Korean J Women Health Nurs.  2019 Mar;25(1):73-85. 10.4069/kjwhn.2019.25.1.73.

Factors Affecting the Sexual Function of Pregnant Women

Affiliations
  • 1Assistant Professor, Department of Nursing, Choonhae College of Health Science, Ulsan, Korea.
  • 2Associate Professor, Department of Nursing, Pukyong National University, Busan, Korea. mjy7955@pknu.ac.kr

Abstract

PURPOSE
To determine whether maternal attitude toward sex during pregnancy and health-related quality of life could influence sexual function of pregnant women.
METHODS
In this study, 138 second and third trimester pregnant women completed self-report questionnaires during their visits to women's hospitals or community health centers to assess their general characteristics, attitude toward sex during pregnancy (PIES-M), health-related quality of life (EQ-5D), and sexual function (FSFI-6K). Multiple regression analysis was performed to test the research model with SPSS version 23.
RESULTS
Pregnant women who had discontinued their sexual life after recognizing their pregnancy accounted for 27.5% of women questioned. The average sexual function score of pregnant women was higher in the second trimester than the third trimester. Attitude toward sex during pregnancy (β=−.38, p< .001), maintaining sexual life (β=.20, p=.028), health-related quality of life (β=.18, p=.030), and adverse symptoms during sex (β=.18, p=.042) were determinants of sexual function during pregnancy.
CONCLUSION
Nurses in antenatal care units need to help pregnant women maintain a positive attitude toward sexual activity during pregnancy and manage their health-related quality of life to maintain their sexual life during pregnancy.

Keyword

Pregnancy; Sexual behavior; Attitude; Health

MeSH Terms

Community Health Centers
Female
Humans
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Trimester, Second
Pregnancy Trimester, Third
Pregnant Women*
Quality of Life
Sexual Behavior

Cited by  1 articles

Influence of pregnant couples' attitudes towards sex during pregnancy on sexual function
Moon Jeong Kim
Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2020;26(2):161-170.    doi: 10.4069/kjwhn.2020.06.18.1.


Reference

1. Salehy FJ. The development and validation of marital satisfaction questionnaire on a sample of students of Ferdowsi University. Psychother Novelties. 1999; 4(13):84–93.
2. Jamali S, Mosalanejad L. Sexual dysfunction in Iranian pregnant women. Iranian Journal of Reproductive Medicine. 2013; 11(6):479–486.
3. Leite AP, Campos AA, Dias AR, Amed AM, De Souza E, Camano L. Prevalence of sexual dysfunction during pregnancy. Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira. 2009; 55(5):563–568.
Article
4. Onah HE, Iloabachie GC, Obi SN, Ezugwu FO, Eze JN. Nigerian male sexual activity during pregnancy. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2002; 76(2):219–223.
Article
5. Trutnovsky G, Haas J, Lang U, Petru E. Women's perception of sexuality during pregnancy and after birth. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2006; 46(4):282–287.
6. Corbacioglu Esmer A, Akca A, Akbayir O, Goksedef BP, Bakir VL. Female sexual function and associated factors during pregnancy. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research. 2013; 39(6):1165–1172.
Article
7. Aslan G, Aslan D, Kizilyar A, Ispahi C, Esen A. A prospective analysis of sexual functions during pregnancy. International Journal of Impotence Research. 2005; 17(2):154–157.
Article
8. Radoš SN, Vraneš HS, Šunjić M. Limited role of body satisfaction and body image self-consciousness in sexual frequency and satisfaction in pregnant women. The Journal of Sex Research. 2014; 51(5):532–541.
Article
9. Kim HE, Yeo JH. Impact of sexual attitude and marital intimacy on sexual satisfaction in pregnant couples: An application of the actor-partner interdependence model. Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing. 2017; 23(3):201–209.
Article
10. von Sydow K. Sexuality during pregnancy and after childbirth: a metacontent analysis of 59 studies. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 1999; 47(1):27–49.
11. Jawed-Wessel S, Herbenick D, Schick V, Fortenberry JD, Cattelona G, Reece M. Development and validation of the maternal and partner sex during pregnancy scales. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy. 2016; 42(8):681–701.
Article
12. Nam H, Kim K, Kwon S, Koh K, Poul K. EQ-5D Korean valuation study using time trade-off method. Cheongju: National Institute of Health;2007. p. 26–60.
13. Ramírez-Vélez R. Pregnancy and health-related quality of life: a cross sectional study. Colombia Médica. 2011; 42(4):476–481.
14. Kim HY, Ko E. Factors influencing sexual function in postmenopausal married women. Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing. 2016; 22(4):287–296.
Article
15. Yu HS. Predictors of female sexual dysfunction [master's thesis]. Seoul: Seoul National University;2003. 56.
16. Kim MJ, Kim MS, Kim YH, Lee YM, Oh EJ. A validation study of the maternal and partner sex during pregnancy scale in Korean couples. In : 21st East Asian Forum of Nursing Scholars & 11th International Nursing Conferences; Seoul. 2018. p. 56.
17. Lee Y, Lim MC, Joo J, Park K, Lee S, Seo S, et al. Development and validation of the Korean version of the female sexual function index-6 (FSFI-6K). Yonsei Medical Journal. 2014; 55(5):1442–1446.
Article
18. Afshar Y, Nguyen M, Mei J, Grisales T. Sexual health and function in pregnancy. Contemporary Ob/Gyn. 2017; 62(8):24–30.
19. Rahimi S, Seyyed Rasooli E. Sexual behavior during pregnancy: a descriptive study of pregnant women in Tabriz, Iran. Payesh. 2004; 3(4):291–299.
20. Lee YP, Kim SJ, Jeong GH. Pregnant women's attitude and satisfaction for sexuality. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2000; 30(5):1292–1302.
Article
21. Wu WH, Meijer OG, Uegaki K, Mens JM, van Dieën JH, Wuisman PI, et al. Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain (PPP), I: Terminology, clinical presentation, and prevalence. European Spine Journal. 2004; 13(7):575–589.
Article
22. Heidari M, Aminshokravi F, Zayeri F, Azin SA. Effect of sexual education on sexual function of iranian couples during pregnancy: a quasi experimental study. Journal of Reproduction & Infertility. 2018; 19(1):39–48.
23. Abouzari-Gazafroodi K, Najafi F, Kazemnejad E, Rahnama P, Montazeri A. Demographic and obstetric factors affecting women's sexual functioning during pregnancy. Reproductive Health. 2015; 12(1):72–76.
Article
24. Biblica. New international version. Biblica [Internet]. Colorado Springs: Author;2011. cited 2019 Dec 20. Available from: https://www.biblegateway.com/versions/New-International-Version-NIV-Bible/#booklist.
25. Seo KS. A study on the modern taegyo from the perspective of Taegyo-Singi [master's thesis]. Seoul: Sungkyunkwan University;2014. 116.
26. Huntley R. Sexing the belly: an exploration of sex and the pregnant body. Sexualities. 2000; 3(3):347–362.
Article
27. Beveridge JK, Vannier SA, Rosen NO. Fear-based reasons for not engaging in sexual activity during pregnancy: associations with sexual and relationship well-being. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2018; 39(2):138–145.
Article
28. Fok WY, Chan LY, Yuen PM. Sexual behavior and activity in Chinese pregnant women. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2005; 84(10):934–938.
Article
29. Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Obstetrics. 5th ed. Seoul: Koonja;2015. p. 154.
30. Chun N. A structural equation model on sexual function in women with gynecologic cancer. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2008; 38(5):639–648.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KJWHN
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr