1. Choy WS, Kim KJ, Yang DH, Lee HH, Kim HY. Early results of mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in Korean patients. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 2006; 41:826–833.
Article
2. Price AJ, Webb J, Topf H, Dodd CA, Goodfellow JW, Murray DW. Rapid recovery after oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty through a short incision. J Arthroplasty. 2001; 16:970–976.
Article
3. Song MH, Kim BH, Ahn SJ, Yoo SH, Park JH. Results of the first fifty minimally invasive oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 2007; 42:515–522.
Article
4. Kozinn SC, Scott R. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989; 71:145–150.
Article
5. Goodfellow J, O'Connor J, Murray DW. The Oxford meniscal unicompartmental knee. J Knee Surg. 2002; 15:240–246.
6. Price AJ, Waite JC, Svard U. Long-term clinical results of the medial Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; (435):171–180.
Article
7. Seyler TM, Mont MA, Lai LP, et al. Mid-term results and factors affecting outcome of a metal-backed unicompartmental knee design: a case series. J Orthop Surg Res. 2009; 4:39.
Article
8. Skyrme AD, Mencia MM, Skinner PW. Early failure of the porous-coated anatomic cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a 5- to 9-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty. 2002; 17:201–205.
9. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989; (248):13–14.
Article
10. Argenson JN, Parratte S, Bertani A, et al. The new arthritic patient and arthroplasty treatment options. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 91 Suppl 5:43–48.
Article
11. Berger RA, Meneghini RM, Jacobs JJ, et al. Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87:999–1006.
Article
12. Clark M, Campbell DG, Kiss G, Dobson PJ, Lewis PL. Reintervention after mobile-bearing Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468:576–580.
Article
13. Dudley TE, Gioe TJ, Sinner P, Mehle S. Registry outcomes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty revisions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 466:1666–1670.
Article
14. Whittaker JP, Naudie DD, McAuley JP, McCalden RW, MacDonald SJ, Bourne RB. Does bearing design influence midterm survivorship of unicompartmental arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468:73–81.
Article
15. Parratte S, Pauly V, Aubaniac JM, Argenson JN. No long-term difference between fixed and mobile medial unicompartmental arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012; 470:61–68.
Article
16. O'Rourke MR, Gardner JJ, Callaghan JJ, et al. The John Insall Award: unicompartmental knee replacement: a minimum twenty-one-year followup, end-result study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; 440:27–37.
17. Kuipers BM, Kollen BJ, Bots PC, et al. Factors associated with reduced early survival in the Oxford phase III medial unicompartment knee replacement. Knee. 2010; 17:48–52.
Article
18. W-Dahl A, Robertsson O, Lidgren L, Miller L, Davidson D, Graves S. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients aged less than 65. Acta Orthop. 2010; 81:90–94.
Article
19. Price AJ, Dodd CA, Svard UG, Murray DW. Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients younger and older than 60 years of age. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005; 87:1488–1492.
Article
20. Berend KR, Lombardi AV Jr, Mallory TH, Adams JB, Groseth KL. Early failure of minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is associated with obesity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; 440:60–66.
Article
21. van der List JP, Chawla H, Zuiderbaan HA, Pearle AD. The role of preoperative patient characteristics on outcomes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis critique. J Arthroplasty. 2016; 31:2617–2627.
Article
22. Aleto TJ, Berend ME, Ritter MA, Faris PM, Meneghini RM. Early failure of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty leading to revision. J Arthroplasty. 2008; 23:159–163.
Article
23. Mukherjee K, Pandit H, Dodd CA, Ostlere S, Murray DW. The Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a radiological perspective. Clin Radiol. 2008; 63:1169–1176.
Article
24. Hutt JR, Farhadnia P, Massé V, LaVigne M, Vendittoli PA. A randomised trial of all-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial components in unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee. Bone Joint J. 2015; 97:786–792.
Article
25. Small SR, Berend ME, Ritter MA, Buckley CA, Rogge RD. Metal backing significantly decreases tibial strains in a medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty model. J Arthroplasty. 2011; 26:777–782.
Article
26. Scott CE, Eaton MJ, Nutton RW, Wade FA, Pankaj P, Evans SL. Proximal tibial strain in medial unicompartmental knee replacements: a biomechanical study of implant design. Bone Joint J. 2013; 95:1339–1347.
27. Kort NP, van Raay JJ, van Horn JJ. The Oxford phase III unicompartmental knee replacement in patients less than 60 years of age. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007; 15:356–360.
28. Ollivier M, Parratte S, Argensen J. Insall & Scott surgery of the knee. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier;2018. p. 1420–1429.
29. Jauregui JJ, Blum CL, Sardesai N, Bennett C, Henn RF 3rd, Adib F. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2018; 26:2309499018770925.
Article
30. Zhang Q, Guo W, Liu Z, Cheng L, Yue D, Zhang N. Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in treatment of osteonecrosis versus osteoarthritis: a matched-pair comparison. Acta Orthop Belg. 2015; 81:333–339.