J Clin Neurol.  2019 Jul;15(3):285-291. 10.3988/jcn.2019.15.3.285.

Clinical Usefulness of Intraoperative Motor-Evoked Potential Monitoring during Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Surgery

• Koo DL
• Lee WG
• Hong SC
• Seo DW

• KMID: 2451110
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3988/jcn.2019.15.3.285

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
We aimed to determine the effectiveness of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring focused on the transcranial motor-evoked potential (MEP) in patients with medically refractory temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE).
METHODS
We compared postoperative neurological deficits in patients who underwent TLE surgery with or without transcranial MEPs combined with somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring between January 1995 and June 2018. Transcranial motor stimulation was performed using subdermal electrodes, and MEP responses were recorded in the four extremity muscles. A decrease of more than 50% in the MEP or the SSEP amplitudes compared with baseline was used as a warning criterion.
RESULTS
In the TLE surgery group without MEP monitoring, postoperative permanent motor deficits newly developed in 7 of 613 patients. In contrast, no permanent motor deficit occurred in 279 patients who received transcranial MEP and SSEP monitoring. Ten patients who exhibited decreases of more than 50% in the MEP amplitude recovered completely, although two cases showed transient motor deficits that recovered within 3 months postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS
Intraoperative transcranial MEP monitoring during TLE surgery allowed the prompt detection and appropriate correction of injuries to the motor nervous system or ischemic stroke. Intraoperative transcranial MEP monitoring is a reliable modality for minimizing motor deficits in TLE surgery.

Keyword

temporal lobe epilepsy; intraoperative monitoring; motor-evoked potentials

MeSH Terms

Electrodes
Epilepsy, Temporal Lobe*
Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory
Extremities
Humans
Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring
Monitoring, Intraoperative
Muscles
Nervous System
Stroke
Temporal Lobe*

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 MEP changes during epilepsy surgery in case 8. A: The early waves of MEP and SSEP before craniectomy are shown. Left and right MEP are in upper panel. Left median, right median, left posterior tibial, and right posterior tibial nerve SSEP (from left to right) are in lower panel. Waves in green are real-time acquired data, while those in black are baseline one. B: In MEP monitoring, the waves in right lower extremity disappeared for 17 minutes during temporal lobe epilepsy surgery (arrowhead). No significant changes in SSEP occur throughout the operation. The photo shows the operative field in right ATL+AH. ADQ: abductor digiti quinti, AH: abductor halluces, APB: abductor pollicis brevis, ATL: anterior temporal lobectomy, LT: left, MEP: motor-evoked potential, RT: right, SSEP: somatosensory evoked potential, TA: tibialis anterior.

• 

  Fig. 2 Stack images of MEP changes during epilepsy surgery in case 8. A: In left MEP monitoring, no significant wave changes of right upper and lower extremities are observed during the surgery. B: In right MEP monitoring, MEP disappears for 17 minutes (open arrow) and recovers after releasing cerebral retraction (closed arrow). ADQ: abductor digiti quinti, AH: abductor halluces, APB: abductor pollicis brevis, Lt: left, MEP: motor-evoked potential, Rt: right, TA: tibialis anterior.

Reference

1. Wiebe S, Blume WT, Girvin JP, Eliasziw M. Effectiveness and Efficiency of Surgery for Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Study Group. A randomized, controlled trial of surgery for temporal-lobe epilepsy. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345:311–318. PMID: 11484687.

2. Engel J Jr. The timing of surgical intervention for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy: a plan for a randomized clinical trial. Arch Neurol. 1999; 56:1338–1341. PMID: 10555652.

3. Al-Otaibi F, Baeesa SS, Parrent AG, Girvin JP, Steven D. Surgical techniques for the treatment of temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsy Res Treat. 2012; 2012:374848. PMID: 22957228.

4. Muzumdar D, Patil M, Goel A, Ravat S, Sawant N, Shah U. Mesial temporal lobe epilepsy–An overview of surgical techniques. Int J Surg. 2016; 36:411–419. PMID: 27773861.

5. Georgiadis I, Kapsalaki EZ, Fountas KN. Temporal lobe resective surgery for medically intractable epilepsy: a review of complications and side effects. Epilepsy Res Treat. 2013; 2013:752195. PMID: 24288602.

6. Kim SM, Kim SH, Seo DW, Lee KW. Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring: basic principles and recent update. J Korean Med Sci. 2013; 28:1261–1269. PMID: 24015028.

7. Ichikawa T, Suzuki K, Sasaki T, Matsumoto M, Sakuma J, Oinuma M, et al. Utility and the limit of motor evoked potential monitoring for preventing complications in surgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformation. Neurosurgery. 2010; 67(3 Suppl Operative):ons222–ons228. PMID: 20679926.

8. Maruta Y, Fujii M, Imoto H, Nomura S, Tanaka N, Inamura A, et al. Strategies and pitfalls of motor-evoked potential monitoring during supratentorial aneurysm surgery. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016; 25:484–495. PMID: 26639401.

9. Neuloh G, Pechstein U, Cedzich C, Schramm J. Motor evoked potential monitoring with supratentorial surgery. Neurosurgery. 2007; 61(1 Suppl):337–346. PMID: 18813156.

10. Szelényi A, Hattingen E, Weidauer S, Seifert V, Ziemann U. Intraoperative motor evoked potential alteration in intracranial tumor surgery and its relation to signal alteration in postoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosurgery. 2010; 67:302–313. PMID: 20644415.

11. Mathon B, Navarro V, Bielle F, Nguyen-Michel VH, Carpentier A, Baulac M, et al. Complications after surgery for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy associated with hippocampal sclerosis. World Neurosurg. 2017; 102:639–650.e2. PMID: 28389411.

12. Girvin JP. Resection of intracranial lesions under local anesthesia. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 1986; 24:133–155.

13. Schuele SU, Lüders HO. Intractable epilepsy: management and therapeutic alternatives. Lancet Neurol. 2008; 7:514–524. PMID: 18485315.

14. Spencer S, Huh L. Outcomes of epilepsy surgery in adults and children. Lancet Neurol. 2008; 7:525–537. PMID: 18485316.

15. Erba G, Winston KR, Adler JR, Welch K, Ziegler R, Hornig GW. Temporal lobectomy for complex partial seizures that began in childhood. Surg Neurol. 1992; 38:424–432. PMID: 1298107.

16. Heller AC, Padilla RV, Mamelak AN. Complications of epilepsy surgery in the first 8 years after neurosurgical training. Surg Neurol. 2009; 71:631–637. PMID: 18514273.

17. Oertel J, Gaab MR, Runge U, Schroeder HW, Wagner W, Piek J. Neuronavigation and complication rate in epilepsy surgery. Neurosurg Rev. 2004; 27:214–217. PMID: 15048558.

18. Kombos T, Picht T, Derdilopoulos A, Suess O. Impact of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring on surgery of high-grade gliomas. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2009; 26:422–425. PMID: 19952567.

19. Talacchi A, Turazzi S, Locatelli F, Sala F, Beltramello A, Alessandrini F, et al. Surgical treatment of high-grade gliomas in motor areas. The impact of different supportive technologies: a 171-patient series. J Neurooncol. 2010; 100:417–426. PMID: 20467787.

20. Zhong J, Dujovny M, Perlin AR, Perez-Arjona E, Park HK, Diaz FG. Brain retraction injury. Neurol Res. 2003; 25:831–838. PMID: 14669526.

21. Lyon R, Feiner J, Lieberman JA. Progressive suppression of motor evoked potentials during general anesthesia: the phenomenon of “anesthetic fade”. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2005; 17:13–19. PMID: 15632537.

22. Abboud T, Huckhagel T, Stork JH, Hamel W, Schwarz C, Vettorazzi E, et al. Why does threshold level change in transcranial motor-evoked potentials during surgery for supratentorial lesions? J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2017; 29:393–399. PMID: 27482981.

23. MacDonald DB. Safety of intraoperative transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potential monitoring. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2002; 19:416–429. PMID: 12477987.

24. Legatt AD, Emerson RG, Epstein CM, MacDonald DB, Deletis V, Bravo RJ, et al. ACNS guideline: transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potential monitoring. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2016; 33:42–50. PMID: 26756258.