by the Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation from 2000 to 2019

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Medical Education, Jeonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea
  • 2Department of Pathology, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 3Department of Emergency Medicine, The Institute of Medical Humanities, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
  • 4Department of Family Medicine, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
  • 5Department of Plastic Surgery, Eulji University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
  • 6Department of Rheumatology, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 7Department of Urology, Institute of Medical Science, Jeju National University School of Medicine, Jeju, Korea
  • 8Department of Medical Education, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea

Abstract

This review presents information on changes in the accreditation standards of medical schools in Korea by the Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation (KIMEE) from 2000 to 2019. Specifically, the following aspects are explained: the development process, setting principles and directions, evaluation items, characteristics of the standards, and validity testing over the course of 4 cycles. The first cycle of accreditation (2000–2005) focused on ensuring the minimum requirements for the educational environment. The evaluation criteria emphasized the core elements of medical education, including facilities and human resources. The second cycle of accreditation (2007–2010) emphasized universities’ commitment to social accountability and the pursuit of excellence in medical education. It raised the importance of qualitative standards for judging the content and quality of education. In the post-second accreditation cycle (2012–2018) which means third accreditation cycle, accreditation criteria were developed to standardize the educational environment and programs and to be used for curriculum development in order to continually improve the quality of basic medical education. Most recently, the ASK 2019 (Accreditation Standards of KIMEE 2019) accreditation cycle focused on qualitative evaluations in accordance with the World Federation of Medical Education’s accreditation criteria to reach the international level of basic medical education, which emphasizes the need for a student-centered curriculum, communication with society, and evaluation through a comprehensive basic medical education course. The KIMEE has developed a basic medical education evaluation and accreditation system in a step-by-step manner, as outlined above. Understanding previous processes will be helpful for the future development of accreditation criteria for medical schools in Korea.

Keyword

Accreditation; Curriculum; Longitudinal studies; Medical schools; Republic of Korea

Reference

References

1. Lee MS, Suh DJ, Yang EB, Chai JY, Chae GT, Ahn DS, Kim DG. The development tasks of medical school accreditation in Korea. Korean J Med Educ. 2002; 14:73–83. https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2002.14.1.73.
Article
2. Korean Council for University Education. The 30-year history of the Korean Council for University Education [Internet]. Seoul: Korean Council for University Education;2013. [cited 2020 Mar 29]. Available from: http://www.kcue.or.kr/about/kcue_30history.php.
3. Lee SY, Shin JS, Lee SH. How to execute Context, Input, Process, and Product evaluation model in medical health education. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2019; 16:40. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2019.16.40.
Article
4. Yang EB. A study on the classification validity and predictive validity of accreditation standards for medical schools in Korea. Korean J Med Educ. 2002; 14:213–226. https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2002.14.2.213.
Article
5. Yang EB. Analysis on the performance and tasks of accreditation system for medical colleges. J Korean Med Assoc. 2008; 51:586–592. https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2008.51.6.586.
Article
6. Kim SH. Meta-analysis of the accreditation of medical schools (the second cycle). Seoul: Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation;2011.
7. Lim MS, Huh S. Goodness of fit of the items used in the 2nd cycle of evaluation and accreditation of medical schools by the Korea Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation based on the Rasch model. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2019; 16:28. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2019.16.28.
Article
8. Ministry of Education. Higher Education Act [Internet]. Sejong: Ministry of Education;2015. [cited 2020 Apr 2]. Available from: http://www.law.go.kr/LSW/eng/engMain.do.
9. Kim SH. Meta-analysis of the accreditation of medical schools (the post-second cycle). Seoul: Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation;2015.
10. World Federation for Medical Education. Basic medical education: WFME global standards for quality improvement, 2015 revision [Internet]. Copenhagen: World Federation for Medical Education;2015. [cited 2020 Mar 29]. Available from: https://wfme.org/standards/bme/.
11. Ahn D. The limitation of the current accreditation system for basic medical education in Republic of Korea. J Korean Med Assoc. 2013; 56:1050–1052. https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2013.56.12.1050.
Article
12. Ahn D. Introducing a legal mandate for basic medical education accreditation in Korea. Korean J Med Educ. 2016; 28:5–7. https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2016.3.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JEEHP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr