J Breast Cancer.  2019 Mar;22(1):1-14. 10.4048/jbc.2019.22.e6.

BRCA1 and Breast Cancer: a Review of the Underlying Mechanisms Resulting in the Tissue-Specific Tumorigenesis in Mutation Carriers

Affiliations
  • 1Charité– Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Biochemistry, Berlin, Germany. Lukas.Semmler@charite.de

Abstract

Since the first cloning of BRCA1 in 1994, many of its cellular interactions have been elucidated. However, its highly specific role in tumorigenesis in the breast tissue"”carriers of BRCA1 mutations are predisposed to life-time risks of up to 80%"”relative to many other tissues that remain unaffected, has not yet been fully enlightened. In this article, we have applied a universal model of tissue-specificity of cancer genes to BRCA1 and present a systematic review of proposed concepts classified into 4 categories. Firstly, tissue-specific differences in levels of BRCA1 expression and secondly differences in expression of proteins with redundant functions are outlined. Thirdly, cell-type specific interactions of BRCA1 are presented: its regulation of aromatase, its interaction with Progesterone- and receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand-signaling that controls proliferation of luminal progenitor cells, and its influence on cell differentiation via modulation of the key regulators jagged 1-NOTCH and snail family transcriptional repressor 2. Fourthly, factors specific to the cell-type as well as the environment of the breast tissue are elucidated: distinct frequency of losses of heterozygosity, interaction with X inactivation specific transcript RNA, estrogen-dependent induction of genotoxic metabolites and nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2, and regulation of sirtuin 1. In conclusion, the impact of these concepts on the formation of hormone-sensitive and -insensitive breast tumors is outlined.

Keyword

BRCA1 protein; Genes, BRCA1; Breast neoplasms; Haploinsufficiency; Organ specificity

MeSH Terms

Aromatase
BRCA1 Protein
Breast Neoplasms*
Breast*
Carcinogenesis*
Cell Differentiation
Clone Cells
Cloning, Organism
Genes, BRCA1
Genes, Neoplasm
Haploinsufficiency
Humans
Organ Specificity
Phenobarbital
RNA
Sirtuin 1
Snails
Stem Cells
X Chromosome Inactivation
Aromatase
BRCA1 Protein
Phenobarbital
RNA
Sirtuin 1

Figure

  • Figure 1 Domains of and selected proteins that interact with BRCA1.BARD1 = BRCA1-associated RING domain protein 1; PALB2 = partner and localizer of BRCA2; CTIP = C-terminal binding protein interacting protein; ABRAXAS = BRCA1 A complex subunit; BACH1 = BTB domain and CNC homolog 1; BRCT = BRCA1 C-terminus.

  • Figure 2 The interaction of different concepts for tissue-specific tumorigenesis in BRCA1 mutation carriers.All arrows behind proteins or processes indicate their change of activity in comparison to non-mutated individuals (aromatase ↑ indicates that its activity in mutation carriers is increased). Arrows between proteins or processes indicate whether the interaction increases or decreases the activity of the affected participant (BRCA1 ⟞ aromatase indicates that BRCA1 decreases aromatase's activity; consequently BRCA ↓ ⟞ aromatase ↑ indicates that 1) BRCA1 is decreased in mutation carriers, 2) that it physiologically decreases aromatases activity, and 3) that aromatase's activity is subsequently increased in mutation carriers). Not all concepts are illustrated. For detailed information see text.ES = estrogen; ER = estrogen receptor; PO = progesterone; PR = progesterone receptor; NF-κB = nuclear factor-κB; NRF2 = nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2; RANKL = receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand; JAG1 = jagged 1; CYP1A1 = cytochrome P450 1A1; SIRT1 = sirtuin 1; SNAI2 = snail family transcriptional repressor 2.


Reference

1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018; 68:394–424. PMID: 30207593.
Article
2. Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer. Familial breast cancer: collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 52 epidemiological studies including 58,209 women with breast cancer and 101,986 women without the disease. Lancet. 2001; 358:1389–1399. PMID: 11705483.
3. Easton DF. How many more breast cancer predisposition genes are there? Breast Cancer Res. 1999; 1:14–17. PMID: 11250676.
Article
4. Thompson D, Easton D. The genetic epidemiology of breast cancer genes. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2004; 9:221–236. PMID: 15557796.
Article
5. Foulkes WD, Brunet JS, Stefansson IM, Straume O, Chappuis PO, Bégin LR, et al. The prognostic implication of the basal-like (cyclin E high/p27 low/p53+/glomeruloid-microvascular-proliferation+) phenotype of BRCA1-related breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2004; 64:830–835. PMID: 14871808.
6. Chappuis PO, Nethercot V, Foulkes WD. Clinico-pathological characteristics of BRCA1- and BRCA2-related breast cancer. Semin Surg Oncol. 2000; 18:287–295. PMID: 10805950.
Article
7. Schaefer MH, Serrano L. Cell type-specific properties and environment shape tissue specificity of cancer genes. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:20707. PMID: 26856619.
Article
8. Roy R, Chun J, Powell SN. BRCA1 and BRCA2: different roles in a common pathway of genome protection. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011; 12:68–78. PMID: 22193408.
Article
9. Ohta T, Sato K, Wu W. The BRCA1 ubiquitin ligase and homologous recombination repair. FEBS Lett. 2011; 585:2836–2844. PMID: 21570976.
Article
10. Mullan PB, Quinn JE, Harkin DP. The role of BRCA1 in transcriptional regulation and cell cycle control. Oncogene. 2006; 25:5854–5863. PMID: 16998500.
Article
11. Savage KI, Harkin DP. BRCA1, a ‘complex’ protein involved in the maintenance of genomic stability. FEBS J. 2015; 282:630–646. PMID: 25400280.
Article
12. Densham RM, Morris JR. The BRCA1 Ubiquitin ligase function sets a new trend for remodelling in DNA repair. Nucleus. 2017; 8:116–125. PMID: 28032817.
Article
13. Uhlén M, Fagerberg L, Hallström BM, Lindskog C, Oksvold P, Mardinoglu A, et al. Proteomics. Tissue-based map of the human proteome. Science. 2015; 347:1260419. PMID: 25613900.
14. Romero A, García-García F, López-Perolio I, Ruiz de Garibay G, García-Sáenz JA, Garre P, et al. BRCA1 alternative splicing landscape in breast tissue samples. BMC Cancer. 2015; 15:219. PMID: 25884417.
Article
15. Colombo M, Blok MJ, Whiley P, Santamariña M, Gutiérrez-Enríquez S, Romero A, et al. Comprehensive annotation of splice junctions supports pervasive alternative splicing at the BRCA1 locus: a report from the ENIGMA consortium. Hum Mol Genet. 2014; 23:3666–3680. PMID: 24569164.
Article
16. D'Errico M, Lemma T, Calcagnile A, Proietti De Santis L, Dogliotti E. Cell type and DNA damage specific response of human skin cells to environmental agents. Mutat Res. 2007; 614:37–47. PMID: 16879839.
17. Nelson LR, Bulun SE. Estrogen production and action. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001; 45:S116–24. PMID: 11511861.
Article
18. Ghosh S, Lu Y, Katz A, Hu Y, Li R. Tumor suppressor BRCA1 inhibits a breast cancer-associated promoter of the aromatase gene (CYP19) in human adipose stromal cells. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2007; 292:E246–52. PMID: 16940470.
Article
19. Hu Y, Ghosh S, Amleh A, Yue W, Lu Y, Katz A, et al. Modulation of aromatase expression by BRCA1: a possible link to tissue-specific tumor suppression. Oncogene. 2005; 24:8343–8348. PMID: 16170371.
Article
20. Widschwendter M, Rosenthal AN, Philpott S, Rizzuto I, Fraser L, Hayward J, et al. The sex hormone system in carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations: a case-control study. Lancet Oncol. 2013; 14:1226–1232. PMID: 24140203.
Article
21. Colditz GA. Relationship between estrogen levels, use of hormone replacement therapy, and breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998; 90:814–823. PMID: 9625169.
Article
22. Kauff ND, Satagopan JM, Robson ME, Scheuer L, Hensley M, Hudis CA, et al. Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346:1609–1615. PMID: 12023992.
Article
23. Kotsopoulos J, Huzarski T, Gronwald J, Singer CF, Moller P, Lynch HT, et al. Bilateral oophorectomy and breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016; 109.
24. King MC, Wieand S, Hale K, Lee M, Walsh T, Owens K, et al. Tamoxifen and breast cancer incidence among women with inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2: national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project (NSABP-P1) breast cancer prevention trial. JAMA. 2001; 286:2251–2256. PMID: 11710890.
25. Rebbeck TR, Lynch HT, Neuhausen SL, Narod SA, Van't Veer L, Garber JE, et al. Prophylactic oophorectomy in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346:1616–1622. PMID: 12023993.
26. Thompson D, Easton DF. Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Cancer Incidence in BRCA1 mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002; 94:1358–1365. PMID: 12237281.
Article
27. Nolan E, Lindeman GJ, Visvader JE. Out-RANKing BRCA1 in mutation carriers. Cancer Res. 2017; 77:595–600. PMID: 28104682.
Article
28. Li W, Xiao C, Vonderhaar BK, Deng CX. A role of estrogen/ERalpha signaling in BRCA1-associated tissue-specific tumor formation. Oncogene. 2007; 26:7204–7212. PMID: 17496925.
29. Lee EY. Promotion of BRCA1-associated triple-negative breast cancer by ovarian hormones. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 20:68–73. PMID: 18197009.
Article
30. Hu Y. BRCA1, hormone, and tissue-specific tumor suppression. Int J Biol Sci. 2009; 5:20–27. PMID: 19119312.
Article
31. Pfeffer A, Schubbert R, Orend G, Hilger-Eversheim K, Doerfler W. Integrated viral genomes can be lost from adenovirus type 12-induced hamster tumor cells in a clone-specific, multistep process with retention of the oncogenic phenotype. Virus Res. 1999; 59:113–127. PMID: 10854170.
Article
32. Klein A, Li N, Nicholson JM, McCormack AA, Graessmann A, Duesberg P. Transgenic oncogenes induce oncogene-independent cancers with individual karyotypes and phenotypes. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2010; 200:79–99. PMID: 20620590.
Article
33. Nolan E, Vaillant F, Branstetter D, Pal B, Giner G, Whitehead L, et al. RANK ligand as a potential target for breast cancer prevention in BRCA1-mutation carriers. Nat Med. 2016; 22:933–939. PMID: 27322743.
Article
34. Visvader JE, Stingl J. Mammary stem cells and the differentiation hierarchy: current status and perspectives. Genes Dev. 2014; 28:1143–1158. PMID: 24888586.
Article
35. Cuyàs E, Corominas-Faja B, Martín MM, Martin-Castillo B, Lupu R, Brunet J, et al. BRCA1 haploinsufficiency cell-autonomously activates RANKL expression and generates denosumab-responsive breast cancer-initiating cells. Oncotarget. 2017; 8:35019–35032. PMID: 28388533.
Article
36. Lim E, Vaillant F, Wu D, Forrest NC, Pal B, Hart AH, et al. Aberrant luminal progenitors as the candidate target population for basal tumor development in BRCA1 mutation carriers. Nat Med. 2009; 15:907–913. PMID: 19648928.
Article
37. Buckley NE, Nic An tSaoir CB, Blayney JK, Oram LC, Crawford NT, D'Costa ZC, et al. BRCA1 is a key regulator of breast differentiation through activation of Notch signalling with implications for anti-endocrine treatment of breast cancers. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013; 41:8601–8614. PMID: 23863842.
Article
38. Lindeman GJ, Visvader JE. Cell fate takes a slug in BRCA1-associated breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2011; 13:306. PMID: 21489318.
Article
39. Liu S, Ginestier C, Charafe-Jauffret E, Foco H, Kleer CG, Merajver SD, et al. BRCA1 regulates human mammary stem/progenitor cell fate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105:1680–1685. PMID: 18230721.
Article
40. Ginestier C, Liu S, Wicha MS. Getting to the root of BRCA1-deficient breast cancer. Cell Stem Cell. 2009; 5:229–230. PMID: 19733528.
Article
41. Moynahan ME, Jasin M. Mitotic homologous recombination maintains genomic stability and suppresses tumorigenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010; 11:196–207. PMID: 20177395.
Article
42. Monteiro AN. BRCA1: the enigma of tissue-specific tumor development. Trends Genet. 2003; 19:312–315. PMID: 12801723.
Article
43. Shao C, Stambrook PJ, Tischfield JA. Mitotic recombination is suppressed by chromosomal divergence in hybrids of distantly related mouse strains. Nat Genet. 2001; 28:169–172. PMID: 11381266.
Article
44. Pontier DB, Gribnau J. Xist regulation and function explored. Hum Genet. 2011; 130:223–236. PMID: 21626138.
Article
45. Silver DP, Dimitrov SD, Feunteun J, Gelman R, Drapkin R, Lu SD, et al. Further evidence for BRCA1 communication with the inactive X chromosome. Cell. 2007; 128:991–1002. PMID: 17350581.
Article
46. Ganesan S, Silver DP, Drapkin R, Greenberg R, Feunteun J, Livingston DM. Association of BRCA1 with the inactive X chromosome and XIST RNA. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004; 359:123–128. PMID: 15065664.
Article
47. Ganesan S, Silver DP, Greenberg RA, Avni D, Drapkin R, Miron A, et al. BRCA1 supports XIST RNA concentration on the inactive X chromosome. Cell. 2002; 111:393–405. PMID: 12419249.
Article
48. Chaligné R, Heard E. X-chromosome inactivation in development and cancer. FEBS Lett. 2014; 588:2514–2522. PMID: 24937141.
Article
49. Xiao C, Sharp JA, Kawahara M, Davalos AR, Difilippantonio MJ, Hu Y, et al. The XIST noncoding RNA functions independently of BRCA1 in X inactivation. Cell. 2007; 128:977–989. PMID: 17350580.
Article
50. Vincent-Salomon A, Ganem-Elbaz C, Manié E, Raynal V, Sastre-Garau X, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, et al. X inactive-specific transcript RNA coating and genetic instability of the X chromosome in BRCA1 breast tumors. Cancer Res. 2007; 67:5134–5140. PMID: 17545591.
Article
51. Pageau GJ, Hall LL, Lawrence JB. BRCA1 does not paint the inactive X to localize XIST RNA but may contribute to broad changes in cancer that impact XIST and Xi heterochromatin. J Cell Biochem. 2007; 100:835–850. PMID: 17146760.
Article
52. Wong RS. Apoptosis in cancer: from pathogenesis to treatment. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2011; 30:87. PMID: 21943236.
Article
53. Gorrini C, Gang BP, Bassi C, Wakeham A, Baniasadi SP, Hao Z, et al. Estrogen controls the survival of BRCA1-deficient cells via a PI3K-NRF2-regulated pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111:4472–4477. PMID: 24567396.
Article
54. Gorrini C, Baniasadi PS, Harris IS, Silvester J, Inoue S, Snow B, et al. BRCA1 interacts with Nrf2 to regulate antioxidant signaling and cell survival. J Exp Med. 2013; 210:1529–1544. PMID: 23857982.
Article
55. Lee YR, Park J, Yu HN, Kim JS, Youn HJ, Jung SH. Up-regulation of PI3K/Akt signaling by 17beta-estradiol through activation of estrogen receptor-alpha, but not estrogen receptor-beta, and stimulates cell growth in breast cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005; 336:1221–1226. PMID: 16169518.
56. Savage KI, Matchett KB, Barros EM, Cooper KM, Irwin GW, Gorski JJ, et al. BRCA1 deficiency exacerbates estrogen-induced DNA damage and genomic instability. Cancer Res. 2014; 74:2773–2784. PMID: 24638981.
Article
57. Yaghjyan L, Colditz GA. Estrogens in the breast tissue: a systematic review. Cancer Causes Control. 2011; 22:529–540. PMID: 21286801.
Article
58. Geisler J. Breast cancer tissue estrogens and their manipulation with aromatase inhibitors and inactivators. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2003; 86:245–253. PMID: 14623518.
Article
59. Pathania S, Bade S, Le Guillou M, Burke K, Reed R, Bowman-Colin C, et al. BRCA1 haploinsufficiency for replication stress suppression in primary cells. Nat Commun. 2014; 5:5496. PMID: 25400221.
Article
60. Fridlich R, Annamalai D, Roy R, Bernheim G, Powell SN. BRCA1 and BRCA2 protect against oxidative DNA damage converted into double-strand breaks during DNA replication. DNA Repair (Amst). 2015; 30:11–20. PMID: 25836596.
Article
61. Simic P, Zainabadi K, Bell E, Sykes DB, Saez B, Lotinun S, et al. SIRT1 regulates differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells by deacetylating β-catenin. EMBO Mol Med. 2013; 5:430–440. PMID: 23364955.
Article
62. Li X. SIRT1 and energy metabolism. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai). 2013; 45:51–60. PMID: 23257294.
Article
63. Palacios JA, Herranz D, De Bonis ML, Velasco S, Serrano M, Blasco MA. SIRT1 contributes to telomere maintenance and augments global homologous recombination. J Cell Biol. 2010; 191:1299–1313. PMID: 21187328.
Article
64. Wang RH, Zheng Y, Kim HS, Xu X, Cao L, Luhasen T, et al. Interplay among BRCA1, SIRT1, and survivin during BRCA1-associated tumorigenesis. Mol Cell. 2008; 32:11–20. PMID: 18851829.
Article
65. De Bonis ML, Ortega S, Blasco MA. SIRT1 is necessary for proficient telomere elongation and genomic stability of induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Reports. 2014; 2:690–706. PMID: 24936455.
Article
66. O'Sullivan RJ, Karlseder J. Telomeres: protecting chromosomes against genome instability. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010; 11:171–181. PMID: 20125188.
67. Sedic M, Skibinski A, Brown N, Gallardo M, Mulligan P, Martinez P, et al. Haploinsufficiency for BRCA1 leads to cell-type-specific genomic instability and premature senescence. Nat Commun. 2015; 6:7505. PMID: 26106036.
Article
68. Clarke CL, Sandle J, Jones AA, Sofronis A, Patani NR, Lakhani SR. Mapping loss of heterozygosity in normal human breast cells from BRCA1/2 carriers. Br J Cancer. 2006; 95:515–519. PMID: 16880780.
Article
69. King TA, Li W, Brogi E, Yee CJ, Gemignani ML, Olvera N, et al. Heterogenic loss of the wild-type BRCA allele in human breast tumorigenesis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007; 14:2510–2518. PMID: 17597348.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JBC
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr