Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol.  2020 May;13(2):164-172. 10.21053/ceo.2019.00192.

Tumor Control and Quality of Life in Skin Cancer Patients With Extensive Multilayered Nasal Defects

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany

Abstract


Objectives
. The reconstruction after nasal skin cancer (NSC) resection is often practiced differently. The objective of this study is to evaluate the influence of patient-, tumor- and management-related factors on the role of surgery and choice of reconstruction.
Methods
. This was a monocentric retrospective study of patients who were diagnosed with a NSC (squamous cell or basal cell carcinoma) and suffered from an extended defect after ablative surgery between 2003 and 2013. Twenty-five patients were included. Tumors were staged using the Union for International Cancer Control (eighth edition) TNM classification for primary cutaneous skin cancer of the head and neck. Preferred treatment was surgery in all patients. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measurement was evaluated by one generic (36-Item Short Form Health Survey [SF-36]) and two organ-specific questionnaires (Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation [ROE] and Functional Rhinoplasty Outcome Inventory 17 [FROI-17]) after therapy. Survival data were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and statistical analysis was performed by log-rank, analysis of variance, Levene’s and t-tests. The median follow-up time was 2.1 years.
Results
. According to the Union for International Cancer Control classification, 13 of 25 tumors were staged as pT1 (52%), four as pT2 (16%), seven as pT3 (28%) and one as pT4a (4%). Seventy-two percent of patients (n=18) chose plastic reconstruction, and for the remaining 28% (n=7) of the patients opted for an implant-retained prosthesis. The overall survival was 69.5% after 5 years, the 5-year recurrence-free survival was 90.9% and the 5-year disease-specific survival was 100%. There was no significant difference in the HRQoL outcome between both rehabilitation methods.
Conclusion
. Surgery in NSC gives an excellent oncologic prognosis. Nasal reconstruction and prostheses are both very viable options depending on tumor stage and biology, the patient’s wishes as well as the experience of the surgeon.

Keyword

Skin Neoplasms; Surgical Oncology; Nasal Surgical Procedures; Bone-Anchored Prosthesis; Quality of Life

Figure

  • Fig. 1. (A-C) Partial rhinectomy and reconstruction with a paramedian forehead flap, anterior based septal mucoperichondrious flap, and cartilage graft. (D-F) Total rhinectomy followed by reconstruction with an implant-retained nasal prosthesis (nasal plate of the Epiplating System by Medicon eG, Tuttlingen, Germany; anaplastologist Jörn Brom, Heidelberg, Germany).

  • Fig. 2. Kaplan-Maier plots for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) depending on T1/2 vs. T3/4, basal cell carcinoma (BCC) vs. cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC), prosthetic rehabilitation (PR) vs. surgical reconstruction (SR). Disease-specific survival was 100% (not shown).

  • Fig. 3. Box-plot analysis showing the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) subscores (P<0.05) comparing sub-cohort (cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma [cSCC] versus basal cell carcinoma [BCC]; surgical reconstruction versus prosthetic rehabilitation, T1/2 versus T3/4, and in the SF-36 to the norm-distributed patient cohort). A higher SF-36 score indicates higher satisfaction. Only significant differences are presented. NSC, nasal skin cancer.


Reference

1. Brana I, Siu LL. Locally advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer: treatment choice based on risk factors and optimizing drug prescription. Ann Oncol. 2012; Sep. 23 Suppl 10:x178–85.
Article
2. Lee K, McKean ME, McGregor IA. Metastatic patterns of squamous carcinoma in the parotid lymph nodes. Br J Plast Surg. 1985; Jan. 38(1):6–10.
Article
3. Wu S, Han J, Li WQ, Li T, Qureshi AA. Basal-cell carcinoma incidence and associated risk factors in U.S. women and men. Am J Epidemiol. 2013; Sep. 178(6):890–7.
Article
4. Muzic JG, Schmitt AR, Wright AC, Alniemi DT, Zubair AS, Olazagasti Lourido JM, et al. Incidence and trends of basal cell carcinoma and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 2000 to 2010. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017; Jun. 92:890–8.
5. Bath-Hextall F, Leonardi-Bee J, Smith C, Meal A, Hubbard R. Trends in incidence of skin basal cell carcinoma: additional evidence from a UK primary care database study. Int J Cancer. 2007; Nov. 121(9):2105–8.
Article
6. Preston DS, Stern RS. Nonmelanoma cancers of the skin. N Engl J Med. 1992; Dec. 327(23):1649–62.
Article
7. Telfer NR, Colver GB, Morton CA; British Association of Dermatologists. Guidelines for the management of basal cell carcinoma. Br J Dermatol. 2008; Jul. 159(1):35–48.
Article
8. Bussu F, Tagliaferri L, Mattiucci G, Parrilla C, Dinapoli N, Micciche F, et al. Comparison of interstitial brachytherapy and surgery as primary treatments for nasal vestibule carcinomas. Laryngoscope. 2016; Feb. 126(2):367–71.
Article
9. Federspil PA. Ear epistheses as an alternative to autogenous reconstruction. Facial Plast Surg. 2009; Aug. 25(3):190–203.
Article
10. Wray J, Morris CG, Kirwan JM, Amdur RJ, Werning JW, Dziegielewski PT, et al. Radiation therapy for nasal vestibule squamous cell carcinoma: a 40-year experience. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016; Mar. 273(3):661–9.
Article
11. Veness MJ, Chong L, Tiver K, Gebski V. Basal cell carcinoma of the nose: an Australian and New Zealand radiation oncology patterns-of-practice study. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2008; Aug. 52(4):382–93.
Article
12. Sedda AF, Rossi G, Cipriani C, Carrozzo AM, Donati P. Dermatological high-dose-rate brachytherapy for the treatment of basal and squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2008; Nov. 33(6):745–9.
Article
13. Henry EL, Hart RD, Mark Taylor S, Trites JR, Harris J, O’Connell DA, et al. Total nasal reconstruction: use of a radial forearm free flap, titanium mesh, and a paramedian forehead flap. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010; Dec. 39(6):697–702.
14. Jeremic G, Brandt MG, Jordan K, Doyle PC, Yu E, Moore CC. Using photodynamic therapy as a neoadjuvant treatment in the surgical excision of nonmelanotic skin cancers: prospective study. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011; Feb. 40 Suppl 1:S82–9.
15. Kim HJ, Lee KH, Park SY, Kim HK. One-stage reconstruction for midfacial defect after radical tumor resection. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2012; Mar. 5(1):53–6.
Article
16. Park SS. Nasal reconstruction in the 21st century: a contemporary review. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2008; Mar. 1(1):1–9.
Article
17. van der Eerden PA, Prins ME, Lohuis PJ, Balm FA, Vuyk HD. Eighteen years of experience in Mohs micrographic surgery and conventional excision for nonmelanoma skin cancer treated by a single facial plastic surgeon and pathologist. Laryngoscope. 2010; Dec. 120(12):2378–84.
Article
18. Wollina U, Bennewitz A, Langner D. Basal cell carcinoma of the outer nose: overview on surgical techniques and analysis of 312 patients. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2014; Jul. 7(3):143–50.
Article
19. Zaoui K, Thielen HM, Plath M, Baumann I, Plinkert PK, Federspil PA. Quality of life after nasal cancer resection: surgical versus prosthetic rehabilitation. Rhinology. 2018; Dec. 56(4):400–6.
20. Zaoui K, Plinkert PK, Federspil PA. Primary surgical treatment of nasal vestibule cancer: therapeutic outcome and reconstructive strategies. Rhinology. 2018; Dec. 56(4):393–9.
21. Bulut OC, Plinkert PK, Wallner F, Baumann I. Quality of life in functional rhinoplasty: rhinoplasty outcomes evaluation German version (ROE-D). Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016; Sep. 273(9):2569–73.
Article
22. Bulut OC, Wallner F, Plinkert PK, Prochnow S, Kuhnt C, Baumann I. Quality of life after septorhinoplasty measured with the Functional Rhinoplasty Outcome Inventory 17 (FROI-17). Rhinology. 2015; Mar. 53(1):54–8.
Article
23. Rohrich RJ, Griffin JR, Ansari M, Beran SJ, Potter JK. Nasal reconstruction--beyond aesthetic subunits: a 15-year review of 1334 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004; Nov. 114(6):1405–16.
Article
24. Han DH, Mangoba DC, Lee DY, Jin HR. Reconstruction of nasal alar defects in asian patients. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2012; Sep-Oct. 14(5):312–7.
Article
25. Kim YJ, Cho HH, Kim SO, Lee JB, Lee SC. Reconstruction algorithm for nasal basal cell carcinoma with skin involvement only: analysis of 221 cases repaired by minor surgery. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2015; Oct. 40(7):728–34.
Article
26. Moolenburgh SE, Mureau MA, Duivenvoorden HJ, Hofer SO. Validation of a questionnaire assessing patient’s aesthetic and functional outcome after nasal reconstruction: the patient NAFEQ-score. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009; May. 62(5):656–62.
Article
27. Becker C, Becker AM, Dahlem KK, Offergeld C, Pfeiffer J. Aesthetic and functional outcomes in patients with a nasal prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017; Nov. 46(11):1446–50.
Article
28. Becker C, Becker AM, Pfeiffer J. Health-related quality of life in patients with nasal prosthesis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016; Jan. 44(1):75–9.
Article
29. Noel W, Duron JB, Jabbour S, Revol M, Mazouz-Dorval S. Three-stage folded forehead flap for nasal reconstruction: objective and subjective measurements of aesthetic and functional outcomes. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018; Apr. 71(4):548–56.
Article
30. Hassan SJ, Weymuller EA Jr. Assessment of quality of life in head and neck cancer patients. Head Neck. 1993; Nov-Dec. 15(6):485–96.
Article
31. Rogers SN, Gwanne S, Lowe D, Humphris G, Yueh B, Weymuller EA Jr. The addition of mood and anxiety domains to the University of Washington quality of life scale. Head Neck. 2002; Jun. 24(6):521–9.
Article
32. Bulut C, Wallner F, Plinkert PK, Baumann I. Development and validation of the Functional Rhinoplasty Outcome Inventory 17 (FROI-17). Rhinology. 2014; Dec. 52(4):315–9.
Article
33. Alsarraf R, Larrabee WF Jr, Anderson S, Murakami CS, Johnson CM Jr. Measuring cosmetic facial plastic surgery outcomes: a pilot study. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2001; Jul-Sep. 3(3):198–201.
34. Saleh AM, Younes A, Friedman O. Cosmetics and function: quality-of-life changes after rhinoplasty surgery. Laryngoscope. 2012; Feb. 122(2):254–9.
Article
35. Hellings PW, Nolst Trenite GJ. Long-term patient satisfaction after revision rhinoplasty. Laryngoscope. 2007; Jun. 117(6):985–9.
Article
36. Faidiga GB, Carenzi LR, Yassuda CC, Silveira F, Lago Td, Leite MG, et al. Long-term evaluation in aesthetic rhinoplasty in an academic referral center. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2010; Jul-Aug. 76(4):437–41.
Full Text Links
  • CEO
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr