J Korean Med Assoc.  2019 Dec;62(12):611-615. 10.5124/jkma.2019.62.12.611.

Nonsurgical correction of presbyopia

• Na KS

• KMID: 2465354
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2019.62.12.611

Abstract

This study aimed to describe the basic optical properties for presbyopia correction, including eyeglasses and contact lenses. Conventional eyeglasses are the most established technology for presbyopia correction, and contact lenses have been recognized to have a huge potential in presbyopia correction. However, successful treatment using contact lenses is dependent on age-related factors, such as upper and lower eyelid movements, palpebral aperture, and decreased lacrimal secretion and tear stability. Monovision and multifocality are optical properties of the lens that form the basis of presbyopia correction. The monovision method is based on the principle of neuro-adaptation, wherein one eye automatically selects a clear image and suppresses an unclear image for processing in the brain when there is a difference in the clarity of the images obtained from both the eyes because of anisopia, which is characterized by unequal visual power between the two eyes. Simultaneous views of near and far objects cannot be achieved using eyeglasses, but these can be realized using contact lenses or intraocular lenses. Alternative views of near and far objects can be achieved using a variety of bifocal contact lenses, which function similar to bifocal eyeglasses. Traditional strategies for presbyopia correction, including the use of monovision, bi/tri/multifocal, and progressive eyeglasses and the use of contact lenses, are being challenged by novel strategies involving pharmacotherapy and electrostimulation. Although the immediate prospect of any newly developed innovation remains slim, improved lens profiles would lead to a better match between the lens and the needs of individuals with presbyopia.

Keyword

Presbyopia; Eyeglasses; Contact lenses

MeSH Terms

Brain
Contact Lenses
Drug Therapy
Eyeglasses
Eyelids
Lenses, Intraocular
Methods
Presbyopia*
Tears

Reference

1. Kim HK, Kim HM, Chung SK. Effectiveness of multifocal soft contact lens for presbyopia. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2008; 49:727–731.

2. Wolffsohn JS, Davies LN. Presbyopia: effectiveness of correction strategies. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2019; 68:124–143.

3. Charman WN. Developments in the correction of presbyopia I: spectacle and contact lenses. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2014; 34:8–29.

4. Callina T, Reynolds TP. Traditional methods for the treatment of presbyopia: spectacles, contact lenses, bifocal contact lenses. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2006; 19:25–33.

5. Jiang GM, Tang SH, Shan Z. Personalizing of spectacles. Eye Sci. 2012; 27:220–224.

6. Alvarez TL, Kim EH, Granger-Donetti B. Adaptation to progressive additive lenses: potential factors to consider. Sci Rep. 2017; 7:2529.

7. Godio LB, Keating MP. Clinical determination of the corrected retinal image size in spectacle-corrected aphakes. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1984; 61:160–165.

8. Lewis HT. Parameters of contact lens-spectacle telescopic sys-tems and considerations in prescribing. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1986; 63:387–391.

9. Johannsdottir KR, Stelmach LB. Monovision: a review of the scientific literature. Optom Vis Sci. 2001; 78:646–651.

10. Erickson P, Schor C. Visual function with presbyopic contact lens correction. Optom Vis Sci. 1990; 67:22–28.

11. Evans BJ. Monovision: a review. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2007; 27:417–439.

12. Farid M, Steinert RF. Patient selection for monovision laser refractive surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2009; 20:251–254.

13. Goldberg DB. Laser in situ keratomileusis monovision. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001; 27:1449–1455.

14. Gupta N, Wolffsohn JS, Naroo SA. Comparison of near visual acuity and reading metrics in presbyopia correction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009; 35:1401–1409.

15. Imbeau L, Majzoub S, Thillay A, Bonnet-Brilhault F, Pisella PJ, Batty M. Presbyopia compensation: looking for cortical predictors. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017; 101:223–226.

16. Sivardeen A, Laughton D, Wolffsohn JS. Randomized crossover trial of silicone hydrogel presbyopic contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2016; 93:141–149.

17. Hayashi K, Yoshida M, Manabe S, Hayashi H. Optimal amount of anisometropia for pseudophakic monovision. J Refract Surg. 2011; 27:332–338.

18. Watanabe K, Negishi K, Dogru M, Yamaguchi T, Torii H, Tsubota K. Effect of pupil size on uncorrected visual acuity in pseudophakic eyes with astigmatism. J Refract Surg. 2013; 29:25–29.

19. Fawcett SL, Herman WK, Alfieri CD, Castleberry KA, Parks MM, Birch EE. Stereoacuity and foveal fusion in adults with long-standing surgical monovision. J AAPOS. 2001; 5:342–347.

20. Perez-Prados R, Pinero DP, Perez-Cambrodi RJ, Madrid-Costa D. Soft multifocal simultaneous image contact lenses: a review. Clin Exp Optom. 2017; 100:107–127.

21. Li SM, Kang MT, Wu SS, Meng B, Sun YY, Wei SF, Liu L, Peng X, Chen Z, Zhang F, Wang N. Studies using concentric ring bifocal and peripheral add multifocal contact lenses to slow myopia progression in school-aged children: a meta-analysis. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017; 37:51–59.

22. Tuuminen R, Kanclerz P, Grzybowski A. Methodological challenges with randomized clinical trials for multifocal intraocular lenses. Surv Ophthalmol. 2019; 10. 31. S0039-6257(19)30286-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2019.10.007. [Epub].

23. Park SY, Choi YJ, Jung JW, Choi M, Kim EK, Seo KY, Kim TI. Clinical efficacy of pinhole soft contact lenses for the correction of presbyopia. Semin Ophthalmol. 2019; 34:106–114.

24. Abdelkader A. Improved presbyopic vision with miotics. Eye Contact Lens. 2015; 41:323–327.

25. Benozzi J, Benozzi G, Orman B. Presbyopia: a new potential pharmacological treatment. Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2012; 1:3–5.

26. Garner WH, Garner MH. Protein disulfide levels and lens elasticity modulation: applications for presbyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016; 57:2851–2863.

27. Gualdi L, Gualdi F, Rusciano D, Ambrosio R Jr, Salomao MQ, Lopes B, Cappello V, Fintina T, Gualdi M. Ciliary Muscle electrostimulation to restore accommodation in patients with early presbyopia: preliminary results. J Refract Surg. 2017; 33:578–583.