Dement Neurocogn Disord.  2016 Dec;15(4):159-164. 10.12779/dnd.2016.15.4.159.

Disproportionate Decline of Executive Functions in Early Mild Cognitive Impairment, Late Mild Cognitive Impairment, and Mild Alzheimer's Disease

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Psychiatry, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea.
  • 2Department of Psychology, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Korea. ykang@hallym.ac.kr
  • 3Department of Neurology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Many literatures indicate that executive dysfunction exists in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) as well as Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, there are few studies that found how early the deficits of the executive function (EF) exist in MCI. The present study investigated the presence of executive dysfunctions in the earliest stage of MCI, and the sub-domains of EF which are disproportionately impaired earlier than others.
METHODS
The participants were 41 normal elderly (NE), 86 with amnestic multi-domain MCI, and 41 with mild AD. The MCI group was further sub-divided into two groups: Early MCI (EMCI, n=45) and late MCI (n=41), based on the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes. All participants were given neuropsychological tests to assess the sub-domains of EF, such as verbal fluency, psychomotor speed, inhibitory control, and mental set-shifting.
RESULTS
Impairment of semantic fluency was observed in EMCI, with gradual worsening as cases approached mild AD. Phonemic fluency and psychomotor speed were also impaired at the early stage of MCI relative to the NE, but maintained at the same level up to mild AD. EMCI exhibited the same degree of performance with NE for inhibitory control and mental set-shifting; however, they progressively worsened from EMCI to mild AD.
CONCLUSIONS
These results suggest that impairments of EF exist even in the earliest stage of the MCI, with a disproportionate decline in the sub-domains of EF.

Keyword

mild cognitive impairment; Alzheimer's disease; executive function; verbal fluency; psychomotor speed; inhibitory control; mental set-shifting

MeSH Terms

Aged
Alzheimer Disease*
Dementia
Executive Function*
Humans
Mild Cognitive Impairment*
Neuropsychological Tests
Semantics

Reference

1. Alvarez JA, Emory E. Executive function and the frontal lobes: a meta-analytic review. Neuropsychol Rev. 2006; 16:17–42.
2. Miller BL, Cummings JL. The Human Frontal Lobes: Functions and Disorders. 2nd. New York: Guilford Press;2007.
3. Broks P, Lines C, Atchison L, Challenor J, Traub M, Foster C, et al. Neuropsychological investigation of anterior and posterior cortical function in early-stage probable Alzheimer’s disease. Behav Neurol. 1996; 9:135–148.
Article
4. Dickerson BC, Wolk DA. Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Dysexecutive versus amnesic phenotypes of very mild Alzheimer’s disease are associated with distinct clinical, genetic and cortical thinning characteristics. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011; 82:45–51.
Article
5. Johns EK, Phillips NA, Belleville S, Goupil D, Babins L, Kelner N, et al. The profile of executive functioning in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: disproportionate deficits in inhibitory control. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2012; 18:541–555.
Article
6. Zhang Y, Han B, Verhaeghen P, Nilsson LG. Executive functioning in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: MCI has effects on planning, but not on inhibition. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2007; 14:557–570.
Article
7. Traykov L, Raoux N, Latour F, Gallo L, Hanon O, Baudic S, et al. Executive functions deficit in mild cognitive impairment. Cogn Behav Neurol. 2007; 20:219–224.
Article
8. Zheng D, Dong X, Sun H, Xu Y, Ma Y, Wang X. The overall impairment of core executive function components in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment: a cross-sectional study. BMC Neurol. 2012; 12:138.
Article
9. Chen NC, Chang CC, Lin KN, Huang CW, Chang WN, Chang YT, et al. Patterns of executive dysfunction in amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Int Psychogeriatr. 2013; 25:1181–1189.
Article
10. Summers MJ, Saunders NL. Neuropsychological measures predict decline to Alzheimer’s dementia from mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychology. 2012; 26:498–508.
Article
11. Rozzini L, Chilovi BV, Conti M, Bertoletti E, Delrio I, Trabucchi M, et al. Conversion of amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment to dementia of Alzheimer type is independent to memory deterioration. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007; 22:1217–1222.
Article
12. Lynch CA, Walsh C, Blanco A, Moran M, Coen RF, Walsh JB, et al. The clinical dementia rating sum of box score in mild dementia. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2006; 21:40–43.
Article
13. O’Bryant SE, Waring SC, Cullum CM, Hall J, Lacritz L, Massman PJ, et al. Staging dementia using clinical dementia rating scale sum of boxes scores: a Texas Alzheimer’s research consortium study. Arch Neurol. 2008; 65:1091–1095.
Article
14. O’Bryant SE, Lacritz LH, Hall J, Waring SC, Chan W, Khodr ZG, et al. Validation of the new interpretive guidelines for the clinical dementia rating scale sum of boxes score in the national Alzheimer’s coordinating center database. Arch Neurol. 2010; 67:746–749.
Article
15. Aisen PS, Petersen RC, Donohue MC, Gamst A, Raman R, Thomas RG, et al. Clinical core of the Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative: progress and plans. Alzheimers Dement. 2010; 6:239–246.
Article
16. Christensen KJ, Multhaup KS, Nordstrom S, Voss K. A cognitive battery for dementia: development and measurement characteristics. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991; 3:168–174.
Article
17. Kang YW. A normative study of the Korean-Mini Mental State Examination (K-MMSE) in the elderly. Korean J Psychol Gen. 2006; 25:1–12.
Article
18. Petersen RC. Clinical practice. Mild cognitive impairment. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364:2227–2234.
Article
19. McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, Stadlan EM. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurology. 1984; 34:939–944.
Article
20. Kang Y, Jahng SM, Na DL. Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery, 2nd ed (SNSB-II). Seoul: Human Brain Research & Consulting Co.;2012.
Article
21. Henry JD, Crawford JR, Phillips LH. Verbal fluency performance in dementia of the Alzheimer’s type: a meta-analysis. Neuropsychologia. 2004; 42:1212–1222.
Article
22. Henry JD, Crawford JR. A meta-analytic review of verbal fluency performance following focal cortical lesions. Neuropsychology. 2004; 18:284–295.
Article
23. Fabrigoule C, Rouch I, Taberly A, Letenneur L, Commenges D, Mazaux JM, et al. Cognitive process in preclinical phase of dementia. Brain. 1998; 121:135–141.
Article
24. Stephens R. Age-related decline in Digit-Symbol performance: eye-movement and video analysis. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2006; 21:101–107.
Article
25. Salthouse TA. The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychol Rev. 1996; 103:403–428.
Article
26. Turken A, Whitfield-Gabrieli S, Bammer R, Baldo JV, Dronkers NF, Gabrieli JD. Cognitive processing speed and the structure of white matter pathways: convergent evidence from normal variation and lesion studies. Neuroimage. 2008; 42:1032–1044.
Article
27. Rodríguez-Aranda C, Waterloo K, Sparr S, Sundet K. Age-related psychomotor slowing as an important component of verbal fluency: evidence from healthy individuals and Alzheimer’s patients. J Neurol. 2006; 253:1414–1427.
Article
28. Muir RT, Lam B, Honjo K, Harry RD, McNeely AA, Gao FQ, et al. Trail Making Test elucidates neural substrates of specific poststroke executive dysfunctions. Stroke. 2015; 46:2755–2761.
Article
29. Paulesu E, Goldacre B, Scifo P, Cappa SF, Gilardi MC, Castiglioni I, et al. Functional heterogeneity of left inferior frontal cortex as revealed by fMRI. Neuroreport. 1997; 8:2011–2017.
Article
30. Phelps EA, Hyder F, Blamire AM, Shulman RG. FMRI of the prefrontal cortex during overt verbal fluency. Neuroreport. 1997; 8:561–565.
Article
31. Botvinick MM, Cohen JD, Carter CS. Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update. Trends Cogn Sci. 2004; 8:539–546.
Article
32. Menon V, Adleman NE, White CD, Glover GH, Reiss AL. Error-related brain activation during a Go/NoGo response inhibition task. Hum Brain Mapp. 2001; 12:131–143.
Article
33. Rolls ET, Hornak J, Wade D, McGrath J. Emotion-related learning in patients with social and emotional changes associated with frontal lobe damage. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994; 57:1518–1524.
Article
34. Zakzanis KK, Mraz R, Graham SJ. An fMRI study of the Trail Making Test. Neuropsychologia. 2005; 43:1878–1886.
Article
35. Raz N, Gunning FM, Head D, Dupuis JH, McQuain J, Briggs SD, et al. Selective aging of the human cerebral cortex observed in vivo: differential vulnerability of the prefrontal gray matter. Cereb Cortex. 1997; 7:268–282.
Article
36. Tisserand DJ, Pruessner JC, Sanz Arigita EJ, van Boxtel MP, Evans AC, Jolles J, et al. Regional frontal cortical volumes decrease differentially in aging: an MRI study to compare volumetric approaches and voxel-based morphometry. Neuroimage. 2002; 17:657–669.
Article
37. Salat DH, Kaye JA, Janowsky JS. Selective preservation and degeneration within the prefrontal cortex in aging and Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol. 2001; 58:1403–1408.
38. Tisserand DJ, van Boxtel M, Gronenschild E, Jolles J. Age-related volume reductions of prefrontal regions in healthy individuals are differential. Brain Cogn. 2001; 47:182–185.
Full Text Links
  • DND
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr