Tissue Eng Regen Med.  2018 Dec;15(6):735-750. 10.1007/s13770-018-0140-z.

A Comparison of the Effects of Silica and Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles on Poly(ε-caprolactone)-Poly(ethylene glycol)-Poly(ε-caprolactone)/Chitosan Nanofibrous Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering

• Raeisdasteh Hokmabad V
• Davaran S
• Aghazadeh
• Alizadeh E
• Salehi R
• Ramazani A

• KMID: 2441265
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s13770-018-0140-z

Abstract

BACKGROUND
The major challenge of tissue engineering is to develop constructions with suitable properties which would mimic the natural extracellular matrix to induce the proliferation and differentiation of cells. Poly(ε-caprolactone)-poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL-PEG-PCL, PCEC), chitosan (CS), nano-silica (n-SiO₂) and nano-hydroxyapatite (n-HA) are biomaterials successfully applied for the preparation of 3D structures appropriate for tissue engineering.
METHODS
We evaluated the effect of n-HA and n-SiOâ‚‚ incorporated PCEC-CS nanofibers on physical properties and osteogenic differentiation of human dental pulp stem cells (hDPSCs). Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, field emission scanning electron microscope, transmission electron microscope, thermogravimetric analysis, contact angle and mechanical test were applied to evaluate the physicochemical properties of nanofibers. Cell adhesion and proliferation of hDPSCs and their osteoblastic differentiation on nanofibers were assessed using MTT assay, DAPI staining, alizarin red S staining, and QRT-PCR assay.
RESULTS
All the samples demonstrated bead-less morphologies with an average diameter in the range of 190-260 nm. The mechanical test studies showed that scaffolds incorporated with n-HA had a higher tensile strength than ones incorporated with n-SiOâ‚‚. While the hydrophilicity of n-SiOâ‚‚ incorporated PCEC-CS nanofibers was higher than that of samples enriched with n-HA. Cell adhesion and proliferation studies showed that n-HA incorporated nanofibers were slightly superior to n-SiOâ‚‚ incorporated ones. Alizarin red S staining and QRT-PCR analysis confirmed the osteogenic differentiation of hDPSCs on PCEC-CS nanofibers incorporated with n-HA and n-SiOâ‚‚.
CONCLUSION
Compared to other groups, PCEC-CS nanofibers incorporated with 15 wt% n-HA were able to support more cell adhesion and differentiation, thus are better candidates for bone tissue engineering applications.

Keyword

Tissue engineering; Nano-silica; Nano-hydroxyapatite; Human dental pulp stem cells; Nanofibers

MeSH Terms

Biocompatible Materials
Bone and Bones*
Cell Adhesion
Chitosan
Dental Pulp
Durapatite*
Extracellular Matrix
Humans
Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions
Nanofibers
Nanoparticles*
Osteoblasts
Silicon Dioxide*
Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared
Stem Cells
Tensile Strength
Tissue Engineering
Biocompatible Materials
Chitosan
Durapatite
Silicon Dioxide