J Adv Prosthodont.  2019 Dec;11(6):350-357. 10.4047/jap.2019.11.6.350.

Accuracy of different electronic torque drivers: A comparative evaluation

• Ko BD
• Son K
• Kang SH
• Lee KB

• KMID: 2466250
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2019.11.6.350

Abstract

PURPOSE
This study aims to evaluate the loosening torque on the implant fixture, and to assess the accuracy of difference electronic torque drivers.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Three electronic torque drivers were used to measure the loosening torque on the implant system (AnyOne; MegaGen). The implant fixtures were divided among the 3 electronic torque driver types (W&H, SAESHIN, and NSK group) and 9 for each group. The screws were fastened at the implant fixture by three electronic torque drivers using the tightening torques recommended by the manufacturers of the drivers. After 10 minutes, the screws were again fastened at the implant fixture with equal torque. Then, the loosening torques were measured with an MGT12 torque gauge (MARK-10, Inc.). This measurement procedure was repeated 10 times under loosening torques of 15 Ncm, 25 Ncm, and 35 Ncm. In the statistical analysis, all values of loosening torque were analyzed with the one-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis test (α=.05) for comparative evaluation.
RESULTS
There were significant inter-group differences at loosening torques of 15 Ncm and 25 Ncm (P<.05). The accuracy of the NSK driver was the highest, followed by SAESHIN and W&H. There was no significant difference between NSK and W&H at 35 Ncm (P>.05). The SAESHIN driver showed the closest loosening torque at 35 Ncm.
CONCLUSION
The most accurate loosening torques were SAESHIN at 35 Ncm, and NSK at 15 Ncm and 25 Ncm. Since the loosening torque may vary depending on the tightening torques and electronic torque drivers, periodic calibration of the electronic torque driver is recommended.

Keyword

Accuracy; Loosening torque; Electronic torque driver; Implant fixture

MeSH Terms

Calibration
Torque*