Neonatal Med.  2019 May;26(2):91-95. 10.5385/nm.2019.26.2.91.

Efficacy of Oral Rehabilitation Therapy in Terms of Neonatal Outcomes in Preterm Infants

• Chun SH
• Jeong WJ
• Sung TJ

• KMID: 2451606
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5385/nm.2019.26.2.91

Abstract

PURPOSE
To evaluate the efficacy of oral rehabilitation therapy (ORT) in terms of prematurity-associated morbidities in preterm infants born before a gestational age of 33 weeks.
METHODS
This was a single-institution retrospective case-control study including 78 high-risk preterm infants born between January 2015 and December 2016, who were administered with ORT for at least 15 minutes, 2 to 5 times/week by an occupational therapist. Various factors associated with feeding progression and neonatal morbidities were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS
Seventy-eight subjects, of whom 39 were cases and 39 controls, were included in this study. Infants in the case group achieved a greater total feeding volume (122.9±85.3 mL vs. 48.9±25.7 mL, P<0.001), i.e., 8 times/day with oral feeding only, and showed significantly higher body weight (1,852.1±303.3 g vs. 1,592.3±444.1 g, P=0.003) than those in the control group with complete oral feeding day. The duration from the first day of oral feeding to full enteral feeding, i.e., 150 mL/day, was significantly shorter in the cases than that in the controls (15.4±1.4 days vs. 23.1±1.8 days, P=0.004). The body weight at discharge was higher in the cases than that in the controls (3,102.6± 619.3 g vs. 2,744.6± 436.8 g, P=0.008). Moreover, the incidence of late-onset sepsis was lower in the cases than that in the controls (12.8% vs. 25.6%, P=0.033). Other prematurity-associated morbidities were not different between the two groups.
CONCLUSION
ORT in preterm infants facilitated the transition process from tube feeding to full oral feeding and reduced the incidence of late-onset sepsis.

Keyword

Treatment outcome; Infant, premature; Bottle feeding

MeSH Terms

Body Weight
Bottle Feeding
Case-Control Studies
Enteral Nutrition
Gestational Age
Humans
Incidence
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Infant, Premature*
Rehabilitation*
Retrospective Studies
Sepsis
Treatment Outcome

Reference

1. Kim KS, Bae CW. Trends in survival rate for very low birth weight infants and extremely low birth weight infants in Korea, 1967-2007. Korean J Pediatr. 2008; 51:237–42.

2. National Institute of Health. Korean Neonatal Network Annual Report 2015. Cheongju: National Institute of Health;2015.

3. Bingham PM. Deprivation and dysphagia in premature infants. J Child Neurol. 2009; 24:743–9.

4. Barlow SM, Finan DS, Lee J, Chu S. Synthetic orocutaneous stimulation entrains preterm infants with feeding difficulties to suck. J Perinatol. 2008; 28:541–8.

5. Einarsson-Backes LM, Deitz J, Price R, Glass R, Hays R. The effect of oral support on sucking efficiency in preterm infants. Am J Occup Ther. 1994; 48:490–8.

6. Field T, Ignatoff E, Stringer S, Brennan J, Greenberg R, Widmayer S, et al. Nonnutritive sucking during tube feedings: effects on preterm neonates in an intensive care unit. Pediatrics. 1982; 70:381–4.

7. Leonard EL, Trykowski LE, Kirkpatrick BV. Nutritive sucking in high-risk neonates after perioral stimulation. Phys Ther. 1980; 60:299–302.

8. Boiron M, Da Nobrega L, Roux S, Henrot A, Saliba E. Effects of oral stimulation and oral support on non-nutritive sucking and feeding performance in preterm infants. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007; 49:439–44.

9. Bragelien R, Rokke W, Markestad T. Stimulation of sucking and swallowing to promote oral feeding in premature infants. Acta Paediatr. 2007; 96:1430–2.

10. Cunha M, Barreiros J, Goncalves I, Figueiredo H. Nutritive sucking pattern: from very low birth weight preterm to term newborn. Early Hum Dev. 2009; 85:125–30.

11. Daley HK, Kennedy CM. Meta analysis: effects of interventions on premature infants feeding. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2000; 14:62–77.

12. Poore M, Zimmerman E, Barlow SM, Wang J, Gu F. Patterned orocutaneous therapy improves sucking and oral feeding in preterm infants. Acta Paediatr. 2008; 97:920–7.

13. Choi HW, Park HW, Kim HY, Lim G, Koo SE, Lee BS, et al. Feeding desaturation and effects of orocutaneous stimulation in extremely low birth weight infants. J Korean Soc Neonatol. 2010; 17:193–200.

14. Fucile S, Gisel E, Lau C. Oral stimulation accelerates the transition from tube to oral feeding in preterm infants. J Pediatr. 2002; 141:230–6.

15. Rocha AD, Moreira ME, Pimenta HP, Ramos JR, Lucena SL. A randomized study of the efficacy of sensory-motor-oral stimulation and non-nutritive sucking in very low birthweight infant. Early Hum Dev. 2007; 83:385–8.

16. Kim H, Bang KS. Effects of an oral stimulation program on the transition from tube to bottle feeding in premature infants. J Korean Acad Fundam Nurs. 2011; 18:160–7.

17. Gaebler CP, Hanzlik JR. The effects of a prefeeding stimulation program on preterm infants. Am J Occup Ther. 1996; 50:184–92.

18. American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Hospital discharge of the high-risk neonate: proposed guidelines. Pediatrics. 1998; 102:411–7.