Ultrasonography.  2019 Jan;38(1):50-57. 10.14366/usg.18004.

Fetal weight estimation by ultrasound: development of Indian population-based models

• Hiwale S
• Misra H
• Ulman S

• KMID: 2433292
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.14366/usg.18004

Abstract

PURPOSE
Existing ultrasound-based fetal weight estimation models have been shown to have high errors when used in the Indian population. Therefore, the primary objective of this study was to develop Indian population-based models for fetal weight estimation, and the secondary objective was to compare their performance against established models.
METHODS
Retrospectively collected data from 173 cases were used in this study. The inclusion criteria were a live singleton pregnancy and an interval from the ultrasound scan to delivery of ≤7 days. Multiple stepwise regression (MSR) and lasso regression methods were used to derive fetal weight estimation models using a randomly selected training group (n=137) with cross-products of abdominal circumference (AC), biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), and femur length (FL) as independent variables. In the validation group (n=36), the bootstrap method was used to compare the performance of the new models against 12 existing models.
RESULTS
The equations for the best-fit models obtained using the MSR and lasso methods were as follows: log₁₀(EFW)=2.7843700+0.0004197(HC×AC)+0.0008545(AC×FL) and log₁₀(EFW)=2.38 70211110+0.0074323216(HC)+0.0186555940(AC)+0.0013463735(BPD×FL)+0.0004519715 (HC×FL), respectively. In the training group, both models had very low systematic errors of 0.01% (±7.74%) and −0.03% (±7.70%), respectively. In the validation group, the performance of these models was found to be significantly better than that of the existing models.
CONCLUSION
The models presented in this study were found to be superior to existing models of ultrasound-based fetal weight estimation in the Indian population. We recommend a thorough evaluation of these models in independent studies.

Keyword

Ultrasonography, prenatal; Fetal weight; India; Regression analysis; Models, statistical

MeSH Terms

Femur
Fetal Weight*
Head
India
Methods
Models, Statistical
Pregnancy
Regression Analysis
Retrospective Studies
Ultrasonography*
Ultrasonography, Prenatal

Reference

References

1. Dudley NJ. A systematic review of the ultrasound estimation of fetal weight. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 25:80–89.

2. Leon DA, Moser KA. Low birth weight persists in South Asian babies born in England and Wales regardless of maternal country of birth: slow pace of acculturation, physiological constraint or both? Analysis of routine data. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012; 66:544–551.

3. Yajnik CS, Fall CH, Coyaji KJ, Hirve SS, Rao S, Barker DJ, et al. Neonatal anthropometry: the thin-fat Indian baby: the Pune Maternal Nutrition Study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2003; 27:173–180.

4. Kinare AS, Chinchwadkar MC, Natekar AS, Coyaji KJ, Wills AK, Joglekar CV, et al. Patterns of fetal growth in a rural Indian cohort and comparison with a Western European population: data from the Pune maternal nutrition study. J Ultrasound Med. 2010; 29:215–223.

5. Rao S, Yajnik CS, Kanade A, Fall CH, Margetts BM, Jackson AA, et al. Intake of micronutrient-rich foods in rural Indian mothers is associated with the size of their babies at birth: Pune Maternal Nutrition Study. J Nutr. 2001; 131:1217–1224.

6. Buck Louis GM, Grewal J, Albert PS, Sciscione A, Wing DA, Grobman WA, et al. Racial/ethnic standards for fetal growth: the NICHD Fetal Growth Studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 213:449.

7. Hiwale SS, Misra H, Ulman S. Ultrasonography-based fetal weight estimation: finding an appropriate model for an Indian population. J Med Ultrasound. 2017; 25:24–32.

8. Warsof SL, Gohari P, Berkowitz RL, Hobbins JC. The estimation of fetal weight by computer-assisted analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1977; 128:881–892.

9. Yuan M, Lin Y. Model selection and estimation in regression with grouped variables. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol. 2006; 68:49–67.

10. Tibshirani R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol. 1996; 58:267–288.

11. Team RC. R: a language and environment for statistical computing [computer software]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing;2016.

12. Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R. Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. J Stat Softw. 2010; 33:1–22.

13. Higginbottom J, Slater J, Porter G, Whitfield CR. Estimation of fetal weight from ultrasonic measurement of trunk circumference. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1975; 82:698–701.

14. Jordaan HV. Estimation of fetal weight by ultrasound. J Clin Ultrasound. 1983; 11:59–66.

15. Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Carpenter RJ, Deter RL, Park SK. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight. The value of femur length in addition to head and abdomen measurements. Radiology. 1984; 150:535–540.

16. Hsieh FJ, Chang FM, Huang HC, Lu CC, Ko TM, Chen HY. Computerassisted analysis for prediction of fetal weight by ultrasoundcomparison of biparietal diameter (BPD), abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL). Taiwan Yi Xue Hui Za Zhi. 1987; 86:957–964.

17. Woo JS, Wan CW, Cho KM. Computer-assisted evaluation of ultrasonic fetal weight prediction using multiple regression equations with and without the fetal femur length. J Ultrasound Med. 1985; 4:65–67.

18. Combs CA, Jaekle RK, Rosenn B, Pope M, Miodovnik M, Siddiqi TA. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight based on a model of fetal volume. Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 82:365–370.

19. Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS, Deter RL, Park SK. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements: a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985; 151:333–337.

20. Ott WJ, Doyle S, Flamm S, Wittman J. Accurate ultrasonic estimation of fetal weight. Prospective analysis of new ultrasonic formulas. Am J Perinatol. 1986; 3:307–310.

21. Hiwale SS. A systematic evaluation of ultrasound-based fetal weight estimation models on Indian population. J Med Ultrasound. 2017; 25:201–207.

22. Efron B, Tibshirani R. An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman/Hall;1993.

23. Mathai M, Thomas S, Peedicayil A, Regi A, Jasper P, Joseph R. Growth pattern of the Indian fetus. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1995; 48:21–24.

24. Parilla BV, McCulloch C, Sulo S, Curran L, McSherry D. Patterns of fetal growth in an Asian Indian cohort in the USA. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015; 131:178–182.

25. Gardosi J. Ultrasound biometry and fetal growth restriction. Fetal Matern Med Rev. 2002; 13:249–259.

26. Scioscia M, Scioscia F, Vimercati A, Caradonna F, Nardelli C, Pinto LR, et al. Estimation of fetal weight by measurement of fetal thigh soft-tissue thickness in the late third trimester. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 31:314–320.

27. Nahum GG, Stanislaw H, Huffaker BJ. Accurate prediction of term birth weight from prospectively measurable maternal characteristics. J Reprod Med. 1999; 44:705–712.