Prog Med Phys.  2019 Mar;30(1):7-13. 10.14316/pmp.2019.30.1.7.

Comparison of Dosimetrical and Radiobiological Parameters on Three VMAT Techniques for Left-Sided Breast Cancer

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Bungdang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea. jbchung1213@gmail.com
  • 2Department of Biomedicine and Health Sciences, Research Institute of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
To compare the dosimetrical and radiobiological parameters among various volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) techniques using restricted and continuous arc beams for left-sided breast cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Ten patients with left-sided breast cancer without regional nodes were retrospectively selected and prescribed the dose of 42.6 Gy in 16 fractions on the planning target volume (PTV). For each patient, three plans were generated using the Eclipseâ„¢ system (Varian Medical System, Palo Alto, CA) with one partial arc 1pVMAT, two partial arcs 2pVMAT, and two tangential arcs 2tVMAT. All plans were calculated through anisotropic analytic algorithm and photon optimizer with 6 MV photon beam of VitalBEAMâ„¢. The same dose objectives for each plan were used to achieve a fair comparison during optimization.
RESULTS
For PTV, dosimetrical parameters such as Homogeneity index, conformity index, and conformal number were superior in 2pVMAT than those in both techniques. V95%, which indicates PTV coverage, was 91.86%, 96.60%, and 96.65% for 1pVMAT, 2pVMAT, and 2tVMAT, respectively. In most organs at risk (OARs), 2pVMAT significantly reduced the delivered doses compared with the other techniques, excluding the doses to contralateral lung. For the analysis of radiobiological parameters, a significant difference in normal tissue complication probability was observed in ipsilateral lung while no difference was observed in the other OARs.
CONCLUSIONS
Our study showed that 2pVMAT had better plan quality and normal tissue sparing than 1pVMAT and 2tVMAT but not for all parameters. Therefore, 2pVMAT could be considered the priority choice for the treatment planning for left breast cancer.

Keyword

Left sided breast cancer; Volumetric modulated arc therapy; Dosimetrical parameters; Radiobiological parameters

MeSH Terms

Breast Neoplasms
Humans
Lung
Organs at Risk
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated
Retrospective Studies
Unilateral Breast Neoplasms*

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Example of dose distribution in transverse plane for (a) 1pVMAT, (b) 2pVMAT, and (c) 2tVMAT.


Reference

1.Fisher B., Anderson S., Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year followup of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002. 347(16):1233–1241.
Article
2.Veronesi U., Cascinelli N., Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002. 347(16):1227–1232.
Article
3.Munshi A., Pai RH., Phurailatpam R, et al. Do all patients of breast carcinoma need 3-dimensional CT-based planning? A dosimetric study comparing different breast sizes. Med Dosim. 2009. 34(2):140–144.
Article
4.Pignol J., Olivotto I., Rakovitch E, et al. A multicenter randomized trial of breast intensity-modulated radiation therapy to reduce acute radiation dermatitis. J Clin Oncol. 2008. 26(13):2085–2092.
Article
5.Bird B., Swain S. Cardiac toxicity in breast cancer survivors: review of potential cardiac problems. Clin Cancer Res. 2008. 14(1):14–24.
Article
6.Lohr F., El-Haddad M., Dobler B, et al. Potential effect of robust and simple IMRT approach for left-sided breast cancer on cardiac mortality. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009. 74(1):73–80.
Article
7.Schubert LK, et al. Dosimetric comparison of left-sided whole breast irradiation with 3DCRT, forward-planned IMRT, inverse-planned IMRT, helical tomotherapy, and topotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2010. 100(2):241–246.
Article
8.Nilsson G., Holmberg L., Garmo H., Duvernoy O., Sjögren I., Lagerqvist B, et al. Distribution of coronary artery stenosis after radiation for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012. 30(4):380–386.
Article
9.Darby SC., Ewertz M., McGale P., Bennet AM., Blom-Goldman U., Brønnum D, et al. Risk of ischemic heart disease in women after radiotherapy for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013. 368(11):987–998.
Article
10.Hurkmans CW., Cho BCJ., Damen E., Zijp L., Mijnheer BJ. Reduction of cardiac and lung complication probabilities after breast irradiation using conformal radiotherapy with or without intensity modulation. Radiother Oncol. 2002. 62(2):163–171.
Article
11.Hong L., Hunt M., Chui C., Spirou S., Forster K., Lee H, et al. Intensity modulated tangential beam irradiation of the intact breast. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999. 44(5):1155–1164.
12.Xu XL., Wu H., Han SK. Dosimetry study of intensity modulated radiation therapy for left side breast cancer. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology. 2006. 15(3):192–195.
13.Virén Tuomas, et al. Tangential volumetric modulated arc therapy technique for left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy. Radiol Oncol. 2015. 10(1):79.
Article
14.Jin Guang-Hua, et al. A comparative dosimetric study for treating left-sided breast cancer for small breast size using five different radiotherapy techniques: conventional tangential field, filed-in-filed, tangential-IMRT, multi-beam IMRT and VMAT. Radiol Oncol. 2013. 8(1):89.
Article
15.Qiu Jian-Jian, et al. Dosimetric comparison of 3D conformal, IMRT, and V-MAT techniques for accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI). Med Dosim. 2014. 39(2):152–158.
Article
16.Badakhshi H., Kaul D., Nadobny J., Wille B., Sehouli J., Budach V. Image-guided volumetric modulated arc therapy for breast cancer: a feasibility study and plan comparison with three-dimensional conformal and intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Br J Radiol. 2013. 86(1032):20130515.
Article
17.Munshi Anusheel, et al. Short tangential arcs in VMAT based breast and chest wall radiotherapy lead to conformity of the breast dose with lesser cardiac and lung doses: a prospective study of breast conservation and mastectomy patients. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2017. 40(3):729–736.
Article
18.Fogliata Antonella, et al. Dosimetric trade-offs in breast treatment with VMAT technique. Br J Radiol. 2016. 90(1070):20160701.
Article
19.Whelan. Timothy J, et al. Long-term results of hypofractionated radiation therapy for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010. 362(6):513–520.
20.Gay HA., Niemierko A. A free program for calculating EUD-based NTCP and TCP in external beam radiotherapy. Phys Med. 2007. 23:115–125.
Article
21.Liu Haiyun, et al. Evaluation of 3D-CRT, IMRT and VMAT radiotherapy plans for left breast cancer based on clinical dosimetric study. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2016. 54:1–5.
Article
22.Vicini F.., Freedman G. M.., White J. R.A phase III trial of accelerated whole breast irradiation with hypofraction-ation plus concurrent boost versus standard whole breast irradiation plus sequential boost for early-stage breast cancer. RTOG 1005. 2012.
23.Xi Dan, et al. Advantages of a technique using two 50 degree arcs in simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy for left-sidebreast cancer. Sci Rep. 2017. 7(1):14748.
Article
Full Text Links
  • PMP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr