Obstet Gynecol Sci.  2020 Apr;63(3):251-260. 10.5468/ogs.2020.63.3.251.

Changes in the perinatal outcomes of twin pregnancies delivered at a tertiary referral center in Korea during a 24-year period from 1995 to 2018

• Hong JY
• Lee HR
• Kim Y
• Kim YM
• Sung JH
• Choi SJ
• Oh Sy
• Roh hR

• KMID: 2500414
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.2020.63.3.251

Abstract

Objective
To analyze the changes in the clinical characteristics and perinatal outcomes of twin pregnancies delivered at a tertiary referral center in Korea during a 24-year period.
Methods
This was a retrospective cohort study of twin pregnancies delivered at 24–40 weeks of gestation, from 1995 to 2018. The subjects were divided into 4 groups according to the year of delivery: 1995–2000, 2001–2006, 2007–2012, and 2013–2018. The trends in the changes in the twin birth rate, maternal age, assisted reproductive technology (ART) pregnancy rate, chorionicity, obstetric complications, delivery outcomes, and neonatal outcomes over the periods were analyzed.
Results
A total of 2,133 twin pregnancies were included in the study. The twin birth rate increased from 16.7/1,000 in 1995–2000 to 42.2/1,000 in 2001–2006, 49.5/1,000 in 2007–2012, and 61.8/1,000 in 2013–2018. The maternal age and ART pregnancy and dichorionic twin rates increased, while the monochorionic twin rate decreased over the periods. The incidence of fetal congenital anomalies, cervical incompetence, gestational diabetes mellitus, preeclampsia, and placental abruption increased over the periods. The preterm birth (PTB) rate significantly decreased owing to the decreasing elective late-PTB rate; however, the early-PTB rate significantly increased.
Conclusion
This study found that twin pregnancies increased steadily over the last 24 years and that the increase was related to increased maternal age and ART pregnancy rate. The incidence of obstetric complications increased over the periods; however, the neonatal intensive care unit admission rate decreased, along with decreases in the elective late-PTB rate.

Keyword

Twin pregnancy; Obstetric complications; Delivery

Reference

1. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK. Births in the United States, 2016. NCHS Data Brief. 2017; 1–8.

2. Korean Statistical Information Service. Birth data for 2016, Korea. Daejeon: Korean Statistical Information Service;2017.

3. Lee GH, Song HJ, Lee KS, Choi YM. Current status of assisted reproductive technology in Korea, 2010. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2015; 42:8–13. PMID: 25874168.

4. Aduloju OP, Olofinbiyi B, Olagbuji BN, Ade-Ojo IP, Akintayo A. Obstetric outcome of twin gestations in a tertiary hospital South-western Nigeria. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015; 28:900–904. PMID: 25030878.

5. Luke B, Keith LG. The contribution of singletons, twins and triplets to low birth weight, infant mortality and handicap in the United States. J Reprod Med. 1992; 37:661–666. PMID: 1432978.

6. Ananth CV, Joseph KS, Demissie K, Vintzileos AM. Trends in twin preterm birth subtypes in the United States, 1989 through 2000: impact on perinatal mortality. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 193:1076–1082. PMID: 16157115.

7. Yoo EH, Chun D, Kim MJ, Cha HH, Seong WJ. Comparison of perinatal outcomes in late preterm birth between singleton and twin pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2017; 60:421–426. PMID: 28989917.

8. Black M, Bhattacharya S. Epidemiology of multiple pregnancy and the effect of assisted conception. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010; 15:306–312. PMID: 20630816.

9. Masheer S, Maheen H, Munim S. Perinatal outcome of twin pregnancies according to chorionicity: an observational study from tertiary care hospital. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015; 28:23–25. PMID: 24605797.

10. Doss AE, Mancuso MS, Cliver SP, Jauk VC, Jenkins SM. Gestational age at delivery and perinatal outcomes of twin gestations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 207:410.e1–410.e6. PMID: 22959832.

11. Acosta-Rojas R, Becker J, Munoz-Abellana B, Ruiz C, Carreras E, Gratacos E, et al. Twin chorionicity and the risk of adverse perinatal outcome. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007; 96:98–102. PMID: 17250837.

12. Hansen M, Kurinczuk JJ, Milne E, de Klerk N, Bower C. Assisted reproductive technology and birth defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2013; 19:330–353. PMID: 23449641.

13. Wen J, Jiang J, Ding C, Dai J, Liu Y, Xia Y, et al. Birth defects in children conceived by in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2012; 97:1331–1337.e1-4. PMID: 22480819.

14. Tararbit K, Lelong N, Jouannic JM, Goffinet F, Khoshnood B; EPICARD Study Group. Is the probability of prenatal diagnosis or termination of pregnancy different for fetuses with congenital anomalies conceived following assisted reproductive techniques? A population-based evaluation of fetuses with congenital heart defects. BJOG. 2015; 122:924–931. PMID: 25752912.

15. Moses XJ, Torres T, Rasmussen A, George C. Congenital anomalies identified at birth among infants born following assisted reproductive technology in Colorado. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2014; 100:92–99. PMID: 24532453.

16. Reefhuis J, Honein MA. Maternal age and non-chromosomal birth defects, Atlanta--1968–2000: teenager or thirty-something, who is at risk? Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2004; 70:572–579. PMID: 15368555.

17. Cleary-Goldman J, Malone FD, Vidaver J, Ball RH, Nyberg DA, Comstock CH, et al. Impact of maternal age on obstetric outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 105:983–990. PMID: 15863534.

18. Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, Romero R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet. 2008; 371:75–84. PMID: 18177778.

19. Rafael TJ, Berghella V, Alfirevic Z. Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in multiple pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; CD009166. PMID: 25208049.

20. Nam SH, Lee JE, Choi SJ, Oh SY, Kim JH, Roh CR. Pregnancy outcome of cervical incompetence in twin versus singleton pregnancies. Korean J Perinatol. 2007; 18:149–153.

21. Meath AJ, Ramsey PS, Mulholland TA, Rosenquist RG, Lesnick T, Ramin KD. Comparative longitudinal study of cervical length and induced shortening changes among singleton, twin, and triplet pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 192:1410–1415. PMID: 15902123.

22. Kahn B, Lumey LH, Zybert PA, Lorenz JM, Cleary-Goldman J, D'Alton ME, et al. Prospective risk of fetal death in singleton, twin, and triplet gestations: implications for practice. Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 102:685–692. PMID: 14550996.

23. Cheung YB, Yip P, Karlberg J. Mortality of twins and singletons by gestational age: a varying-coefficient approach. Am J Epidemiol. 2000; 152:1107–1116. PMID: 11130615.

24. Lewi L, Van Schoubroeck D, Gratacós E, Witters I, Timmerman D, Deprest J. Monochorionic diamniotic twins: complications and management options. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 15:177–194. PMID: 12634610.

25. Van Mieghem T, De Heus R, Lewi L, Klaritsch P, Kollmann M, Baud D, et al. Prenatal management of monoamniotic twin pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 124:498–506. PMID: 25162249.

26. Vergani P, Russo FM, Follesa I, Cozzolino S, Fedeli T, Ventura L, et al. Perinatal complications in twin pregnancies after 34 weeks: effects of gestational age at delivery and chorionicity. Am J Perinatol. 2013; 30:545–550. PMID: 23096054.

27. Newman RB, Unal ER. Multiple gestations: timing of indicated late preterm and early-term births in uncomplicated dichorionic, monochorionic, and monoamniotic twins. Semin Perinatol. 2011; 35:277–285. PMID: 21962627.

28. Spong CY, Mercer BM, D'alton M, Kilpatrick S, Blackwell S, Saade G. Timing of indicated late-preterm and early-term birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 118:323–333. PMID: 21775849.

29. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Antenatal management of multiple gestations: NICE clinical guideline 129 [Internet]. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence;c2011. cited 2015 Mar 20. Available from: http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG129.

30. Lee HJ, Kim SH, Chang KH, Sung JH, Choi SJ, Oh SY, et al. Gestational age at delivery and neonatal outcome in uncomplicated twin pregnancies: what is the optimal gestational age for delivery according to chorionicity? Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2016; 59:9–16. PMID: 26866030.

31. Sung JH, Kim SH, Kim YM, Kim JH, Kim MN, Lee HR, et al. Neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancies delivered at late-preterm versus term gestation based on chorionicity and indication for delivery. J Perinat Med. 2016; 44:903–911. PMID: 27149198.

32. Lee YM, Cleary-Goldman J, D'Alton ME. The impact of multiple gestations on late preterm (near-term) births. Clin Perinatol. 2006; 33:777–792. PMID: 17148004.

33. Smith GC, Shah I, White IR, Pell JP, Dobbie R. Mode of delivery and the risk of delivery-related perinatal death among twins at term: a retrospective cohort study of 8073 births. BJOG. 2005; 112:1139–1144. PMID: 16045531.

34. Smith GC, Fleming KM, White IR. Birth order of twins and risk of perinatal death related to delivery in England, Northern Ireland, and Wales, 1994–2003: retrospective cohort study. BMJ. 2007; 334:576. PMID: 17337456.

35. Barrett JF, Hannah ME, Hutton EK, Willan AR, Allen AC, Armson BA, et al. A randomized trial of planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369:1295–1305. PMID: 24088091.

36. Schmitz T, Carnavalet CC, Azria E, Lopez E, Cabrol D, Goffinet F. Neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancy according to the planned mode of delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 111:695–703. PMID: 18310373.

37. Rossi AC, Mullin PM, Chmait RH. Neonatal outcomes of twins according to birth order, presentation and mode of delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2011; 118:523–532. PMID: 21291505.

38. Yamashita A, Ishii K, Taguchi T, Mabuchi A, Ota S, Sasahara J, et al. Adverse perinatal outcomes related to the delivery mode in women with monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies. J Perinat Med. 2014; 42:769–775. PMID: 24728848.

39. Lim JS, Lim SW, Ahn JH, Song BS, Shim KS, Hwang IT. New Korean reference for birth weight by gestational age and sex: data from the Korean Statistical Information Service (2008–2012). Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2014; 19:146–153. PMID: 25346919.