Neurospine.  2019 Sep;16(3):386-402. 10.14245/ns.1938240.120.

Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Natural Course and the Value of Diagnostic Techniques: WFNS Spine Committee Recommendations

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey. zilelim@gmail.com
  • 2Department of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
  • 3Neurosurgery and Spine Services, Paras Hospitals, Gurugram, India.
  • 4Neurosurgical Department, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Hospital Lusíadas, Porto, Portugal.
  • 5Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital Lusíadas, Porto, Portugal.
  • 6Department of Neurosurgery, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
  • 7SRCC Children’s Hospital, Mumbai, India.
  • 8Kauvery Advanced Spine Centre, Chennai, India.
  • 9Department Neurosurgery and Spine Unit, Kovai Medical Center and Hospital, Tamilnadu, India.

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
This study presents the results of a systematic literature review conducted to determine most up-to-date information on the natural outcome of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and the most reliable diagnostic techniques.
METHODS
A literature search was performed for articles published during the last 10 years.
RESULTS
The natural course of patients with cervical stenosis and signs of myelopathy is quite variable. In patients with no symptoms, but significant stenosis, the risk of developing myelopathy with cervical stenosis is approximately 3% per year. Myelopathic signs are useful for the clinical diagnosis of CSM. However, they are not highly sensitive and may be absent in approximately one-fifth of patients with myelopathy. The electrophysiological tests to be used in CSM patients are motor evoked potential (MEP), spinal cord evoked potential, somatosensory evoked potential, and electromyography (EMG). The differential diagnosis of CSM from other neurological conditions can be accomplished by those tests. MEP and EMG monitoring are useful to reduce C5 root palsy during CSM surgery. Notable spinal cord T2 hyperintensity on cervical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is correlated with a worse outcome, whereas lighter signal changes may predict better outcomes. T1 hypointensity should be considered a sign of more advanced disease.
CONCLUSION
The natural course of CSM is quite variable. Signal changes on MRI and some electrophysiological tests are valuable adjuncts to diagnosis.

Keyword

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy; Electrophysiology; Myelopathic signs; MR signal intensity; Intraoperative monitoring; Magnetic resonance imaging

MeSH Terms

Constriction, Pathologic
Diagnosis
Diagnosis, Differential
Electromyography
Electrophysiology
Evoked Potentials
Evoked Potentials, Motor
Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Monitoring, Intraoperative
Paralysis
Spinal Cord
Spinal Cord Diseases*
Spine*
Full Text Links
  • NS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr