J Nutr Health.  2019 Feb;52(1):1-5. 10.4163/jnh.2019.52.1.1.

A big picture view of precision nutrition: from reductionism to holism

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Nutritional Science and Food Management, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 03760, Republic of Korea. orank@ewha.ac.kr

Abstract

PURPOSE
This review describes the historical changes in nutrition philosophy from a reductionist to a holistic approach during the 20th century. Also, the role and efficient use of a holistic approach to precision nutrition are discussed.
RESULTS
Over the past century, significant progress has been made in human nutrition research, unraveling fundamental mechanisms of single nutrients on single targets or pathways. This kind of a reductionist approach has helped to save populations from nutrient deficiency diseases and improve associated health outcomes in large parts of the world. However, a new set of nutrition problems, like obesity and diet-related chronic diseases, are growing each year worldwide, increasing the financial burden on the health care system. A linear cause-effect association between single nutrients and a single physiologic effect, is insufficient to solve the complex nutrition-health relationships. Research that involves a more holistic rather than reductionist approach is needed to tackle a new set of nutrition problems. Recent advances in technology, informatics, and statistical methods are enabling an understanding of the diversity of individuals and the complex interactions between foods and human bodies, leading to the concept of "precision nutrition."
CONCLUSION
The emerging goal of precision nutrition is to provide tailored dietary advice for maintaining health and preventing obesity and diet-related chronic diseases. The parts are already being installed. To grab the complexity, reductionism and holism must be used interdependently.

Keyword

reductionism; holism; nutrient deficiency disease; diet-related chronic disease; precision nutrition

MeSH Terms

Chronic Disease
Deficiency Diseases
Delivery of Health Care
Human Body
Humans
Informatics
Obesity
Philosophy

Cited by  1 articles

Validation of soy isoflavone intake and its health effects: a review of the development of exposure biomarkers
Hwan-Hee Jang, Young-Min Lee, Jeong-Sook Choe, Oran Kwon
Nutr Res Pract. 2021;15(1):1-11.    doi: 10.4162/nrp.2021.15.1.1.


Reference

1. Rosenberg IH. Challenges and opportunities in the translation of the science of vitamins. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007; 85(1):325S–327S.
Article
2. Hoffmann I. Transcending reductionism in nutrition research. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003; 78:3 Suppl. 514S–516S.
Article
3. Fardet A, Rock E. Toward a new philosophy of preventive nutrition: from a reductionist to a holistic paradigm to improve nutritional recommendations. Adv Nutr. 2014; 5(4):430–446.
Article
4. O'Sullivan A, Henrick B, Dixon B, Barile D, Zivkovic A, Smilowitz J, et al. 21st century toolkit for optimizing population health through precision nutrition. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2018; 58(17):3004–3015.
5. Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, Lozano R, Michaud C, Ezzati M, et al. Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet. 2012; 380(9859):2163–2196.
6. Statistics Korea. Homepage [Internet]. Daejeon: Statistics Korea;2018. cited 2018 Dec 3. Available from: http://kosis.kr.
7. Zhang X, Yap Y, Wei D, Chen G, Chen F. Novel omics technologies in nutrition research. Biotechnol Adv. 2008; 26(2):169–176.
Article
8. Raubenheimer D, Simpson SJ. Nutritional ecology and human health. Annu Rev Nutr. 2016; 36(1):603–626.
Article
9. Carpenter KJ. A short history of nutritional science: part 3 (1912-1944). J Nutr. 2003; 133(10):3023–3032.
Article
10. Mozaffarian D, Rosenberg I, Uauy R. History of modern nutrition science-implications for current research, dietary guidelines, and food policy. BMJ. 2018; 361:k2392.
Article
11. Fardet A, Boirie Y. Associations between food and beverage groups and major diet-related chronic diseases: an exhaustive review of pooled/meta-analyses and systematic reviews. Nutr Rev. 2014; 72(12):741–762.
Article
12. Ahn AC, Tewari M, Poon CS, Phillips RS. The limits of reductionism in medicine: could systems biology offer an alternative? PLoS Med. 2006; 3(6):e208.
Article
13. Scrinis G. Nutritionism: the science and politics of dietary advice. New York (NY): Columbia University Press;2013.
14. Fardet A, Rock E. From a reductionist to a holistic approach in preventive nutrition to define new and more ethical paradigms. Healthcare (Basel). 2015; 3(4):1054–1063.
Article
15. Harper AE. Contributions of women scientists in the U.S. to the development of recommended dietary allowances. J Nutr. 2003; 133(11):3698–3702.
Article
16. Paik HY. Dietary reference intakes for Koreans (KDRIs). Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2008; 17:Suppl 2. 416–419.
17. Gallagher R, Appenzeller T. Beyond reductionism. Science. 1999; 284(5411):79.
Article
18. Omenn GS, Goodman GE, Thornquist MD, Balmes J, Cullen MR, Glass A, et al. Risk factors for lung cancer and for intervention effects in CARET, the beta-carotene and retinol efficacy trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996; 88(21):1550–1559.
Article
19. Blumberg J, Block G. The alpha-tocopherol, beta-carotene cancer prevention study in Finland. Nutr Rev. 1994; 52(7):242–245.
Article
20. Rietjens IM, Boersma MG, Haan L, Spenkelink B, Awad HM, Cnubben NH, et al. The pro-oxidant chemistry of the natural antioxidants vitamin C, vitamin E, carotenoids and flavonoids. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2002; 11(3-4):321–333.
Article
21. Fardet A. Food health potential is primarily due to its matrix structure, then nutrient composition: a new paradigm for food classification according to technological processes applied. J Nutr Health Food Eng. 2014; 1(5):208–209.
Article
22. Sahyoun NR, Pratt CA, Anderson A. Evaluation of nutrition education interventions for older adults: a proposed framework. J Am Diet Assoc. 2004; 104(1):58–69.
Article
23. van Ommen B, Cavallieri D, Roche HM, Klein UI, Daniel H. The challenges for molecular nutrition research 4: the “nutritional systems biology level”. Genes Nutr. 2008; 3(3-4):107–113.
Article
24. Davis CD, Hord NG. Nutritional “omics” technologies for elucidating the role(s) of bioactive food components in colon cancer prevention. J Nutr. 2005; 135(11):2694–2697.
Article
25. Weinstock GM. Genomic approaches to studying the human microbiota. Nature. 2012; 489(7415):250–256.
Article
26. de Toro-Martín J, Arsenault BJ, Després JP, Vohl MC. Precision nutrition: a review of personalized nutritional approaches for the prevention and management of metabolic syndrome. Nutrients. 2017; 9(8):E913.
Article
27. Wang DD, Hu FB. Precision nutrition for prevention and management of type 2 diabetes. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018; 6(5):416–426.
Article
28. Lim Y, Song TJ, Hwang W, Kim JY, Lee D, Kim YJ, et al. Synergistic effects of Sanghuang⁻Danshen bioactives on arterial stiffness in a randomized clinical trial of healthy smokers: an integrative approach to in silico network analysis. Nutrients. 2019; 11(1):pii: E108.
Article
29. Vakili S, Caudill MA. Personalized nutrition: nutritional genomics as a potential tool for targeted medical nutrition therapy. Nutr Rev. 2007; 65(7):301–315.
Article
30. Panagiotou G, Nielsen J. Nutritional systems biology: definitions and approaches. Annu Rev Nutr. 2009; 29(1):329–339.
Article
31. Betts JA, Gonzalez JT. Personalised nutrition: what makes you so special? Nutr Bull. 2016; 41(4):353–359.
32. Kim YJ, Huh I, Kim JY, Park S, Ryu SH, Kim KB, et al. Integration of traditional and metabolomics biomarkers identifies prognostic metabolites for predicting responsiveness to nutritional intervention against oxidative stress and inflammation. Nutrients. 2017; 9(3):pii: E233.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JNH
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr