Yonsei Med J.  2019 May;60(5):423-428. 10.3349/ymj.2019.60.5.423.

Association of Newly Developed Right Bundle Branch Block with Graft Rejection Following Heart Transplantation

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. smkang@yuhs.ac
  • 2Departement of Cardiology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Chungju, Korea.
  • 3Departement of Cardiology, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
We aimed to examine associations between right bundle branch block (RBBB) following heart transplantation (HT) and graft rejection.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We investigated 51 patients who underwent endomyocardial biopsies, electrocardiogram, right-side cardiac catheterization, and echocardiography at 1 month and 1 year after HT. We classified patients into four groups according to the development of RBBB, based on electrocardiogram at 1 month and 1 year: 1) sustained RBBB, 2) disappeared RBBB, 3) newly developed RBBB, and 4) sustained non-RBBB. The RBBB was defined as an RSR' pattern in V1 with a QRS duration ≥100 ms on electrocardiogram.
RESULTS
The newly developed RBBB group (n=13, 25.5%) had a higher rate of new onset graft rejection (from grade 0 to grade ≥1R, 30.8% vs. 10.0% vs. 21.4%, p=0.042) at 1 year, compared with sustained RBBB (n=10, 19.6%) and sustained non-RBBB group (n=28, 54.9%). In contrast, the incidence of resolved graft rejection (from grade ≥1R to grade 0) was higher in the sustained RBBB group than the newly developed RBBB and sustained non-RBBB groups (70.0% vs. 7.7% vs. 25.0%, p=0.042). Left atrial volume index was significantly higher in the newly developed RBBB group than the sustained RBBB and sustained non-RBBB groups (60.6±25.9 mL/m2 vs. 36.0±11.0 mL/m2 vs. 38.4±18.1 mL/m2, p=0.003).
CONCLUSION
Close monitoring for new development of RBBB at 1 year after HT, which was associated with a higher incidence of new onset graft rejection, may be helpful to identify high risk patients for graft rejection.

Keyword

Right bundle branch block; heart transplantation; rejection

MeSH Terms

Biopsy
Bundle-Branch Block*
Cardiac Catheterization
Cardiac Catheters
Echocardiography
Electrocardiography
Graft Rejection*
Heart Transplantation*
Heart*
Humans
Incidence
Transplants*

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Flow diagram of each group according to the development of RBBB after HT. HT, heart transplantation; RBBB, right bundle branch block.


Reference

1. Sandhu JS, Curtiss EI, Follansbee WP, Zerbe TR, Kormos RL. The scalar electrocardiogram of the orthotopic heart transplant recipient. Am Heart J. 1990; 119:917–923. PMID: 2321511.
Article
2. Gao SZ, Hunt SA, Wiederhold V, Schroeder JS. Characteristics of serial electrocardiograms in heart transplant recipients. Am Heart J. 1991; 122(3 Pt 1):771–774. PMID: 1877454.
Article
3. Leonelli FM, Pacifico A, Young JB. Frequency and significance of conduction defects early after orthotopic heart transplantation. Am J Cardiol. 1994; 73:175–179. PMID: 8296739.
Article
4. Jessen ME, Olivari MT, Wait MA, Meyer DM, Yancey CW Jr, Ring WS. Frequency and significance of right bundle branch block after cardiac transplantation. Am J Cardiol. 1994; 73:1009–1011. PMID: 8184837.
Article
5. Golshayan D, Seydoux C, Berguer DG, Stumpe F, Hurni M, Ruchat P, et al. Incidence and prognostic value of electrocardiographic abnormalities after heart transplantation. Clin Cardiol. 1998; 21:680–684. PMID: 9755386.
Article
6. Osa A, Almenar L, Arnau MA, Martínez-Dolz L, Rueda J, Morillas P, et al. Is the prognosis poorer in heart transplanted patients who develop a right bundle branch block? J Heart Lung Transplant. 2000; 19:207–214. PMID: 10703698.
Article
7. Foerster A. The conduction system in human cardiac allografts. A histological and immunopathological study. Pathol Res Pract. 1992; 188:783–790. PMID: 1437842.
8. Calzolari V, Angelini A, Basso C, Livi U, Rossi L, Thiene G. Histologic findings in the conduction system after cardiac transplantation and correlation with electrocardiographic findings. Am J Cardiol. 1999; 84:756–759. PMID: 10498155.
Article
9. Chan JB, Levi DS, Lai CK, Alejos JC, Fishbein MC. Cellular rejection of the conduction system after orthotopic heart transplantation for congenital atrioventricular block. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2006; 25:1371–1375. PMID: 17097504.
Article
10. Aro AL, Anttonen O, Kerola T, Junttila MJ, Tikkanen JT, Rissanen HA, et al. Prognostic significance of prolonged PR interval in the general population. Eur Heart J. 2014; 35:123–129. PMID: 23677846.
Article
11. Stewart S, Winters GL, Fishbein MC, Tazelaar HD, Kobashigawa J, Abrams J, et al. Revision of the 1990 working formulation for the standardization of nomenclature in the diagnosis of heart rejection. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005; 24:1710–1720. PMID: 16297770.
Article
12. Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Pellikka PA, et al. Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005; 18:1440–1463. PMID: 16376782.
Article
13. Marcus GM, Hoang KL, Hunt SA, Chun SH, Lee BK. Prevalence, patterns of development, and prognosis of right bundle branch block in heart transplant recipients. Am J Cardiol. 2006; 98:1288–1290. PMID: 17056348.
Article
14. Villa AE, de Marchena EJ, Myerburg RJ, Castellanos A. Comparisons of paired orthotopic cardiac transplant donor and recipient electrocardiograms. Am Heart J. 1994; 127:70–74. PMID: 8273758.
Article
15. Ferretto S, Tafciu E, Giuliani I, Feltrin G, Bottio T, Gambino A, et al. Interventricular conduction disorders after orthotopic heart transplantation: risk factors and clinical relevance. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2017; 22:e12402.
Article
16. Martí S, Almenar L, Luis Vicente J, Torregrosa S, Roldán I, Moreno MT, et al. [Which variables predict the appearance of right bundle-branch block and its course after heart transplantation?]. Rev Esp Cardiol. 1996; 49:328–333. PMID: 8744386.
17. Thalen HJTh, Meere CC. Fundamentals of cardiac pacing. 1st ed. The Hague: Springer;1979. p. 44.
18. Butman SM, Phibbs B, Wild J, Copeland JG. One heart, two bodies: insight from the transplanted heart and its new electrocardiogram. Am J Cardiol. 1990; 66:632–635. PMID: 2392984.
Article
19. Alderman EL, Wexler L. Angiographic implications of cardiac transplantation. Am J Cardiol. 1989; 64:16E–21E. PMID: 2741809.
Article
20. Leonelli FM, Dunn JK, Young JB, Pacifico A. Natural history, determinants, and clinical relevance of conduction abnormalities following orthotopic heart transplantation. Am J Cardiol. 1996; 77:47–51. PMID: 8540456.
Article
21. Brunner-La Rocca HP, Sütsch G, Schneider J, Follath F, Kiowski W. Natural course of moderate cardiac allograft rejection (International Society for Heart Transplantation grade 2) early and late after transplantation. Circulation. 1996; 94:1334–1338. PMID: 8822989.
Article
22. Kwok CS, Rashid M, Beynon R, Barker D, Patwala A, Morley-Davies A, et al. Prolonged PR interval, first-degree heart block and adverse cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart. 2016; 102:672–680. PMID: 26879241.
Article
23. Payne ME, Murray KD, Watson KM, Galbraith TA, Horwanitz EP, Starling RC, et al. Permanent pacing in heart transplant recipients: underlying causes and long-term results. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1991; 10(5 Pt 1):738–742. PMID: 1958680.
24. Collins KK, Thiagarajan RR, Chin C, Dubin AM, Van Hare GF, Robbins RC, et al. Atrial tachyarrhythmias and permanent pacing after pediatric heart transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2003; 22:1126–1133. PMID: 14550822.
Article
25. Cannon BC, Denfield SW, Friedman RA, Fenrich AL, Dreyer WJ, Towbin JA, et al. Late pacemaker requirement after pediatric orthotopic heart transplantation may predict the presence of transplant coronary artery disease. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2004; 23:67–71. PMID: 14734129.
Article
26. Grutter G, Alfieri S, Calcagni G, Castelluzzo MA, Silvetti MS, Parisi F, et al. Paroxysmal atrioventricular block after heart transplantation in children: an early sign of rejection? Pediatr Transplant. 2016; 20:1164–1167. PMID: 27743416.
Article
27. Weckbach LT, Maurer U, Schramm R, Huber BC, Lackermair K, Weiss M, et al. Lower frequency routine surveillance endomyocardial biopsies after heart transplantation. PLoS One. 2017; 12:e0182880. PMID: 28841655.
Article
Full Text Links
  • YMJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr